[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / doomer / eris / monarchy / newbrit / vg / vichan / vietnam / x ]

/monarchy/ - Past, Present, and Future

Monarchy news and discussion

Catalog   Archive

Winner of the 62rd Attention-Hungry Games
/eris/ - Wherein Is Explained Absolutely Everything Worth Knowing About Absolutely Anything.

November 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Subject *
Comment *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 4 per post.

The King is dead! Long live the King!

File: 1425421801505.jpg (39.4 KB, 512x338, 256:169, bloodywhitebaron2.jpg)


Welcome to /monarchy/. I'm editing this top post in order to condense things. This is now the only sticky and a general meta thread. There has been no change in BO, I'm just trying to clean things up a bit more. I may delete out posts in this thread just because I would like keeping the >>1 post for tradition's sake.

Rules: https://8ch.net/monarchy/charter.html

About/Links: https://8ch.net/monarchy/about.html

More specifically, if there is a new BO or volunteer of /monarchy/, it's announced here. If there is a change to the rules, it is promulgated here. This is also a thread I'll use to be a little less aloof and talk about minor and meta stuff: general feedback, complaining about troll threads, accepting submissions for flags, banners, moderation, and rules, etc.. A court, if you will.

15 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at



It looks like the Civil War is finally over.

File: 1427485651686.png (15.9 KB, 318x323, 318:323, ungern.png)


Can we get a Monarchist reading list?

I'll start with some:
Dante's De Monarchia
De Maistre's The Generative Principle of Political Constitutions
Filmer's Patriarcha
Kuehnelt-Leddihn's Liberty or Equality
74 posts and 28 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



>First time on this board, long time authoritarian and monarchist.

Very happy to receive you, peasant.

File: 4c78a45f02b9438⋯.jpg (196.38 KB, 800x1200, 2:3, 800px-Statue-Augustus.jpg)


The Romans were multicultural degenerates. They inflicted the blight of universalism on the White Man. They like other multiculturalists depended on gibsmedats and weaponry to keep the compliance of their foreign hordes, and once the gibs ran out with weapons dulling their time ran out for good.

1 post omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 55d273ddc03ab23⋯.jpg (74.09 KB, 1024x682, 512:341, Dante-Alighieri.jpg)

Yeah the "white man" was so hit by this evil empire that they were the ones who defended it to the last, prolonging its senile age by at least one-two centuries, tried to rebuild it and emulate it and asked the pope to pretty please give them the authority to larp as Roman Emperors throughout the middle ages, an era in which people, before the "middle ages" label was invented, still essentially considered themselves part of the Empire. Totally the same shit as modern "empires". Yeah.



>LARPing as Rome





pick one doe



All (non-pathological) men wish to be around their own kind. Not other kinds. You don't see Euro Republicans living around the diversity (at least when the diversity act indigenous instead of acting White).


>>5433 (dubs of truth)

File: 401003c76252e85⋯.jpg (126.61 KB, 1280x768, 5:3, photo_2018-08-25_06-58-22.jpg)


>me? i'd be an aristocrat, not a serf like 99% of the population

23 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.


Fascists are just race-aware commies, that hide thier economic illiteracy by decrying economics as vile jew sorcery. It's an ideology that's nothing more than "feels>reals" given structural form.


>guiding all nations

I could almost sympathize not agree with you for a second there but then you put globalist trash into your statement.



Monarchies have been the most common and longest lasting forms of government in human history. Fascist states have almost never lasted longer than a single generation. Or were they just not true fascism?


File: 4d211903ad2e909⋯.jpg (77.23 KB, 918x918, 1:1, ur3jngkp32k11.jpg)

File: fe3f67f64f01438⋯.jpg (123.44 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, a038283.jpg)


>you monarchists are hardcore LARPers, but we don't LARP!





File: f5d49ebf6aa30b6⋯.png (74.68 KB, 645x729, 215:243, brainlet.png)


>Fascists are just race-aware commies

Yikes. You're retarded

>hide thier economic illiteracy by decrying economics as vile jew sorcery

Stop worshipping the dollar you modernist idiot. You think degeneracy is ok when it's "in style" because that's what sells

File: 59c5fb19a66125b⋯.png (616.6 KB, 888x556, 222:139, Grace_Chan_Winterchan_.png)

File: eeefb04bf0bf2de⋯.mp4 (5.32 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Angels_We_Have_Heard_On_Hi….mp4)


A festive thread.

>is this /monarchy/ related?

Of course. Of course, it is. I don't need to even explain.

Post winter-related stuff, holiday tunes and favorite Christmas music.

Monarchy-related winter stuff.

