/gamergatehq/ - HULKAMANIA is running WILD!

Ryulong was vandalbinned on RationalWiki. Previous thread: >>308455

Ryulong is now getting his fix by edit warring with the administrators on Digimon and Bleach wikias.

https://np.red*dit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3vwjwo/on_rationalwiki_ryulong_is_now_indefinitely/cxrf3rz

RationalWiki is asking us to help them fix the article.

https://np.red*dit.com/r/GGdiscussion/comments/3wb6rd/fix_rationalwikis_gamergate_article/

Vordrak tried that and was preemptively blocked as a known problem user on the advice of Gooniepunk who claimed to be "very familiar" with the activities that got Vordrak blocked on Wikipedia.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=1587798&oldid=1587677

Vordrak went to KiA and complained.

https://archive.is/8vXBZ

EDiot Michaeldsuarez published an email from Vordrak seeking information on RWers Gooniepunk and Typhoon, and Vordrak wrote an article accusing RW admin David Gerard of supporting pedophilia and threatening to out Gooniepunk, proving the RWers right about him.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=1588281&oldid=1588279

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Typhoon#Since_you_were_an_ED_user.2C_I_owe_you_a_heads-up

http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=2855

Google and Wikipedia are teaming up to base a knowledge engine on the data in Wikipedia. Weirdly, a research group at Dresden Technical University scrubbed its website of the mention that Wikidata is an input for Google Knowledge Graph. SEO people are already trying to come up with ways to abuse the system.

From /v/:

NEW WIKISHIT: THINKSERIOUS EDITION

READ THIS FIRST

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-12-02/Op-ed

SHORTER VERSION

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/08/wikidata_special_report/

WPO THREAD, Start here:

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7118#p165643

GOOGLE EMPLOYEES/WMF BOARD MEMBERS COVERING SHIT UP?

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7118#p166273

WIKIDATA BEING ABUSED FOR SEO?

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7118#p165934

From the offtopic general:

> If anyone hasn't been following the Frank Gaffney stuff on /r/WikiInAction, the cancer there has been worse than Gamergate. Someone rewrote the article to be a transparent hit piece and the admins are banning everyone who questions the neutrality of the change as "sockpuppets". They just banned two editors who hadn't been involved in the area in months because someone accused a new editor of being one of them. Compare the treatment of this BLP to Zoe Quinn!

Here's the story:

https://np.red*dit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3vxgj9/the_gaffney_edit_war_continues_after_donald_trump/

> The edit wars over Frank Gaffney and his Center for Security Policy has started up again in light of an poll cited by Donald Trump that the Center did on Muslims in the United States. Regardless of whether you like Gaffney or the poll, he is being bashed in the media by lazy reporters who are lifting text from the extremely biased Wikipedia pages on him and the Center.

Here's the background from WiA:

https://np.red*dit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3q758l/the_frank_gaffney_edit_war/

TV Tropes is banning users for being antifeminist.

Evidence:

http://imgur.com/gallery/XQiL6

WiA thread:

https://np.red*dit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3wk458/xpost_rsocialjusticeinaction_tvtropes_mods_caught/

Does anyone know if Orain/AllTheTropes ever recovered from their DNS hijacking? Their Facebook page has not updated since they were hit.

>>309161

TV Tropes is a shit.

Anything involving rape makes me cringe because the naked agenda pushing by their feels-based vagina cult.

>>309161

>TV Tropes is banning users for being antifeminist.

They've been doing that for many years.

Salvidrim posted something to WiA last week:

> Kirill & Keilana (ArbCom candidates) appointed to Wikimedia DC board of Directiors as Prez & VP

https://np.red*dit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3vtf1e/kirill_keilana_arbcom_candidates_appointed_to/

Is this only plain news or a hint to dig here? DC is a wretched hive of scum and villainy that is full of awful people who would want to influence the 'pedia for nefarious reasons. On the other hand, Salvidrim has spoken highly of Kirill in the past and I have nothing on Keilana.

I remember having fun reading TVTropes. Now it's just another tumblr clone.

Looks like Wikipedia just keeps on getting worse. That abusive hypocritical anti-GG piece of shit Gamaliel just got elected to a 1-year arbcom term.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2015#Results

>>309207

Yeah, that was the first beachhead in the SJW takeover. It seems so obvious in hindsight.

>>309161

>Question the great god SocJus? Banned. Also, you should not be allowed in society, subhuman.

They aren't even trying to sugarcoat it. Social justice warriors are fucking nazis and they control everything now.

The same people behind the destruction of the Cultural Marxism article (which formerly referred to a documented school of philosophy that was different from the modern usage) are planning to merge Cultural Marxism with the article on Cultural Bolshevism. On what grounds? Cultural Bolshevism was a Nazi propaganda term in the 1930s, so they can use Wikipedia to call anyone using the term "Cultural Marxism" a Nazi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cultural_Bolshevism

>>309456

That's not wrong though. That's exactly where this stupid bullcrap originated from.

A kekworthy response to Wikipedia's donation drives:

https://twitter.com/DocBray/status/677241891511996416

>>309549

>That's exactly where this stupid bullcrap originated from

Do you know any history nigger? I don't like commies but bolsheviks wouldn't take any of this marxist/SJW bullshit, most of them considered gays to be degenerates and a product of the bourgeois society that needed to be "cured" by sending them to die in a gulag

They gave zero fucks about feminism and wouldn't have laughed at faggot terms like 'microaggression'

>>309740

I think hes saying that cultural Marxism was used as a weapon against the west.

