/cuckquean/ - Women Sharing Their Men

>>1931

The only problem I can see is that most impressions would appear on /v/ and /pol/. You can imagine how direct referrals from those boards would probably end up.

>>1936

I suppose. Though that could also draw in many anons eager to see the popularities of cuckoldry and cuckqueaning swapped.

What if the board ad were to say something like, "Doesn't your boyfriend deserve better?" on it?

>>1948

Boards such as /wx/ and /b/ always seem to have a bunch of people pushing the cuckold fetish and it's usually "interracial" ie so-called BBC. There is barely anyone evangelising cuckqueaning.

It makes sense when you remember that most people on this site are men and the vast majority are "beta" or consider themselves to be that way. The cuckold fetish ties into that vulnerability in the same way that trapping does I suppose. They see being a cuckold as a relevant and obtainable thing whereas having a cuckquean gf is a completely impossible concept.

Correct me if I'm wrong but most women are definitely not into cuckolding men or being dominant, but like I said it is mostly men on this site.

Anyway I try to ignore it because complaining seems to just encourage the cuckold fetishists. You can see they get off on being called degenerate.

>>1966

>There is barely anyone evangelising cuckqueaning.

That could change if more people were to think about this fetish to begin with, of course.

>>1966

We actually have an embassy of sorts over in >>>/wx/8913 but that's because we got a request long ago to cross-post WebMs we made.

>evangelising cuckqueaning

Honestly, I don't know that evangelising the fetish is a good idea. I just want more people who are actually interested in/doing it to find us here.

>>1969

Yes it does come off as spamming and can annoy people so I don't do it unless it's relevant.

>>1972

It might be that there's a strong urge present and waiting for this fetish to explode, but it just needs to have the name passed around more. There also needs to be a stronger presence of female NTR, and female NTR has to be referred to as NTR to begin with more often.

>>1975

I hope that is true. No, I believe it.

>>1972

What anime is this?

>>1978

Jitsu wa watashi wa

>>1936

Well, the ad page ( https://softserve.8ch.net/ ) says you can target specific boards. Maybe they can have it so you can exclude specific boards? Or target only certain tags, so you hit the sex and lifestyle boards only? Just spitballing; I don't know how it all works.

>>1966

>>1967

I think lots of people don't even realize that this fetish could be an enjoyable fantasy to a mentally healthy woman, much less an enjoyable lifestyle. I certainly didn't, and I'm into all kinds of other stuff. I really think y'all are at the stage where just planting the seed in people's minds is beneficial.

>>1988

>I think lots of people don't even realize that this fetish could be an enjoyable fantasy to a mentally healthy woman, much less an enjoyable lifestyle. I certainly didn't, and I'm into all kinds of other stuff. I really think y'all are at the stage where just planting the seed in people's minds is beneficial.

This.

But that seed really needs to grow up until the point where cuckold porn is rare compared to cuckquean porn instead of the opposite way around.

>20bux for 24 hours

>not based on impressions

>if 8chan goes down and your ad can't be displayed, too bad

Other questions aside, it's a pretty steep price for a less-than-fantastic system.

>>1992

Gonna have to agree with this anon. It's just too expensive for what little we get out of it. Personally I say we should just keep corrupting the poor innocent minds of other boards like /monster/ and, eventually, /pol/.

Shouldn't be too hard considering how appealing such a fetish is to most men. Just don't go shoving it down others' throats. There's no easier way to turn someone off of something than repeatedly hitting them in the head with it. Even if it is something as wonderfully delicious as 'queaning.

>>1997

/pol/ is extremely vulnerable. We agree on many things like male and white superiority. OK so not every /pol/ack is an aryan superman but it's nice for them to imagine they are and hear about women being submissive for once. All they see is horrid crazy feminists.

It's been discussed before but maybe /pol/acks could be made to accept some race mixing too. If they are still producing lots of white children with their white wives then what is the harm of having a few asian and black girls as well?