15 posts and 23 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



You raise a very good point; even among "free market" types on the right capitalism is too often seen as a dirty word.

>I would even argue that Keynes and his policies alone did more to harm capitalism than anything Marx came up with

This is very true. The actual policies of Keynes (capitalism is broken, let's fix it) and socialists (capitalism is broken, let's replace it) are almost nonexistent. But the rhetoric is different enough that Keynesians come off as big-brained enlightened centrists, and their declarations about the market sound just sensible enough to fool people with a little knowledge.



Rodents belong in the sewer.


File: b68f270e22ff4e4⋯.jpg (52.26 KB, 400x533, 400:533, 90f.jpg)

Don't let the Russian winter bite!



Difference* in policies



Let it snow!

File: 175422504d429fc⋯.jpg (35.07 KB, 280x349, 280:349, 0acc6188.jpg)


Remember that the political animals are all breeds of ideological charlatan. If they subscribe to an ideology, they are a political animal; a political animal is somebody who chooses to be other than man; he chooses to become an partisan or idealist. They see everything through the lenses of their -ism and think highly of plain things. Political animals destroy each other, lavishing to take any mantle of authority. They are dogs in the mud, trampling over each other.

Don't become a political animal. Think of authority, not anarchism. Think of people for who they actually are, not what they "should" be or what party. Be loyal to someone and not an ideal. Don't aspire for power and control, but become somebody of action and authority. Find strength, not slander of opponents. Think of honor, not false chants of liberty; because liberty is honorable and before people are truly free they must become responsible first. Before anybody has any liberty, they must find duty, or else they seek to have liberty without any responsibility – that is a demagogue's tyranny.

67 posts and 38 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1830d9407ff5303⋯.gif (927.16 KB, 500x288, 125:72, 1508197424_ImaginativeWell….gif)


I hate political compasses.


File: 30b0de00d1b515b⋯.jpg (189.05 KB, 566x767, 566:767, Nicaea_icon.jpg)


Don't give me these ideologies, pan-European wishy-washy ultra-states, or utopianism. Empires are the foundation of our civilization.


File: 93fd51bd904a3c7⋯.gif (179.95 KB, 500x373, 500:373, 1477801441811.gif)


It's annoying me to DEATH with people bickering about 'true monarchist'. There are monarchies in all different kinds of stripes.

>inb4 you do it too

They need to stop thinking like republicans. There's a difference between reminding people to stop thinking like republicans and retarded bickering with monarchists about which monarchy is the true form.


And don't support royal houses like political parties.

I am mostly concerned with conduct.


Look, you have conviction but it's hard to take your message seriously with all these yaoi fagboy pictures.

At least post cute girl monarchs if you're gonna post 2D.



what is the difference between ultra-state and empire?

File: fbc6e82f9c91c53⋯.jpg (32.24 KB, 620x413, 620:413, FRANCE Pr 50.jpg)

File: fc5df3298d68410⋯.jpg (61.45 KB, 600x338, 300:169, 285ac43fb5f72833732a16d0bb….jpg)



>Macon & 5th Republic struggle to recuperate in France

>increasing taxation, foreign invaders, and lower social standing

>even members of the police force are coalescing

>for now seems non-partisan

>working class members of society entering Paris, rural folk too

<but muh Global Warmining; French media portrays them ultimately as far-right, increasing taxation justified to deal with 'global warming'

<muh storefronts and cars being flipped

Unfortunately, the media and others keep saying 'wait until the election' to resolve this problem. The roots of the Revolution and republicanism has sowed its own perpetual cycle of destruction. This time around I cannot blame them. Wishful thinking. Let Counter-Revolution return to the France. Expunge those poisonous roots of the Revolution.

8 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



Nah, they're probably just going to return to voting and not do anything.



why dont you like enlinghtment principles?


To borrow an expression from across the spectrum "On lâche rien!"

>Against Macron's distractions, public grievances lists!

Still nothing but crumbs for the French on the edge of successful globalisation, still the same contempt for the People and forever still and always this double language: they announce that we will discuss the migratory question the day when, without public debate, we sign the pact of Marrakesh, which organizes the migratory surge.

The yellow vests and, more generally, the French, have not been dupes to the smoking exercises of Macron on the evening of Monday, December 10, where he has with a rare indecency, the tear in the eye, spoken of "the single mother, widow or divorcee, who does not even live anymore, who does not have the means to keep their children and to improve their ends of the month and has no more hope. I saw them, these women of courage for the first time announcing their distress on so many roundabouts!" He saw them? But on what roundabout did he go to talk with them? And that he had not already gassed previously?