Theres a neat video of some KGB dude explaining that was their plan to erode western societies during the cold war by destroying religion and the family unit. And setting women against men, gays against straights, atheists against religious popele, blacks against whites etc.

We do know that feminist and gay rights organizations (for example) sprang from the failed of communist parties in Europe and the US in the 70's.

Till be interesting to see

>>309863

I wanna see this.

>>310010

It might have been one of these:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsBMfGwyPE8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA

The polscifags on this board love to watch Yuri.

The retards at ANI are claiming that "cripple" and "bastard" are as offensive as "nigger" and are going after a veteran for using the words correctly and in context.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Offensive_language

Northbysouthbaranof is railroading another editor with false accusations. It's so outrageous that several newbies are pushing back but the admins are holding the line for North.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AE#Nocturnalnow

test

>>310698

Worse still; anyone want to bet that these four fucks conspire to get Ryulong welcomed back with open arms the second he can appeal his ban? Let alone further fucking prevent ANYONE from stopping the shithead from resuming his reign of terror/retaliating against his enemies who got him banned?

>>310702

I don't think Ryulong is ever coming back to Wikipedia to be honest. He burned too many bridges and all the fights he's gotten into on rationalwiki only seem indicate that he's headed further towards a mental breakdown. The original group of POV pushers don't really need to come back anyway because the current cabal is doing a just fine job keeping the article locked in stasis. MarkBernstein, Aquillion, Jorm, Artw, Strongjam, Dumuzid, Woodroar, and the obvious sockpuppets PeterTheFourth and ForbiddenRocky have worked tirelessly to maintain their propaganda piece and make everyone interested in a neutral, encyclopedia article fight tooth and nail to change even a single word.

>>310705

Hah, and just now I noticed one of them removed the "This article is outdated…" tag a couple days ago even though the article is indeed still missing a bunch of recent stuff.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=696572388

I guess when a "discussion dies" that means you're free to change something contentious.

The WMF board fired James Heilman, who goes by Doc James on the wiki. No word yet on a cause.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=7237

ArbCom banned administrator Soap from Wikipedia for alleged harassment off-wiki, which is not in ArbCom's jurisdiction, based on secret evidence. The rumor mill says Soap got in a flamewar with GorillaWarfare on IRC and she made it an ArbCom issue, but I don't know how true that is. Maybe someone will leak logs.

https://np.red*dit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3yqkos/soap_admin_in_ostensibly_good_standing_suddenly/

Soap evaded his ban and accused MJ94 of trying to hack his account.

> Hey do you think Ive forgotten you tried to compromise my admin account? Forget it, I dont want your "sympathy". Youre just mad your easy prey is gone. Go away. Hand Sanitizer Bottle (talk) 08:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=697403719

> Stop, please, with the crocodile tears. You tried to compromise my admin account as soon as I went "weak". Get out of Wikipedia now. IStandwhenIP (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=697462405

ArbCom banned The Devil's Advocate for unspecified "misconduct".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#The_Devil.27s_Advocate_banned

His last contribution was in October, so it is not clear what this was about.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/The_Devil's_Advocate

>>311360

I'm really interested in this one. Devil's Advocate was a force for good who kept Wikipedia's increasingly biased and corrupt administration honest.

>>311360

Also I notice GorillaWarfare actually recused herself this time.

>>311360

Also it's real fucking interesting that this happens the very day that that corrupt anti-GG piece of shit Gamaliel comes in for the 2016 ArbCom period.

>>311425

> Also it's real fucking interesting that this happens the very day that that corrupt anti-GG piece of shit Gamaliel comes in for the 2016 ArbCom period. You think it's a vendetta?

TDA presented evidence in the ArbCom case against Gamaliel and other admins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate#Statement_by_The_Devil.27s_Advocate

>>311425

> Also it's real fucking interesting that this happens the very day that that corrupt anti-GG piece of shit Gamaliel comes in for the 2016 ArbCom period.

TDA presented evidence in the ArbCom case against Gamaliel and other admins. You think it's a vendetta?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate#Statement_by_The_Devil.27s_Advocate

Does any one have a bullet point list of bad faith wikipedians and details from arbcom? I think 2016 we need to strike Wikipedia harder than ever on all fronts we need to spread word of corrupt actors like gorillawarfare and gamaliel

>>311434

I wouldn't be surprised to be honest. This IP user's comment was apt:

>I think the more likely reason this is secret is because our new social justice Arbs are calling something harassment which normal people would not consider harassment. How many more wrongthink bans shall we expect? I'm disgusted that some of these power hungry bullies were "voted" in. 70.56.27.239 (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Naturally, the first thing one of the cocksuckers on the other side does is assume that they're sockpuppeting. "Assume Good Faith" seems to apply to everything except admins.

>>311447

GorillaWarfare's only real misconduct that I'm aware of anyway was failing to recuse herself in the gamergate arbcom case back in Dec 2014 while she was regularly condemning GG from her twitter account.

Gamaliel on the other hand could have a whole page of his own misconduct on around the GG topic area alone.

>>311447

> Does any one have a bullet point list of bad faith wikipedians and details from arbcom?

There was such a list on Wikia and they deleted it on Jimbo's orders, which was at the request of of 5_albert_square. A few people saved backups.

http://pastebin.com/S3hJytxY

> I think 2016 we need to strike Wikipedia harder than ever on all fronts we need to spread word of corrupt actors like gorillawarfare and gamaliel

WikiInAction has been documenting problems but the stories are not taking off.

>>311450

> GorillaWarfare's only real misconduct that I'm aware of anyway was failing to recuse herself in the gamergate arbcom case back in Dec 2014 while she was regularly condemning GG from her twitter account.

