[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/pdfs/ - Rare and supressed books

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1432383454659.png (2.71 MB, 2352x4032, 7:12, 1432377521413.png)

ff71a0 No.1456

/pol/ has recently been raided, the catalog and some threads will be posted here in pdf format until a better archiving solution is found.

ff71a0 No.1457

File: 1432383957062.pdf (6.25 MB, 1.pdf)


ea3dec No.1458

>>1457

thanks anon


ff71a0 No.1459

File: 1432384395021.pdf (5.98 MB, 2.pdf)

2/4


ff71a0 No.1460

File: 1432384923136.pdf (6.7 MB, 3.pdf)

3/4

Should say these are for the catalog, the entire OP is saved for all 25 pages.


ff71a0 No.1461

File: 1432385769390.pdf (6.42 MB, 4.pdf)

4/4

That's all from me, not sure when this raid started so this is the best I can do.

If you find a thread that interests you in either the picture or in the pdfs get the number and try out the URL in archive.is or browse through these listings

https://archive.is/search/?q=https://8ch.net/pol/res/20*

https://archive.is/search/?q=https://8ch.net/pol/res/21*


6e208c No.1462

/POL/ IS UNDER HEAVY ATTACK

ARCHIVE THREADS NOW


f405fa No.1471

File: 1432393510701.pdf (5.09 MB, Cuckelodeon Thread 4_ Info….pdf)

Lost Cuckelodeon 4 thread

1/3


bd122e No.1476

File: 1432395358672-0.pdf (418.65 KB, 12 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)

File: 1432395358672-1.pdf (2.84 MB, 17 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)

File: 1432395358672-2.pdf (2.13 MB, 19 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)

Trying this again


bd122e No.1478

File: 1432395458881-0.pdf (2.19 MB, 21 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)

File: 1432395458881-1.pdf (2.8 MB, 23 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)

File: 1432395458881-2.pdf (2.66 MB, 24 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)


bd122e No.1479

File: 1432395552307-0.pdf (2.66 MB, 26 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)

File: 1432395552308-1.pdf (2.22 MB, 28 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)

File: 1432395552308-2.pdf (1.57 MB, 29 - _pol_ - Cuckelodeon T….pdf)


31d8dc No.1480

BO here, thank you man.

I write my mail to hotwheels.

Here is the Board transfer thread I started. Got eventually slid.

https://archive.is/42K92


3a1438 No.1507

>>1480

Don't be so quick to all of a sudden say "/pol/ is good again.", we haven't seen any significant changes so far, not even in functionality.

>still no .pdf allowed

>still no .swf allowed

>still 3 images

>only fucking board that doesn't have archiving, mods get to pick and choose what gets archived with that retarded sticky, so much for "does not represent the opinions of the moderation"


ff71a0 No.1510

>>1507

>still no .pdf allowed

Good, it promotes post board participation like we're seeing here. And it's a massive security issue as well.

>only fucking board that doesn't have archiving

>mods get to pick and choose what gets archived

Users need to take a few extra steps to archive what is important to them and have personal backups that can't be taken down or compromised. And look at what this attack shows, practically nothing is being archived by them. If it weren't for tabs still being left open for screencaps to be made or people using archive.is we'd have nothing. If there are private archives being made of /pol/ nobody has stepped forward to provide copies of them, chances are they aren't being maintained by people that like what /pol/ is.

Depending on a single archive as a solution to this issue is a terrible idea. If this site changes the code slightly that archive stops working, I've seen it happen several times already. That archive has a bit of downtime and the posts aren't archived either. It's a great service but it also gives a false sense of security.

Also my pdfs have a red box where the embedded youtube videos should be and a URL or title for the video isn't provided. There are 111 youtube links in the html file that I'll post here in case anyone wants them.


3a1438 No.1511

>>1510

>Users need to take a few extra steps to archive what is important to them and have personal backups that can't be taken down or compromised.

A lot of them do that by default, even on halfchan which has 4plebs to archive for them. Indeed not as much, but still nonetheless.

>Depending on a single archive as a solution to this issue is a terrible idea.