Admittedly, measures of "economic and social urgency" have been announced: they will however be insufficient to stop a movement from the depths of the Real Country. For if the most impoverished, destitute employees and pensioners in particular, need that financial aid simply to survive, the French, just do not want to be content to survive! They no longer want to be satisfied with the charity of the oligarchy! Moreover, Brussels has already expressed its concern about the cost of these aids.

The blind repression that falls on the French will change nothing. Macron, from now on, speaks to the French only through tear gas, flash-bangs and armored gendarmerie decorated with the EU flags!

Action Française calls on all French people to defend their dignity and their freedoms among the Yellow Vests. We solemnly call for the resignation of Macron and the writing, by the citizens themselves, throughout the Territories, of notebooks of grievances. It is up to them to make their voices heard directly!

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 6604186d044036c⋯.png (1.45 MB, 1282x542, 641:271, Macron.PNG)


Vive Macron! Vive la république!


Monarchism in France is only popular with weird oldies who are totally disconnected from reality

Action Francaise and all other Monarchist orgs basically died after they had a brief resurgence during the Vichy regime because of their association with Vichy and treason in general

If these riots succede in shifting the French political Labdscape it will either result in a reactionary (though not Monarchist) Republic with Gaullist characteristics

Or a renewed republic with further Social-Democratic / Orthodox-Marxist

File: dc41155b6602734⋯.jpg (201.72 KB, 1280x640, 2:1, The-Second-Bourbon-Restora….jpg)


We must work together to restore our once great monarchs to their stolen thrones. What once was shall be again in the ruins of a Europe that has been raped by liberal and republican thought for centuries. Ideas on how to spread support for the restoration of the monarchs are most sincerely welcomed.

3 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: aa5269fca12f065⋯.jpg (40.63 KB, 570x424, 285:212, 272061c0a47565c3189a62f361….jpg)

File: 65a31dfc416d86f⋯.jpg (30.56 KB, 400x400, 1:1, 0312804012.jpg)



Can we just respect each other's views?

This board has an autistic divide.

We're like Chinese legalists and Chinese Confucians.

Except some people think regicide is a virtuous thing and Confucians themselves had the Mandate of Heaven


File: e694c92bebd5f40⋯.jpg (21.03 KB, 480x360, 4:3, 86988-089.jpg)

No more of this "true monarchist" crap.


File: 0d7a4aedada5369⋯.png (520.7 KB, 437x523, 437:523, sdhu8b9rb.PNG)


This is all I ask of any good monarchist comrade, we both have the interest of the monarchy at heart as do all monarchist.


What about the Liechtenstein idea, where you give localities legal right to secession in exchange for monarchism?



Also, we should be looking at Georgia. They've been having a lot of support for the crown recently. So, I think we should be looking their to emulate their success.

File: 088d62b68e2988b⋯.jpg (46.36 KB, 388x442, 194:221, Grace_chan2.jpg)


A land for our beloved Grace, waifu of the monarchists. All power to Her Grace.

smh, there are few OCs. if drawfags volunteer for the fatherland, plz draw w/o glasses btw thx

48 posts and 35 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



Just realized how shitty the cropping is on the second one, maybe I'll be bothered to fix it later.


File: f0117d4e59231e0⋯.png (948.79 KB, 1200x1200, 1:1, Anchovy_and_grace.png)

File: a4e47bf065ae5dc⋯.png (3.21 MB, 2500x2500, 1:1, Anchovy_and_grace06.png)



Good drawing but Grace needs to put on a skirt.




I'd accept this.





This other OC is absolutely gorgeous as well. However, Kuruminha should be using her makeup thing (the red rectangle line of the tribe of Tupinamba). 10/10

File: c02510e171fd2b7⋯.jpg (49.61 KB, 474x704, 237:352, th.jpg)

File: a0822efe15401c7⋯.jpg (255.99 KB, 1280x837, 1280:837, Cp8QpD2VIAAw-WW.jpg large.jpg)


For a reason unknown to me, the concept of a king alone aggros people on the board. Or, at least, it had brought about aggro in the past. What is absolute? A monarchy where the king is solely king and this authority is inviolable and typically unfettered and the top of temporal hierarchy. That is the easiest way I would clarify it. The rule of the monarch, at the top of the hierarchy, with the other members of the hierarchy. As Maistre defined it, 'a centralized aristocracy'. It isn't limited to Western civilization. Absolute monarchy comes in different forms. It has manifested itself throughout the ages. The sole role of monarchs as sovereigns is nothing new.

>absolutism is all about 'arbitrary' power, 'totalitarianism', 'big gubmit', 'the modern state', 'social contract theory'.