She also had been part of a botting group that spammed the hashtag early on. Another member of the group ran the Atheism+ block bot. Not the most honest people to be around.

http://pressfarttocontinue.com/2015/06/03/twitter-bot-army-the-story-of-botally/

So does anyone actually know what they're attempting to call harassment that got The Devil's Advocate blocked? This IP user seems to be aware but try as I might I can't figure out either why he was banned from Wikipedia or Wikipediocracy.

>I know what the so-called evidence is. It isn't hard to find and it certainly isn't anything to be banned over.

>>311456

Oh wow, what a piece of shit.

>>311520

The IP might think the information is not hard to find, but nobody else on WP, WiA, Wikipediocracy, or here seems to be aware of it. Whatever they have found, it might be unrelated to the ban.

>>311520

Haha, and sure enough, that IP is now blocked for "not being here to build an encyclopedia". Guess they said a few too many things that cut too close to home for some. I don't suppose the other IPs commenting with a less harsh tone will have anything done to them though.

>>311534

> Haha, and sure enough, that IP is now blocked for "not being here to build an encyclopedia". Guess they said a few too many things that cut too close to home for some.

It seems like it. Its last edit was revdel'd by the blocking admin as "flagrantly unconstructive". I wonder how that comment compared to the usual screaming of Mark, North, or BMK.

A hidden gem in the comments after ArbCom's recent actions, Juan Riley calls them the Arbitrary Committee.

Slightly related as it's on Wikipedia (and I don't know if this was noticed by others yet): GamerGate quoted as a 'Use case' for the archive.is entry (next to other cases such as Julian Assange and the Syrian Electronic Army).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.is

Heh, seeing some familiar faces show up at this AfD:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Regressive_left

>>310259

> Northbysouthbaranof is railroading another editor with false accusations. It's so outrageous that several newbies are pushing back but the admins are holding the line for North.

One of these newbies, Mouse001, was just banned by JzG for filing a complaint with 20 diffs of personal attacks by Scjessey. It looks like retribution for speaking up against North at the last AE.

A new anti-Wikipedia board launched for people who don't like how Wikipediocracy is run. It's just Eric Barbour and a couple of others for now.

http://wikipediasucks.boards.net/

Wikipediots deleted the article on incels because they think incels are MRAs. An IP accused five participants in the discussion of being meatpuppets. An inactive account returned after a year of inactivity to threaten the career of one of them. Some of the targeted accounts had participated at Talk:GGc and were written up in "Sea Lions of Wikipedia." It looks like there's still some offsite aGG coordination going on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Involuntary_celibacy_%284th_nomination%29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive909#Potential_doxing

I wonder what got these aggros involved.

> Welcome to ChildWiki, the children's liberation encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

> Why The Legality Of Child Pornography Is Relevant To The Youth Liberation Movement

> A Critical Look At the Age of Consent Laws: Who benefits from age of consent laws?

https://archive.is/s6Fze from https://archive.is/QWGXJ and https://archive.is/kdh1B

Sitush went to AN asking for topic bans of aGG SPAs. The convo developed into people rehashing "Yup it sucks" and nothing happened.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Topic_bans_for_Gamergate.3F

Off topic, Nakon indeffed lulzer EEng as WP:NOTHERE. Other admins want him unblocked because they liked him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Review_of_EEng.27s_indefinite_block

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EEng

This may be interesting:

> Jimbo, was the WMF board fully aware of Arnnon Geshuri's central role in a major anticompetitive scandal at Google when they approved his appointment?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#New_WMF_trustee_Arnnon_Geshuri

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cullen328/Arnnon_Geshuri

>>311360

According to this Wikipediocracy thread even TDA doesn't know why he was banned.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=7249&start=200

>So I emailed TDA, and apparently he has no clue why he was banned. They banned him without contacting him and the first he heard about it was when he got the ban notice put on his userpage.

Lilburne at WO describes Wikipedia's processes as Byzantine.

> Lots of protocols, and bizarre rituals. A central system disconnected from reality, minor flunkies puffing up their authority and making life difficult for the peasants. All fueled by bribery and corruption.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7264#p169314

Barbour gives a history lesson of people that Jimbo fucked over

http://wikipediasucks.boards.net/thread/21/jimbo-drove-over-people-bus

>>311979

> there were 300+ women raped in just one city in Germany

Got a source for that? From what I've read about Cologne there were lots of sexual assaults but no reported rapes, and most reports of a mass rape were the media hyping it up. Doing some quick research, two sources say there was one report of rape in Cologne.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/12082366/German-women-report-string-of-sexual-assaults-by-Arab-and-North-African-men.html

http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/coordinated-attacks-on-women-in-cologne-were-unprecedented-germany-says/

>>311979

Additional info (I was distracted by yuri):

it happened New Years Eve

there were organized rape gangs

ALL of the attackers were Muslim

most of the attackers were immigrants or refugees

One of the attackers who said he was from Syria boldly stated: "German chancellor Merkel invited us here. The police won't do anything." He was right.

A large number of the rapists were caught, effectively, red-handed by police …and were LET GO by police due to "lack of evidence"

There were protests by the victims and the victims families in the following days. The MSM did not cover one of them.

143 police were sent to deal with the Muslim rape-gangs

1500 police were sent to deal with the victim's protest; where the police used water hoses, teargas, and pepper spray to disburse the protesters.

THE MSM BLAMED WHITE PEOPLE AND THE VICTIMS THEMSELVES FOR THE RAPES AND CALLED ANYONE WHO POINTED OUT THAT ALL THE RAPISTS WERE MUSLIM AS RACIST BECAUSE …FEMINISM (vid related)

Feminist support rape if you're the "right" sort of rapist.