I'm sure we all have different views in regards to white supremacy and racism etc and take it seriously to different levels. Personally speaking, I am just a funposter, but I am willing to pretend to be a total nazi if that is what it takes to trick /pol/ into going full /cuckquean/.

>>2004

/pol/ack here. I'll chime in here.

>All they see is horrid crazy feminists

Not really. /pol/ has seen more threads about women in support of white nationalism and all. But hey, if there was ever a time to tell them to build a white harem, its now. Get them while they're hot!

>I say we keep corrupting the poor minds of /monster/

I was under the impression that you already had /monster/ on a leash.

>/pol/acks could be made to accept some racemixing too.

Taking a bit of a stretch there, aren't you? /pol/ is pretty damn set against racemixing of any kind. Oh well, if you do manage that one I'll eat my shoe. Scout's honour!

All in all though, I'm surprised that /pol/ doesn't have this fetish more. It was made for them.

>>2009

>I was under the impression that you already had /monster/ on a leash.

For the most part we do; however it's good to keep targeting them as they're a vector for other boards like /tg/ and /furry/ Even if furry is gay as hell and have an uneasy relationship with monster

Also this fetish was actually discussed on /pol/ in a small thread but the discussion didn't last too long due to a kneejerk reaction. Simply put all they saw was the word "cuck" in the title and the majority of the /pol/acks ended up seeing red as they all thought it was a thread pushing for cuckoldry and not cuckqueaning. The thread devolved into nothingness before being slid/nuked by mods(Not sure which happened all I know is that it 404'ed pretty fast.)

Ontop of this many /pol/acks see having harems, or anything outside of the traditional one man one woman relationship, as degenerate and would tarnish a good conservative society. I for one am not one those that believe that but that much is obvious considering where I'm posting right now.

All in all /pol/ WOULD absolutely love this fetish if they knew more about it. The biggest problem comes from their absolute hatred of the male cuckold fetish and the word cuck in general makes them instantly think of the fetish they hate the most. If we want to get /pol/ we need to introduce this fetish without using the word cuck and once they get used to it and start to love it then we give them the proper name. The redpill of cuckqueaning is a tough pill to swallow but in the end they would be all the better for it.

>>2010

>But the discussion didn't last too long due to a kneejerk reaction.

I had remembered this around five minutes after I made the post. I can't really blame them for it, but on the other hand they could at least pay attention and read the full post before they let the word "cuck" send them into an /r9k/ inspired rage. As I said, /pol/'s quality in anons has taken a steep drop recently.

>/pol/acks see having harems, or anything outside of the traditional one man one woman relationship, as degenerate

That's just /pol/ being /pol/. I'm a bit of a traditionalist myself, but current times should have more /pol/acks open to multiple partners. They could have the white baby factory they dream of to fend off JIDF shills. Too bad they take just about everything to the hilltops of extremism and never come down. I personally have no problem with it but I can'f say the same for the majority of the board.

>/pol/ WOULD absolutley love this fetish if they more about it

I agree. And it's a shame, but /pol/ is stubborn and almost never changes its mind. I don't blame them for associating cuckqueaning with the other side of the coin, but I wish they'd just calm down for a second and listen to what you have to offer.

I wish you luck in jewing /pol/ into cuckqueaning though. Should be fun to watch on my end at the very least.

>post yfw cuckquean saves the white race

Also, would the /cuckquean/ pill come with two seperate capsules or what?

>>2012

Aww! Don't worry anon, I'll add you to my harem! How do you feel about having lots of pretty half-white babies?

>>2012

C'mon Anon, you know what /pol/ is like.

>One drop rule

They'll probably use the same mindset with you being the harem's designated voyeur. However little sense it would make.

Although… I'm not a living caricature like the majority of /pol/ so I'd be more than glad to have you. Just pls no baby boys. I don't want to raise the supreme gentlemen v.2.

>>2010

>For the most part we do

No you don't. You just have a few people on the board that occasionally enjoy this fetish while the rest of the anons stay away from it.