This is a big misconception. People tend to throw around a word salad without really defining their terms. Throwing words like 'authoritarian' and 'totalitarian' as if they were one and the same annoys me to death. Is monarchy an 'authoritarian' structure? Indefinitely, I think, because the institution relies on authority of great spiritual foundation, culture, justice, and the family. To despise all authority is to deprive all people of rights, actions as fathers, and their own self-autonomy. Authority is spread across the board, not limited to only the government, but the entire state of sovereignty. Parents have authority. People have authority over their property. Teachers have authority over students. People have authority in the things they produce and create. Authority is in initiative and intuitiveness. Authority is nothing limited to the state, but it does consist with hierarchy and control. Sovereignty extends to the entire state of living in a particular realm, not limited or separated to the government. It is propriety and authority across the board, vertical within a hierarchy and the dominion of monarchy, church, and people. It is right and wrong because the character of monarchies is so unrestricted to ideologies, even absolutism itself, that it really depends on the character of the monarch.

>absolutism is modernism/Enlightenment

This is right and wrong. It depends on how you view wPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

4 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 3f4c2f12c0a241b⋯.jpg (91.27 KB, 960x720, 4:3, 1446450388105.jpg)


This is a misconception on the term of absolutism.

It's not my fault democracies are so totalitarian and arbitrary in their nature, but not absolutist. Why does the divine character and unmitigated authority of kings bother people? Why is authority such a bad word in the modern era?


File: d7b0f0fe9ef7f0b⋯.jpg (20.76 KB, 376x442, 188:221, 02.jpg)

>hurr durr you're basically communists

This is why I hate half of you with a passion.



That picture gave me cancer



Ok you commie.


File: dac9fee5cfae615⋯.jpg (26.15 KB, 350x350, 1:1, 0312804012_1_35.jpg)

This board has become divided between Chinese legalists and Chinese Confucians. Except Confucians observe the Mandate of Heaven

File: c4b3832ace38bbc⋯.jpg (71.71 KB, 560x538, 280:269, lutherNailingItHome.jpg)


Was the Protestant Reformation a mistake?

68 posts and 15 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



Speaking on behalf of the Catholic Church and the role of Emperors in Western civilization, my ideal would have been the respect for the temporal authority of emperors and the spiritual domain of the church in the whole realm of sovereignty. This is a long-standing issue that re-occurs everywhere and goes beyond just Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant. The Divine Right of Kings and their temporal authority, to rule by the Grace of God, is constantly undermined for republican principles. Ideally, I do think a unified Christendom is ideal.

>Dante Alighieri and De Monarchia studying the temporal authority of the Emperor and the Pope. Not to mention the Divine Comedy.

>Emperors and their confrontation with the coronation process to 'lose their crowns', so to speak.

>King Louis XIV and the conflicts with the Catholic Church as a temporal political authority

>Stuarts and the conflicts with the Puritans

I think the Reformation was a continuation down this path and don't really hold animosity between Catholics, Protestants, and Orthodox Christians, but for the unity of Christendom in the spirit of Christ.



>Half-Nigger President

>Zionist President who let his daughter marry a Jew


>Getting filled with Pablos

>56% White

>Not being a monarchy

>Sided with Stalin



Yet it's still whiter and more Christian than your country, Muhammad







File: 360f20a441e0c6b⋯.jpg (8.11 KB, 501x585, 167:195, 35973318_1768299019882683_….jpg)


I've been pondering on this idea for a while now. While I am an avid monarchist, and have zero respect for democracy, I am concerned that the purely libertarian 'possession'-based idea of monarchy is a bit too easy to subvert by (((them))). After all, royal marriages of Kings, Dukes etc. in the olden days were ones of political power, with little regard for the nationality of the spouse or her family's lineage, and sometimes with no regard for the nationality of the King (e.g. Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth comes to mind straight away). This means that powerful investors, bankers and speculators who, despite coming form an aristocratic family with powerful connections, would in no way benefit the volk of the nation as they would ultimately be driven by their own greed and end goals of subversion. Society would be very much at risk these days in particular, since most rich people with aristocratic backgrounds have come in contact with the globalist Jewry at some point, and even those who have never been heard of (for example, Emanuel Macron, supposedly a nobody entering politics yet possessing an aristocratic etiquette and approach, but in reality a businessman with a past of deals and acquaintances with the Rothschilds) have some dirty history behind them.