New drama at ANI. SimpsonDG, an editor in good standing with contributions going back to 2006, reported Future Perfect to ANI for a bright-line civility violation against StuRat, another editor in good standing with over 20,000 edits. Future's friends circled the wagons.

HighInBC tried to change the subject to SimpsonDG.

NorthBySouthBaranof called for SimpsonDG to be banned as "not here".

Baseball Bugs accused SimpsonDG of wanting to "restrict the content of the discussion" by asking Future Perfect to stop saying things like "fuck off" and "go fuck yourself".

Johnuniq accused SimpsonDG of "add[ing] fuel to the fire" because StuRat had asked admins to remove protection from his own talk page, and called for sanctions on StuRat for being most active in answering questions at the reference desk instead of adding to article space.

Freeatlastchitchat accused SimpsonDG of trollish behavior and said he deserved the incivility directed at StuRat.

Sitush chimed in to call StuRat a troll.

>>311980

Sorry for derailing, but I posted this here because I thought it was universally important for GG. I apologize about derailing.

I blame "twitter accuracy" …and booze.

I'm sorry.

However, the actual crime figures for this one city on this one night are EYE BLISTERING for "assault", "unwanted sexual advances", robbery (no "feely" quotes for stealing your shit) , and actual honest-to-god-rape-is-rape-no-mean-no "sexual assaults" against (white) women… by Muslim men.

This is the actual "RAPE CULTURE" stuff that western feminists whine about; and yet… Muslims are "oppressed" and "must" be protected, according to Cultural Marxism and WHITE PEOPLE are the problem for EVERYTHING; while an actual "rape culture", I.E. (Islam) RAPE ALL THE WHITE WOMANS for being slutty and Western.

>>311971

ArbCom never presented TDA with any evidence against him.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/01/14/banned-wikipedia-admin-exclusive/

TDA guesses that he may have been banned for reporting an undisclosed conflict of interest by an admin.

> on December 21st I sent a report to the Committee about an admin who has over the last ten years been fluffing up the bios of friends and colleagues as well as making negative and even defamatory edits to articles on opponents, all without disclosing a conflict of interest on these topics as required by policy. On more than one occasion this admin has abused administrative privileges on matters where the admin had an undisclosed conflict of interest. I had attempted on my own to prevent the admin from violating the site’s conflict of interest policies by saying via e-mail I would report this conduct to the Committee, and the admin only stopped editing those areas until I was subjected to a three-month block in October. Upon the resumption of this misconduct I requested by e-mail that the admin undo these new violations or disclose a conflict of interest to no avail.

The Wikipedian has a big article on several of the recent happenings. A comment claims the entire board tried to pressure Lila to resign and she refused.

http://thewikipedian.net/2016/01/11/the-crisis-at-new-montgomery-street/

From KiA: [Shitposting Extravaganza] It's Wikipedia's 15th birthday, and they want you to tweet what Wikipedia means to you under the hashtag #wikipedia15. This sounds like fun, why not contribute? (◕‿◕✿) https://twitter.com/hashtag/wikipedia15?src=hash

QEDK took Future Perfect to ArbCom for making a legal threat against him during >>312094. Kirill Loshkin found "the allegation that administrators are enabling harassment by a banned user" - The Rambling Man and Cassianto allowing an IP to comment on their talk pages, with no sign of it being either harassment or a banned user – to be "deeply concerning and further investigation."

A few people are participating in the #wikipedia15 hashtag.

https://twitter.com/GI_Blues/status/688450537105289216

https://twitter.com/Zeroized/status/688449058038517760

Nathalie Collida outed Future Perfect as a German English professor, apparently for the hell of it because his identity was irrelevant to the discussion. Collida also outed Titanium Dragon and Tutelary back in the day IIRC.

https://twitter.com/AuerbachKeller/status/688755140879355904

https://archive.is/Cj7VN

Jimmy Wales is raising money in Abu Dhabi.

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/middle-east/23326-why-is-hanging-out-with-dictators-wrong

>>312264

This is getting pretty juicy.

>>312827

>Collida also outed Titanium Dragon and Tutelary back in the day IIRC.

Got a link to that? I wanna be sure it's the same person.

>>312833

By which I mean something indicating it was that same person who did that shit, not their dox.

>>312833

> Got a link to that? I wanna be sure it's the same person.

Verification is always good. https://archive.is/4soze

The Twitter account has had the Collida name since 2013 and is a "Former writer/researcher for Wikipediocracy" so maybe they've burnt bridges with WO or vice versa.

https://twitter.com/NathalieCollida/

>>312848

What a disgusting piece of shit. Nice to see these assholes eating their own once again though; Future Perfect at Sunrise is one of the corrupt involved-as-fuck admins that helped the GG become what it is today.

>>312897

GG article

>>312897

While ArbCom is hemming and hawing at the idea of maybe saying Future Perfect shouldn't have used such language, they quickly passed a motion condemning The Rambling Man for using milder language after Future Perfect edit warred on his talk page. TRM quit Wikipedia in protest.

They also claimed that the IP's posts that TRM had restored contained "harassment". See for yourself. Is it possible to remove ArbCom members for failing WP:CIR?

https://archive.is/WMCUk

ArbCom had the clerks remove several heated statements, causing protest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Liz#The_Rambling_Man

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=700757892

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&type=revision&diff=700765709&oldid=700764225

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=700760152&oldid=700757892

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=700777979&oldid=700777924

No one seems to be commenting on the reactionary calls at ANI to ban StuRat and SimpsonDG.