It is not really a matter of having that purely for archiving purposes, for that you could just use the shit we already have, you could even paste shit in a notepad. The main reason to ever want a special archiving site is so that you could search, filter and analyse, which is something that screencaps and archive.is do not provide. I am the one that looks after the /polarchive/ shill thread and having analytic tools for only 4chan is a pain in the ass.

>If this site changes the code slightly that archive stops working, I've seen it happen several times already. That archive has a bit of downtime and the posts aren't archived either. It's a great service but it also gives a false sense of security.

This I can agree with, but I am certain that quite a few other Anons are also aware of this, as shown by the fact that the GG boards use archive.is even though they already get archives for their board.


ff71a0 No.1512

>>1510

It was 111 mentions of youtube not individual videos, here are all the embedded links in order

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18gU4HSkW9Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_xgecR0ifo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnu5uW9No8g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pElWcmgVd0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Sm5rpDQrgM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mn7mrEfW10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObTdO_a3bZk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eLHoh7NzM0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21VFUBLikaY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn3Cc1Wu7j4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUH9uyeX6oA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CgQITcfJd0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5LZd2vuzgw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Sx0Wr-uT0s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAcsQeuMrFc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ07CINbFoE

? https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6Orgn4rWKMT0vwadtmZu8g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB7Cfmmxm1E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qs7yljgKQy0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqIiKVPdV1A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRaw1A7REzs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mlw2mlf35Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ghw22PCdyRM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N21u3qjNg8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT12WH4a92w

For anybody here who uses a script similar to this one https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/413-youtube-link-title

Go ahead an repost this with all the titles given properly, I don't use youtube unless it's with youtube-dl and it would be to much work for me when someone else can do it in 3-4 clicks.


ff71a0 No.1513

>>1511

I just noticed how archives links are dealt with on /pol/ in the sticky after having ignored it for months thinking it was only about /polmeta/. You're absolutely right that the way this is handled on the part of the moderation there isn't functional as an archive. It's working fine as an outdated "best of /pol/" selection of topics for lurkers though.

And I'm only interested in archiving in a manner that makes material available to people who are looking for it and active members of our community. If there is enough demand for something and someone has a private archive and shares it the system works. Screencaps are an important part of our internet heritage that grew out of FAQ files. It's not our job to make future historians or current researchers lives easier, we already have enough on our plate.


2abef9 No.1577

File: 1432891397744.pdf (39.02 KB, Henry Kuttner - Year Day .pdf)

>>1507

pol has been censored from day 1 on 8ch

this isnt the real pol

what made pol pol was a "hands off moderation" and moot defending it as "our glorious bastion of free speech"

8ch pol is a travesty, a jew trap

the BO and his mods can delete and ban whatever they want, and do

"shitposting", "spam", "off topic" are all vague rules designed to be abused

only hotwheels' stance about censorship works for free speech: you only delete what is strictly illegal

pol on 8ch was never good

it serves as a killer of western free speech

<random pdf file


2abef9 No.1578

File: 1432891577852.pdf (617.32 KB, A Course in Miracles - Wor….pdf)

>>1480

>We need a stronger hand against shitposting, more volunteers (around the clock not only burgers), more active volunteers, volunteers interacting more with the community.

lol

8ch pol was never pol


dc2855 No.1620

>>1577

>what made pol pol was a "hands off moderation" and moot defending it as "our glorious bastion of free speech"

Except that this is not true. The moderation was lax simply due to the fact that the mods rarely bothered to show up and when they did, they often censored actual discussion.

Remember how the sticky was never enforced even when the half/pol/ mods showed up to do something?

Remember how certain topics would become "taboo" for brief periods of time?

Remember cuck porn was allowed to stay on the board when discussion on things like government surveillance would randomly 404 for no reason?

The difference between half/pol/ before GG and full/pol/ now is that half/pol/ mods showed up less frequently, there is no other difference. Full/pol/ is bad not because of censorship but because of blatant inconsistency. /baphomet/ is the definition of a hugbox and yet barely anyone seems to shit on them for it, this is due to the fact that the mods there are consistent in what they want to see on the board and largely people are fine with it. On 8/pol/ you switch between cycles of overmoderation and no moderation whatsoever, the mods didn't do shit to protect against raids but whenever someone said "suspicious", they would get banned, leading to both /pol/acks and non-/pol/acks hating them.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]