No.327
What's /clang/s prefered number?
No.328
No.329
>>327
Here is the english version
3-6
No.330
I like them all as long as they're cute.
No.331
File: 1447306155635.png (Spoiler Image, 418.65 KB, 800x600, 4:3, c2e4561e34347747373f66e220….png)
5-7
There isn't even good porn of Eve.
No.337
>>331
It's like a day later but I realized I made a mistake in that sentience, I meant "There isn't enough good porn of eve".
No.347
No.352
>>329
>7
>Dangerously clank
No.353
>>329
In my opinion 7 should be Kuka robots or something like that, Eve really doesn't deserve to be that high up on the spectrum of "robot fetish"
No.354
No.355
>>353
Exactly. But perhaps this is actually just a gynoid scale.
No.356
5-7 but 4 is acceptable I guess.
I'd never say no to a scaled down MS-06
No.357
>>355
I really do think the list is just a gynoid scale, mainly because of what is listed on #6.
>Female Transformers
>Some Orbital Frames
>Fei-Yen
Those aren't normal mecha like Gundams and BattleMechs, those are very feminine mecha. Fei-Yen isn't a good mech, by the way. She's not hot at all, I'd prefer a Zaku or an Armored Core as opposed to her.
No.378
3-6.
2 is basically Human.
No.379
3-5 are great. 2 and 6 are OK too.
No.380
>all these plebs leaving out 7
No.382
File: 1448496620169.png (1.29 MB, 1353x821, 1353:821, 86a7bc1f7646135198d14ea49c….png)
Somewhere between 4 and 5
>tfw basically zero porn of Destiny's Exos
No.384
>>353
But wait, what if you had a kuka with a feminine hand at the end?
No.385
>>384
That would be some Yoshikage Kira-tier shit.
No.393
>>392
I remember that thread
No.395
No.398
>>327
1 - 3. 4 depending on the model.
No.399
>>327
>>329
As a general clang chart, this is pretty shit, but it's good as a gynoid chart which is what I think it was made as.
>>331
>massively successful movie
>has cute characters
>prime target for R34
>barely any porn of it exists
>most of the existing porn isn't even good
This legitimately puzzles me.
No.415
I am litteraly off the charts now. They don't even put sentient spaceships and tanks on here.
No.418
>>415
It's a gynoid chart, anyway which is why it's not a good chart.. Vehicles and the like don't fit onto a chart like that.
No.423
>>415
>>418
Surely that comes under 7+ being non-human and all
No.432
>>401
The first one looks kinda like she has one of those magic wand thingies as her hat.
No.437
>>398
Get the fuck out of here.
No.528
typically i wold take 5 to 7
but 4 and 3 depending on how they look
though usually i won't
1 to 2 are not even robots and should be consider filth
No.546
A big lesbian orgy with all of them.
No.549
>>399
If Wall-E was released five years later I'd say it would have gotten far more "fan-art".
No.550
>>437
Is there any porn of Johnny Five?
I'm probably going to regret asking that.
No.551
No.570
3 is the absolute lowest I'd go, but I'd prefer everything higher.
No.589
5-7.
7 especially, cute robots are the best.
No.601
>>327
5 is my favorite, but anything from 3 to 6 is pretty great.
No.603
>there are people in this thread who would go any lower than 5
No.607
>>603
If 4 was the highest available, would you say no?
No.608
No.621
>>550
I'm not going to go looking.
No.623
No.624
>>550
I checked.
There is.
None of it is worth posting.
No.661
>>337
there seems to be a mistake in your sentience indeed
my nigga you just got roasted
No.667
>>327
5/7. Not through to six, though, giant humanoids suck.
But I would totally fuck a 20-ton lightmech.
No.668
>>667
For a second I thought that picture was a Moa from Warframe.
Moas aren't 20-tons, though. They're only like three feet tall.
No.670
>>668
Just the right height
No.671
>>670
Anon no, Moas are too cute for that.
No.673
No.676
>>329
God, 5 6 and 7. When I saw EVE for the first time my dick got rock hard and I had no idea what was happening.
No.677
>>676
I'd a shame there's so little good R34 of Eve. I've only been able to find one decent image of her.