Fuck I shouldnt post stuff about Tv Tropes on Infinity but well I can repost it.

>>309161

>This looks like just issue with one page , with one specific thing. Where mods decided to pick one side and end pointless edit war.

It's shitty thing, mods are far from perfect, there are plenty of SJW and other ignorant or naive leftist but claiming that mods are banning users for being antifeminist is overreaction or even lying. Last thing what we need is is overrection and twisting of facts from our side.

>I disagree with what mods doing there , but that guy was picking fight over one issue agaist majority of editors on page and later with mods.

There should be more evidence to mods shit doing than that.

>And from wiki itself, not forums. Forums are lost cause anyway.

Wikipedia is getting less reliable in the last Years. Is Not drama related thing but they suddenly purging infomative articles without notificiation.

ArbCom admitted to have never given TDA notice of the charges against him or the right to defend himself. As several editors are pointing out, this was against ArbCom policy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#Severe_Violation_of_Committee_Policy.3F

>>314076

So glad they're still talking about this. Don't fucking let them get away with this this time.

Strelnikov presents stats on Wikipedia's user base:

http://wikipedia-sucks-badly.blogspot.com/2016/01/some-fun-charts-and-graphs-zzuzz.html

This paragraph stands out:

> Active editors, 2003-2015. Notice that most of the editors are very casual, under twenty edits in total, and that group peaked in 2007. I would guess that a lot of these people are now paid editors. The hardest of hard-core editors are a tiny cadre of maybe 1000 people, probably doing most of their edits by 'bots now. This is not a picture of a stable setup; it reminds me of the Ingsoc Party in Nineteen Eighty-Four. The minority of editors are in the Thought Police or the true leadership cadre, the 25+ people are the rest of the Inner Party, and the casuals are the Winston Smiths of the Outer Party.

We've seen that having less than several thousand edits is by itself grounds for an indefinite block. Someone with 100-200 edits is "clearly WP:NOTHERE." Their number of edits is the evidence against them. Someone who just started out is fucked if they make the mistake of disagreeing with a veteran.

Back in 2006 Aaron Swartz found that "insiders account for the vast majority of the edits. But it’s the outsiders who provide nearly all of the content."

http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia

The argument over TDA is still going on.

> Just stop responding. These are the usual suspects, forward complaints to WMF and see if they will ban these accounts as proxy harassers. Dave Dial (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

He is referring to everyone in the thread who had said that ArbCom should follow its own written policy.

Thank you for keeping us up to date, dear Leader.

>>314331

The fact of the matter is that WP:ARBPOL, as written, requires ArbCom to inform the accused what they have been accused of, where, and given opportunity to defend themselves before a decision is reached. Who was accused, who the accuser was, and the reason why ArbCom violated the polices that hold authority over them is entirely irrelevant. They violated WP:ARBPOL as written and therefore invalidated any and all actions taken as a result of the misconducted hearing. ArbCom must redact these actions until they perform a hearing that does not violate the policy as it is written.

>>314331

Dave Dial says stupid shit all the time, he blubbers hysterically somewhat like Mark Bernstein whenever he's around during a gamergate or gender gap task force discussion.

Ironholds complains that the R programming language is sexist because it has a variable called iGetHead.

https://np.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/43tlcg/programmer_quits_work_on_project_after_getting/

>>314808

well! I thought kiwis were extinct. Silly me!

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katherine_Clark&diff=prev&oldid=702947672

"Reichstag Barkstein" continues with facepalm-worthy incompetence and agenda pushing.

"Clark has been an outspoken opponent of Internet harassment directed at professional women, most notably by Gamergate.[48] After introducing legislation that would criminalize harassment through false police reports in harassment – the Gamergate tactic commonly known as "SWATting" – she was herself targeted by a false report of an active shooter at her home. [49]MarkBernstein (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)"

(Yes, he signed an edit to article space)

A Wikipedia harassment survey's results have come out, with hundreds of Wikipedians claiming that people have uploaded 'revenge porn' of them, among other things.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Harassment_Survey_2015_-_Results_Report.pdf

The revenge porn claims alone have caused lots of people to raise an eyebrow.

Greg Kohs has offended GorillaWarfare by labeling people as "whiners" on the Wikipediocracy thread about the survey.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7329

GorillaWarfare sperged out in the WO thread and on twitter: http://archive.is/WN78L

Does anyone know what this is about?

> Congratulations! You have been chosen at random as the next target for vandalism and trolling. Fear not, it is nothing personal, merely a campaign to undermine the Wikimedia Foundation on behalf of an organisation whose interests are in direct conflict. As such, I have been commissioned to select Users, in this case yourself, and to continually harass them until they leave before selecting a new target. Hopefully you now have a better idea of how this works, you massive, MASSIVE twat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thryduulf&diff=703452648&oldid=703267056

It sounds like someone with a past grudge against Thryduulf.

The Wikimedia Foundation is doing a fine job of undermining itself without anyone else needing to get involved.

Today at ANI, Bishonen banned a user named Aspencork as a "time sink" for knowing that Freidrich Engels (as in "Marx and Engels") advocated for the extermination of the Slavic people and having the sources to back up his arguments against a slew of deniers who had nothing more than their refusal to accept that a leftist could support genocide.

