/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate Headquarters

>>316678 Mentioned

>there's a lot of people who hate Twitter and don't like the types of people on it.

That gave me an idea, make a thread on /pol/ and let them know there's a real chance of really hurting twitter/taking it down and making them regret the SJW trust and safety council. There's enough butthurt and desire for mayhem to convince people to make accounts and shit up trending advertising.

You just have to be careful not to make them think you're asking them to do it for gamergate or the whole thread is going to be infighting and butthurt over "gamergoys" or whatever. This can be big enough to spread to 4chan if there's little to no association with gamergate as you can always count on people hating on twitter/SJWs/brands advertising/capitalism/normalfags(not to mention lulz/the desire for chaos) as long as they're not busy hating gamergate/rs.

>>316682

Some /pol/fags are playing to be researchers right now since they discovered that sci-hub exists. Even when they are in diapers on that matter, motivating them to shitpost non-PC scientific research might get them on board.

Also, who here doesn't hate Twitter? An OP to get it all out on the light of the free fall of TWTR is the perfect goodbye to that mess.

Another hashtag that explains itself? Like #inconvenienttruth or something like that? It might motivate SJWs to use it too, and would make even more difficult banning the hashtag.

does anyone in the thread have a leddit account thats older than 3 days? KiA have some weird 3 day rule that i think is supposed to screw over sock accounts.

>>316743

sure, but a point in favour of keeping #BanMeNow other than the fact that the words "ban men" is hidden in it is that when gayy team level trolls turn the tag into normie repellent (an almost guarantee event) it wont have as much as an effect because the name tells normies ahead of time that the tag is supposed to be provocative. also theirs a risk of SJWs hijacking and changing the meaning of the tag needs to be factored in.

>>316755

I see that and expect it. I argue in favor of collateral damage by making a hashtag toxic as shit and that by the time it gets censored it silences discussion for everyone, including non-invited parties that might get in just out of curiosity.

I see we have different opinions on the matter. I'll wait to see what other leaders think about this.

>>316759

don't get me wrong if the automatic banning system is as fucked and is as indiscriminate as I expect sjws can still get caught out if they post saying "holy shit #BMN is so racist" or whatever. but the problem with that is they can still just make a new account afterwards. kinda the point of this is that when we get banned we stay banned and therefore twitter loses more money making them slide further into bankruptcy. that is long lasting accounts should be used instead of new ones (though new accounts can still come in handy for starting the fire)

its time.