/eris/ - Discordia

I don't know either. I'm honestly surprised there's been so little overlap between discordianism and *chan culture to date.

>>108
Same. V for Vendetta, a relatively obscure comic book, blew up, why not Discordianism?

>>118
discordianism is entry level for most people, all occultists end up going through a distancing and then a final relapse into hardcore occultism. I assume people who were once interested in chaos will become interested in shit like yoga five years down the line and do that seriously.

I've already had my relapse, and my entry point was /x/ shite, which I dont bother with at all anymore.

>>306
The "hardcore occultists" are schmucks.

They've forgotten a duality that's been ignored forever, that needs to be brough up as often and as well as possible; Humor v. Seriousness.

>>313
I just meant someone who is actually interested in it

>>108
the overlap is and always has been there, its just not appearant because discordianism is particularly difficult to explain to people.

for instance, shii. shii is a faggot who wrote the text board system that was used on 4ch before they got rid of them and was an early admin there. he also wrote several articles on anonymity, image boards and many other things.
…he also has an account at PD.com and had a pretty major part in some wikipedo arguments concerning discordianism's wiki page.

uh, what else?
/pol/ and /x/'s "greenpill" meme character carries around a copy of Prometheus rising…which is one of RAW's books.

and then there's just general user base: I'm a discordian, have been since 2003? and got into Chan culture in 2008 or so. I'm sure there's many more like me (shit, go ask a religion question anywhere on 4 or 8…guaranteed you'll have that one faggot who screams about hail eris or fnord).

Perhaps we could make some promotional materials?

>>332
we literally need google Page rank. I mean srsly: this is one of the few discordian image boards that exists, yet google doesn't even list us under "discordian image board".

I'd say google bombing could be more useful than " promotional materials"

>>334
How do we into "Google bombing?" The algorithms changed recently, I think.

>>335
well, not actual google bombing as it was made famous, but link + keyword…uh, spamming, to be blunt.

search engines still work on the principal of grep for the keywords among indexed pages + rank based on in-links with similar keywords.