>>315295

There is more to the above drama. Liz reopened the complaint against JzG after Chillum admitted his involvement. A normal user named Tarage overruled Liz (who is now an admin) to close the report and threaten the filer with a block.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive913#Admin_edits_my_post_to_deliberately_change_the_meaning

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarage&diff=703682225&oldid=703678147

Wikipedia on the Iowa caucus: The Democrats had issues. The Republicans had a controversy.

https://voat.co/v/politics/comments/846248

This image hit +1800 on reddit and Wikipedia went on a "sockpuppet" banning rampage

http://imgur.com/RtuM21N

https://np.red*dit.com/r/TumblrInAction/comments/452mlx/privileged_white_race_owned_in_wikipedia/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Talikarni/Archive

>>315927

Speaking of which, all of the various "Pride" articles are on tight lockdown right now.

>>310962

Heilman implies that his firing was due to his opposition to lying about Wikipedia's "track record of success" building search engines while seeking a grant from the Knight Foundation to build a knowledge engine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2016-02-03/In_focus

There is a strange atmosphere of secrecy around Wikipedia's knowledge engine: >>309158

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zo%C3%AB_Quinn#Charges_dropped_against_Eron_Gjoni_.28ex-boyfriend_mentioned_in_article.29

>>309157

>RationalWiki is asking us to help

Come on, nobody should help these buffoons. RationalWiki is a joke, with or without Ryulong. And all of the general encyclopedias are cancerious tumors and they attract the worst people.

Just because it's the first result on Google people still believe in the Wikipedia myth?

>>316102

> Just because it's the first result on Google people still believe in the Wikipedia myth?

People have a tendency to believe the first thing they hear about a subject, and accurate information is difficult to find. Someone has to know about Encyclopedia Dramatica or Know Your Meme to get the facts, and they have to trust these entertainment sites more than the big commercial news outlets.

>>316762 cont'd

The most aggressive POV warrior in the area was not one of the White Priders but their opponent Ratemonth.

> no consensus that salon.com is not NPOV

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_pride&diff=697198197&oldid=6971-53498

> undoing earlier vandalism (restoring the word "racist")

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_pride&diff=704091698&oldid=704091556

> Ylevental made a racist statement on the white pride talkpage, so i do not trust that user's edits

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_pride&diff=704195971&oldid=704168348

Ratemonth telling Jkhall6115 that he knows what Jkhall6115 means better than Jkhall6115 does

> no, that is not what white pride is. your racist statements should be kept off of talk pages just as much as they should kept out of the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:White_pride&diff=prev&oldid=704200491

Ratemonth calling another editor a racist with no justification, and edit warring to remove comments Ratemonth disagrees with

> wikipedia talk pages are not a forum for racists

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:White_pride&diff=prev&oldid=704255185

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:White_pride&diff=prev&oldid=704254993

> (1) wikipedia talk pages are not a forum. 2) racist statements do not belong on the talk page or the article.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:White_pride&diff=prev&oldid=704255616

Ratemonth deleting 12k of commentary and calling people trolls

> again, not a forum. we should not be feeding the trolls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:White_pride&diff=prev&oldid=704341528

For all of this, Ratemonth received one warning for edit warring from EvergreenFir who did something right for once.

Mscuthbert describes the article as "NPOV state"

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_pride&diff=704104162&oldid=704102225

EvergreenFir has decided that academic journals are no longer reliable when he disagrees with them

> Restoring old lead; a single primary source in an obscure journal does not warrant a major change to the definition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_pride&diff=704188674&oldid=704184235

SummerPhDv2.0 gives this reason to reject an influential speech that arguably founded a new definition of white pride

> Charlton Heston is not a reliable source for what "White pride advocates say".

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_pride&diff=704364598&oldid=704294574

To remind everybody, Wikipedia's written policy is that anyone can edit, and "anyone" includes Nazis. If they can behave themselves and produce reliable sources, they are supposed to be treated like any other editor regardless of their personal politics. Chasing after Nazis and running them off the site is a violation of multiple Wikipedia policies including witchhunting, WP:ROPE, and the inevitable personal attacks when the admins accuse more and more people of being Nazis just for disagreeing with how the admins are acting (like Nazis, ironically). As for the sockpuppetry claims, if Wikipedia banned everybody who edited a page because the subject was on Reddit or going around social media or in the news, there would be no editors left.

The important bit: Robert McClenon admits that the admins are under political pressure from the WMF board

> Can we find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are more positive about white pride? I think that trying to tone down the positiveness of the other two would not only be disruptive but would be likely to annoy the WMF Board.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:White_pride&diff=704363690&oldid=704362126

>>314950

>I don't think that this is an intentional sexual reference - far from it, I'm certain it's just due to an absence of familiarity with one particularly crass English idiom, and I have only ever known the developer who wrote the code (whose first language is not English) to be entirely proper, entirely reasonable, and the model of what a productive Core member should be.

No way you could be the problem? Nah, it has to be that guy who made something that could be interpreted in such a way it would be a problem. Coming up next:

stripstr is short for "strip sluty trannies".

The wstring type is short for "women's string" which is fetishism and objectification of women.

fgetpos is for "female get position", a reference to "back to the kitchen, women"

atof is short for "ass to face", an innuendo to the sex act and degradation of women.

isalpha is rape culture. No doubt. Rape. Culture.

These morons going in tech are the gift that keeps on giving.

>The initial file extension for files compressed with Brotli was Bro but discussion on Mozilla's bug tracking site suggested that the abbreviation "has a gender problem".

http://www.ghacks.net/2015/10/11/bro-file-extension-offensive-changed-to-br-instead/

> Some Notepad++ users pointed out several links in reddit to me, these threads were talking about some sexist jokes included as easter eggs in Notepad++

https://plus.google.com/+notepad-plus-plus/posts/WznU6qVkQbG

>Why I'm not laughing at C Plus Equality

http://blog.mollywhite.net/why-im-not-laughing-at-c-plus-equality/

etc.

