/cuckquean/ - Women Sharing Their Men

>>2884

What gives you the impression that we're nice or kind?

As for finding a cuckquean, there's a thread at >>650 about increasing your chances. Basically: Don't look directly for a cuckquean.

>>2884

>>2886

Oops, I meant that there's a thread on it at >>645.

>>2884

>Are cuckgirls really as nice and kind as they seem on this board?

We have no choice. We are omega bitches by our nature.

>I want to find a cuckquean girlfriend

We are a fringe fetish board in a fringe imageboard. Good luck with finding one IRL.

>>2886

>What gives you the impression that we're nice or kind?

My guess simply by not being borderline misandric closet-feminists and largely complete cunts like /fem/.

Guess Swami and tumblr did us a great favor. I was like the most insecure and almost self-loathing girl in my school and the internet made me feel like a princess by comparison and largely for virtues that I perceived as vices before.

>>2888

>We are omega bitches by our nature.

Hot.

>We are a fringe fetish board in a fringe imageboard. Good luck with finding one IRL.

In my experience, being a dominant alpha male makes it much more likely to find them or even help people discover that fetish, like the other thread on this board says.

>>2892

Threesomes and foursomes with Chad Thundercock are way more easy than actual cuckqueaning (that requires a devoted and meaningful relationship).

>hot

Agreed. These trips were hotter than an auswich oven.

>>2889

>largely for virtues that I perceived as vices before.

This has me curious. What sort of things do you mean?

>>2893

If Chad actually wants a devoted and meaningful relationship (while fucking other girls) then yes, it's easy.

>Auswich oven

/pol/ helped me discover a fetish for girls who talk like this.

>>2887

I checked it out, thanks.

Like >>2889 I said, compared to /fem/ you are just so peaceful.

>>2893

Threesomes are fun but it's the meaningful relationship part that makes the board worth visiting for me every now and then, it's like the girls here actually care about their boyfriends.

>>2922

No. I'm surprised I missed it. I wasn't so much in queaning back then too.

Is it possible to turn a loyal girlfriend who is disgusted at infidelity into a cuckquean?

>>2938

Short answer: Probably not, unless she secretly harbours the fetish already. There's no way to "make" a cuckquean. (There are a few threads up on this already.)

That said, what we do isn't completely the common definition of infidelity. Also depends on whether she's more or less disgusted by infidelity depending on circumstances and on whether it's done by a man or a woman.

Your own motivations also count for a lot. The question indicates they're probably selfish. That's not a great basis to start from.

>>2939

They're about either man or woman.

You could say anything is selfish, I mean I want her to enjoy it, lol.

How did you develop it?

I /pretend/ed with a guy and we actually developed feelings for each other, when i told him him i was male he kelpt wanting to pretend. I still like him and keep him in contacts. The last i heard of him, he was celebrating holiday sex with his new gf. The idea of him enjoying himself with a female body is fulfilling, does this count as cuckquean since it's autogenophilia? tfw no female body

Also you should make a 'QTDDTOT - Questions that don't deserve their own' thread. Although maybe the board isn't big enough.

>>2884

no

Can a yandere possibly be developed into a cuckquean without resulting in murder suicide?

>>2985

Only if she were the kind of yandere to threaten and blackmail other girls into submitting to their man to make up for any slight wrong they might have done him.

>>2986

I don't think she is, and testing that might be fatal

>>2959

A QTDDTOT thread might be good. Some threads get created over and over because there are a few common questions new visitors seem to ask.

I ended up fucking y younger, cuter sub in front of my wife and we … got divorced later and my sub lives with me.

Tread with cautious pleasure my friend 8]

Most women have it in them. It's just covered up with shame and denial. They aren't honest with themselves.

I blame feminism. Because of that, everyone seems to think of it as abuse. We have this nonsense culture of male dominance = bad. Meanwhile, 'queans couldn't see it more as a good thing if they tried. They want to be submissive like women are and they want men to be dominant like they are.

It's common knowledge that men are more attractive when they're taken and their women find them more attractive when other women want them. That should tell you everything you need to know.

>>3169

Everything you say is correct for cuckqueans, but asserting that

>Most women have it in them.

is wishful thinking at best and a grave error at worst. Most women were not cuckqueans in pre-feminist society, just as most are not cuckqueans now. Exercise of male dominance does not automatically include the right of multiple partners, just as female submission does not automatically include enjoying one's dominant counterpart taking partners other than oneself. Note that prohibitions of adultery in ancient societies covered both sexes, for example.

That said,

>everyone seems to think of it as abuse

is sadly correct. It can be abuse, just as anything can be abuse if done without consent. But that has little to do with feminism's rise and more to do with most people being unable to understand this particular kind of dynamic. Again, note that pre-feminist societies still sanctioned adulterous husbands.