/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate and #NotYourShield

Internet-only? haha no

IRL with people you have pre-existing relationships with, possibly. Only because they'd at least have a chance of being open to your ideas and input potentially.

At this point, online, it's casting pearls before swine; you can't convince people unwilling to consider your ideas or entertain your line of thought for even a moment. The only time these people switch sides, like Ian Cheong Wong-Bong is when they have a personal epiphany in their own life, usually due to a falling out with an anti they were worshipping, or becoming romantically involved with someone who isn't SJW. It's like arguing with a smoker, your words aren't going to make them quit, or even not smoke for the day.

the SPJ was exactly that, an official Olive branch. see where that went?

of course you can also now point at the SPJ as an example of GG properly arguing their position, in a civil manner, even if you take into account the lack of opposition, the journo did that part at least

>>306708

ah, its also why they still try to stop GG from speaking, banning in university and else, cuz everytime we show up, they lose credibility

aGG, generally, believes that dialog amounts to lending us credibility.

However, aGG is not a monolith, so if you have aGG friends, you might be able to get them to hang out and talk about stuff, however anything that they say means no more to the loose collective that is people who oppose GG than anything you might say would carry weight with some random GG anon. You'll all just be speaking as individuals.

Generally speaking, though, spending time socially with people you disagree with is absolutely worth it.

IRL encounters with aGG in a undocumented event will likely have false accusations thrown at us. Wouldn't recommend it.

>>306719

can we have grape?

I seem to recall feeling this way last christmas. I quickly changed.

Sorry, this is war. They're not going to party with us any more than they'd party with isis or the kkk, to them its all the same. They 've had plenty of opportunity to join the discussion and they prefer their hugboxes. meeting us would mean they'd have to see us as people, which would lead to doubt in their righteous crusade.

Yes, throw a party. We can use that chance to doxx them all at once. Great idea leader!

>>306699

>I've been thinking that it might be nice to try to foster a civil and compassionate dialogue with the other side

SPJ was months ago, OP. Personall i think we win more by focusing on bystanders of the discussion.

>>306724

>bring aggros on to 8chan

But anon, we already have GGR. Every aggro that might join us here already has.

They might even be OP.

>>307058

And the kickoff was a year before SPJ.

I'm not saying I agree with >>306701 and that they'll NEVER act in good faith, but they haven't done so yet and after a year and change of dealing with the back-biting borderline sociopaths of social justice, it's some serious magical thinking to assume they miraculously might just because Odin is going break into their homes dressed in a suit stained red with the blood of his slain foes, to fuck around with their smallclothes and watch them while they sleep as he chugs brandy by the pint.

Clearly you haven't been paying much attention. We've spent over a year trying to open up a civil dialogue, and our detractors have spent over a year trying to make sure we aren't heard. This time will be no different. You're welcome to try, of course, just don't feel dejected when it fails like every other time we've tried to have a respectful conversation.

>>306699

We did try to have respectful dialogue. They called us racists, sexists, terrorists, ebola, and a lot of names that showed their obsession with everything scatological in an attempt to keep anyone from listening to anything we say.

If you want to try, go for it. Just don't be surprised when they won't even entertain the idea that you aren't literally the devil. Social Justice IS a cult and listening to anyone that isn't indoctrinated is a cardinal sin.

>>307058

aGG is boring clique of people I give nary a shit about, and only a tiny fragment of a political force that needs to be purged and to have its lands salted.

>>306699

you know how the german and allied soldiers called a truce and had a snowball fight on Christmas? it's not going to be like that with aGG, they'll call in bomb threats on you and laugh. if they show up in person, they'll scream that you're raping them and get you arrested. you are mentally retarded for thinking that there can be any sort of respectful dialogue with SJW cultists.

>>306719

this. cult fits better than religion though.

You can try.

>>306701

It's more like the SJs that would be privy to such acts instead just say "Fuck it I'm done" and go back to whatever dorkus fandumb thing they were doing before this.

So no, no xmas truce, it'll always be all gg boards everywhere unified against utter fanatics led by a handful of scam artists and UN cuckolds.