>>316800

So it's not just GamerGate, this guy is in so deep he can get away with his shenanigans on any article?

>>316780

>current year

>actually wanting a joke candidate

If anyone remembers "Wikipedia tries to make the Political Correctness page Politically Correct"

https://np.red*dit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3p93f5/wikipedia_tries_to_make_the_political_correctness/?ref=search_posts

That is flaring up again at ANI. At least the page has improved since WiA noticed it, but there is still a section calling it and cultural marxism a conspiracy theory.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7377

> Community Engagement, 3 resignations in 4 days

> Monday: departure of Luis Villa, director CE, announced. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/677493

> Tuesday: Anna Koval, Manager of Wikipedia Education Program, is leaving http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/677877

> Thursday: Siko Bouterse, Director of Resources, follows: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/679170

There's some informative commentary on internal WMF politics in the thread.

GenderGappers duke it out with PC civility bros after Gamaliel approves an edgy "op-ed" by fellow arbitrator Keilana.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2016-02-17/Op-ed

Another editor got blocked for not being a Communist. Prestopotatoe had argued for the removal of text claiming that Britain is "multicultural", "diverse", and "multi-racial" on the grounds that it is a confederation of multiple nationalities.

> You guys are aware of the fact that 90% British folk can trace their ancestry back for hundreds and thousands of years? How on Earth does that make it a multi-racial, multicultural or diverse society? Despite the fact that a couple of areas in London resemble slums in Nairobi, the vast majority of Britain is uniformly white and uniformly of a single English scots irish or welsh culture. I invite you to go down to Kent or Margate and see how diverse British culture is.–[[User:Prestopotatoe|Prestopotatoe]] ([[User talk:Prestopotatoe|talk]]) 00:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Snowded called Prestopotatoe a racist and deleted his comment. GeneralizationsAreBad reported Presto to ANI, GoodDay called Presto "NOTHERE", and Jimfbleak gave Prestopotatoe a one-week block and threatened an indef. No action was taken against Snowded.

So it's now racist and a bannable offense to know that England, Scotland, and Wales exist.

If anyone remembers >>310259 NorthBySouthBaranof's fanatical scrubbing of the Huma Abedin page, Lee Stranahan has written an article which shows plainly how ridiculous North's position is.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/18/the-truth-about-huma-abedin-that-media-matters-doesnt-want-america-to-see/

More action from the crazy brigade at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Christina_Hoff_Sommers

> We are asked here to endorse an extreme political ideology in which an individual’s specious and self-serving redefinition of feminism – a redefinition that have been broadly rejected – is required to be taken at face value. Up is down, patriarchy is feminist, and we have always been at war with eastasia. As soon as Binksternet compiles the requested list of 30 or 40 reference, that list will doubtless be reverted from the article as WP:UNDUE. We all know this, and so volunteer editors are naturally reluctant to waste their time. It is clear from the sources in the article and a cursory reading of the discussion of the subject's work – and indeed from the discussion here – that most feminists disagree with the subject’s esoteric and self-serving redefinition of feminism, and the article should reflect that. MarkBernstein (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

He is refering to Sommers's equity feminism, the notion of equality between the sexes, which used to be called just "feminism." And isn't calling a BLP subject "specious" and "self-serving" a BLP vio?

> It should be clear to all the the subject dissents from many facets of the thought of Simone de Beauvoir, Gloria Steinem, bell hooks, Germaine Greer, or Judith Butler; these and related thinkers are what people in general understand to be meant by "feminism". MarkBernstein (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

> Wow! That's quite a rogues gallery that MarkBerstein has presented as typical feminists; mainly Marxists or anarchists with one democratic-socialist (Steinem) thrown in for balance. No, someone at odds with those people is not necessarily an anti-feminist. Motsebboh (talk) 03:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

And an admin weighs in:

> Scholars of Women's Studies are topic experts. Binksternet (talk) 17:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

> I would be happy with telling the reader that "feminist scholars" describe Sommers as antifeminist, absent of any attempt to assess what kind of majority. Binksternet (talk) 07:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

> You've got Patai and Koertge going against the mass of feminist scholarship. Those two don't even constitute a minority opinion against the dozens of other scholars who say Sommers is antifeminist. Binksternet (talk) 02:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

The page has been to BLPN multiple times

> This entire article reads as if it were titled "opponents of christina hoff sommers", not an actual biography … How can you say who a person is in 2 lines, and not actually show who this person is or what they do, and then go on a 2 page rant on how much they're wrong… –77.29.245.231 (talk) 02:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive52#Christina_Hoff_Sommers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive64#Christina_Hoff_Summers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive211#Christina_Hoff_Sommers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive236#Christina_Hoff_Sommers

Lila Tretikov was forced out

https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-February/082470.html

Looks like a couple of the usual POV pushers have been trying to insert their GG propaganda into the Hashtag_activism article now:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hashtag_activism

Martin Hogbin opened an Arbcom case accusing Slimvirgin, Viriditas, and Sammy1339 of POV and behavioral problems at articles on veganism. Masem and Mark Bernstein both showed up to compare the case to Gamergate, with Masem noting "how I myself was claimed by some of those involved that I was being disruptive at the talk page, simply for using the talk page for discussion regarding POV aspects" and Bernstein unironically condemning "endlessly repetitive talk page filibustering"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case

Is Bernie Sanders Jewish? Wikipedia can't tell, but they can block a Jewish editor and accuse him of antisemitism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bernie_Sanders#We_are_currently_in_violation_of_an_RfC_that_had_over_75.25_support.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sir_Joseph#Blocked

According to Gamergate fan Mark Bernstein, Christina Hoff Sommers is no longer a feminist and is a "non-notable polemicist" and should have her article deleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Christina_Hoff_Sommers&diff=prev&oldid=707629110

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Christina_Hoff_Sommers&diff=prev&oldid=707629568

>>317817

Mark Bernstein is a non-notable polemicist and should be deleted from Wikipedia.