National Socialism seemed to have fixed this, in a sense. It held firm in authority, with a centralised chain of command where the Furher could be likened to a King or Emperor, and his advisors, the King's court. The difference is that instead of going HAM on the idea of private property, it instead cultivated the idea of a strong identity, where every man could claim Germany as his own, the nation being shared in the volk. Every man, regardless of his position in society, could celebrate his nation's culture, past, tradition, and yet still, the real power was held in a tightly-regulated chain of command. It gave people a sense of unity, and very much held up that idea through the Hitler-jugend, the League of German Girls and many social programmes that helped people build a sense of national and racial unity.

In a certain sense, you could see the Reich as an extremely centralised Empire. The Fuhrer, whose will to act came as a blessing from God, was the overseer of his Empire, the guardian of his people; a man who stood in the tPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

9 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



National socialism is the anti-thesis of monarchy.It has its roots in democracy, and let's not forget that it is socialistic to the core, which means that it disregards hierarchies, and in this case, every racial member of a group counts as the same. That goes against monarchy, because monarchy insinuates that people are not equal, and even citizens of a country are not equal.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.




>Not mentioning 'daddy's credit card' from the US

>Not mentioning Israel came to be thanks to the same powers that created the 2nd republic

Thanks for the chuckle, it really made my day xD



2nd republic of what?



2nd republic of Poland (druga rzeczpospolita). I thought it was obvious from the context of the video.

File: 2ec7806d1903d58⋯.jpg (77.85 KB, 435x580, 3:4, prince-william-435-74.jpg)


So rumor on the interwebs and tabloids is that Prince William confronted the Queen with evidence that Charles killed Diana. This has led the Queen to make William the new Crown Prince. Can anyone confirm this? There is alot of conflicting news out there.

What going on out there UK?

5 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 37e452531a9cdd4⋯.jpg (60.15 KB, 300x400, 3:4, Louis_XIV_as_Child.jpg)


>Anyway, /monarchy/ who would you rather Ascend to the UK throne:

>Prince Charles the Duke of Cornwall or Prince William the Duke of Cambridge?

That's a really tough question.

Why limit it to them? Just put Prince George of Cambridge in line and declare a child regency. He could grow up to become a fierce autocrat like pic related. Whip parliament into shape.


>>5333 (checked)

>why limit it to them

They are the two subjects of the orginal post's topic. To me they seem to be the most qualified.

>child regency

Never considered that. Who would be the acting regent though?



It should return to Georg Friedrich and the House of Prussia.



>who would you rather


>i prefer this one

Stop thinking like republicans




File: fb5cd0c2f86aa6c⋯.png (238.59 KB, 454x801, 454:801, the_emperor.png)


It goes against the natural order.

A personal lament from a long time ago, reading an older book, and seeing the words "British Empire" when in those days there was such a thing. Today? No empires. No emperor. Only popular sovereignty. Only the People establish governments. This needs to be corrected.

57 posts and 33 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 92a4cf0da9e16fc⋯.png (209.35 KB, 975x503, 975:503, d898h3r.png)

I don't know why I bother with certain nationalists.

They are never appeased. Fascists exclusively are tolerable.

Fascists don't have a Mein Kampf that denotes no love for dynastic patriotism and rejects monarchy this way.


File: 431aed5949caabf⋯.jpg (38.32 KB, 357x500, 357:500, e2af7accf3b8a6b547d67a2ed4….jpg)

It's easy to boast about taking Paris when you didn't fight a 2-front war from the start. Imperial Germany already had that glory to begin with. It's part of the reason the French showed so much resistance a 2nd time. Afterwards they were boastful until WW2.


File: ecc41957030919f⋯.mp4 (8.56 MB, 480x360, 4:3, Die_Trommel_schlägt_und_sc….mp4)

File: 37c7aaa03b1907c⋯.mp4 (5.78 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Fridericus_Rex_Grenadierma….mp4)


File: 6679a03a75e1b33⋯.mp4 (5.31 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Heil_dir_im_Siegerkranz_✠_….mp4)

File: 3f5163e8e847a13⋯.mp4 (6.82 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Preußenlied_✠_[Anthem_of_P….mp4)

Germans will find their spirit to survive.

There is a hope and resilience against terrible odds.



>Germans will find their spirit to survive.

[citation needed]

File: 232a6bba7963479⋯.jpg (120.32 KB, 800x460, 40:23, venice-golden.jpg)


What does this board think about the Most Serene Republic of Venice, and the golden age it ushered in that lasted for more than a thousand years? Does this board like the idea of an aristocratic republic, not a monarchy but a republic ruled by elites and powerful families?

15 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



im not spooked so im an egoist

i dont live only for today, i invest for future and i try to make my personality virtuous



>he's proud of his half-Dindu grandson.



im also an antinatalist ;)



So a pussy then.



im more than you, animal

Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / doomer / eris / monarchy / newbrit / vg / vichan / vietnam / x ]