I didn't say I am asian no did I say I am a girl. This is just a hypothetical. I just want any visiting /pol/acks to have an open mind.

>>2013

Some asian girls are slightly obsessed with blue and green eyes and blonde and red hair as well as pale skin and freckles so they might prefer to see all the white girls become mothers.

>>2014

>Just pls no baby boys

This sounds incredibly awful but honestly I agree. To be fair though I have seen plenty of hafus that look handsome / pretty but is it worth the risk?

>>2016

>Is it worth the risk?

Oh god no. Not at all. Eurasian males are born fucked over. They usually grow up rejecting/resenting their white half and get extremely jealous when they see their white dad getting intimate with their mom. Its like being cucked fo them. Not to mention how they feel less masculine than others from their asian half. Just find any hapa community online and you can see what I mean. Feels like you're watching an entire group's descent to madness.

Seriously, life as a halfie is suffering, at least the girls can fit into some degree of normality.

>>2017

I am feeling the urge to start posting karen gifs for some reason.

>>2016

>not asian

Dammit, my white imperialist cock demands minorities for the harem.

>>2023

One of the reasons why I mentioned the racemixing thing is because I think white men should actively show off their superiority. Having slaves / concubines from all over the world seems like a good way to do it. Really glad to see someone agreeing.

>>2029

Honestly, I don't get all that worked up about racial politics.

I just have fucked up fetishes.

>>2042

Yeah, I just wanna watch my boyfriend fuck. No reason to turn it into some goddamn movement.

>>2042

List them all.

>>2045

Don't come crying to me when the feminist storm troopers smash down your door and drag you off to the forced labour dreidel factories.

>>2052

>List them all

Domination, bondage, ice, wax, degradation, slapping, spanking, spitting, choking, white-dominance raceplay, petplay, living furniture, cuckqueaning, and assorted corruption/authority figure roleplay scenarios.

How's that, anon?

>>2055

Apart from spitting (eww), petplay (too silly) & living furniture (also too silly) in an ideal world all of those things would be standard.

>white-dominance

That is a fact not a fetish.

How do we convince all white men to sort themselves out and take what is rightfully theirs? There's not enough white women for that to work but that is why other races exist. If monster girls or robot girls become a thing then I suppose that is another source to fill the white man's harems. Though that is just wishful thinking until those lazy scientists get off their arse.

>>2057

another /pol/ack here.

I'm open to sex with shitskins, east asians etc, but is it ever worth the risk of impregnating one? Guess abortion is an option - I'm generally anti-abortion when it comes to whites, but not in other cases.

I actually prefer watching porn with jewish/asian/north african actresses, because I don't give a fuck if they destroy their lives by appearing in it.

As long as the male performer is uncut, because I can't identify with kikes, arabs or christcucks.

>>2125

>>2057

We have a thread for this over at >>153

>>1972

>How are you guys so powerful?

I know in modern western societies it has become difficult to discern but Homo sapiens had always been a quasi-polygynous species.

Sorry if too /pol/.

>>2453

When we revert to r-type behavior of course>>2453

>>2703

But what conditions and stimuli prompt this conversio.n/reversion? Is it environmental, or a cycle of social denial and acceptence?

>>1997

>>2009

Hi, /pol/lack here. Someone mentioned /cuckquean/ last night, and holy shit this is an amazing fetish. I just accidentally brought up cucking microsoft with linux over Cortana being a bitch and someone turned that into Cortana being a cuckquean.

>>2704

Ironically lack of resources favours K-strategy.

White people aren't less fertile because they had it easier but because they had it harder. Is just that today's relative abundance of medicine and resources favours r-strategists.

>>2770

But Gentoo have no games…

>>2774

Foreplay and teasing is overrated.

>>2774

It does with Vine.

/pol/ here, degenerate it may be I don't see it as much of a problem as actual cuckolding. I wouldn't even consider this actual cuckolding either. In an ideal society this will never happen, but it could be a good transitional into pure monogamy.