The admins railroaded Darkfrog24 off the site, largely on the basis of questionable reports by SMcCandlish and RGloucester.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Darkfrog24#Blocked

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive188#Dicklyon_and_Darkfrog24

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive189#Darkfrog24

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive189#Darkfrog24_2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive189#Darkfrog24_3

Given how trivial the accusations against Darkfrog were, like complaining about your topic ban on your own talk page, this looks suspiciously like a targeted harassment campaign against someone with the wrong political views. I cannot say this is true, but there is a potential motive. As one of Wikipedia's most active Manual of Style editors, Darkfrog24 led a team to consider revisions to MOS:IDENTITY, the essay about using transgender pronouns that was adopted during the Bradley Manning spy scandal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons/Archive_39#Preparing_two_proposals_that_would_change_transgender_policy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Gender_identity_in_the_MoS

An IP reported the death of Lucia Black (formerly Bread Ninja), who edited on the topics of anime and video games. WP is taking it seriously. One of the rumors is that Lucia an heroed over how WP treated them.

http://wikipediasucks.boards.net/thread/103/wp-drive-editor-wo-investigating

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7428

Lucia Black had threatened suicide over Salvidrim removing one of Lucia's comments citing WP:NOTFORUM in response to Masem proposing that Wikipedians get together and make a gamer group

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASalvidrim!&type=revision&diff=699928357&oldid=699822411

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games&diff=prev&oldid=699796004

Lucia Black did have tendentious tendencies, here arguing i no need 2 rite gud:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&diff=prev&oldid=561933463

Lucia reported ChrisGualtieri to ANI five times, resulting in an interaction ban and a ban from the noticeboards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive780#Regarding_User:ChrisGualtieri.27s_edits_with_Ghost_in_the_Shell_and_refusal_to_Discuss

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive793#Regarding_User:ChrisGualtieri.27s_effort_to_make_things_personal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive794#ChrisGualtieri_doing_the_exact_same_thing_as_I_last_reported

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive806#ChrisGualtieri_and_his_method_of_attempting_to_defame_.28yet_again.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive825#ChrisGualtieri_again....28how_many_times_has_it_been.3F.29

…and broke the topic ban:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive259#Lucia_Black.27s_editing_restrictions

ChrisGualtieri retaliated:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive798#User:Lucia_Black

A sock went after LB:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive800#Proposed_topic_ban_for_Lucia_Black

More drama:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Ghost_in_the_Shell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Ghost_in_the_Shell_2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive253#Request_either_2-way_interaction_ban_or_dismis_this_1-way_interaction_ban

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive254#Request_amendment_of_Lucia_Black.27s_topic.2Finteraction_ban

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive269#Lucia_Black_Topic_Ban_Review

>>317814

>Bernie Sanders outright "names the Jew" in his SNL sketch

How is this even a question, FFS? He's not religious, but neither are most Christians, yet their religion is mentioned, too. Why is wikipedia so anti-Semitic?

>>317817

How is that guy still even allowed on wikipedia, much less taken seriously, when he blatantly and knowingly lied about the website for a Guardian article?

I guess it's for the same reason the Guardian is still considered a "reputable source".

>>318319

>Bernie Sanders outright "names the Jew" in his SNL sketch

What'd he say? "Yeah, it was me, my bad"

we cant just boycott google especially if you use chrome or chrome books or even android and many things that google owns we are owned by google..

>>318319

>How is that guy still even allowed on wikipedia, much less taken seriously, when he blatantly and knowingly lied about the website for a Guardian article?

Because he's Gamaliel's buttbuddy. That's it, really. He was banned in the past by admins with a bit more scruples (but not a lot) and his knight in shining armor bailed him out. Now he has free reign to do whatever he wants because of Wikipedia's lack of admin oversight: when one admin makes a decision most admins are too afraid to question its judgment out of fear of a boomerang desysoping.

And that piece of shit Gamaliel is now a member of this year's arbcom too, by the way.

>>311980

>Got a source for that?

Just look at the videos.

Theres loads of stare raping going on. And I even saw some manspreading.

Gamaliel has decided to add the 500/30 restriction to the "Brianna Wu" pages, not long after his buddy Mark was crying there after being accused of a conflict of interest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brianna_Wu&curid=44099481&diff=708625808&oldid=708607706

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brianna_Wu#500.2F30_restrictions

Mark Bernstein once again violating his interaction ban with DHeyward.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate_controversy&diff=710430090

I wonder if anyone will be punished over it :^)

>>319388

I guess he's been doing it all week on Wu's talk page too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brianna_Wu&diff=709963194

Wikipedia rangeblocks its own Wikipedia Zero service

https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-March/083440.html

Zoloft at WO: "So, they are finally reaching that little girl in Africa… and blocked her."

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7497

GorillaWarfare banned Cla68 for secret reasons. There is a discussion on Wikipedia Sucks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cla68&diff=709830780&oldid=709807483

http://wikipediasucks.boards.net/thread/132/cla68-thrown-bus