/gamergatehq/ - HULKAMANIA is running WILD!

>>315461

>With your new account, you should AVOID following the following accounts:

>@Grummz

>@Nero

>@CHSommers

The blockbot doesn't work. I've made my account last June, immediately followed these 3 and a bunch of other GG accounts. Spammed tags during highjacks, used the GG tag, etc. and I'm still not on the blockbot.

I'm following ~1500 open GG supporter that tweet in the tag and retweet others on a regular basis. Many of them openly stated that they are on the blockbot. Still not blocked. Looks to me that Methwahle rather added them manually during the first few months by monitoring the hashtag.

Individual lists that are shared by these ideologues are a much bigger threat than Methwales blockbot. Even then, those lists are usually only used by people that are already too far gone anyway, so who cares if they can read your tweets or not?

>>315461

If still worried about Blockbot bullshit then Based Baldwin should be on the list too. He was one of the main accounts as well

>>315642

So you guys are basically saying the block bot no longer uses Harper's guilt-by-association algorithm?

I remember they had an issue when they started using this pile of crap, the list would overflow when blocking accounts with too many followers.

I've read on their website any subscriber of a block list can still add new entries to that list by simply blocking as usual. So I take it's manual only now?

https://about.twitter.com/safety/council

Anita's group femfreq is part of a twitter anti harassment group,which means 2016 will be a year of a fuckton of banned pro gg twatter accounts.

Thread lightly y'all

fg

>>315699

>hey guys lets turn Twitter into a social justice hug box

>that will bring everyone back

>omg Trump won NH and he hates political correctness

>I see no problem in my plan other than Trump is a shit lord :^)

This is what they actually believe. I bet they didn't even do any sort of opinion polling or anything to see why people stop being active on twitter. They're probably just assuming it's what the SJWs are telling them it is, because they're self proclaimed "experts".

Sometimes i wonder if twitter wants to drive their stock prices to rock bottom then have their shareholders sell out completely then some moneybags buys a fuckton shares at the cheap to gain majority control.

>>315693

Twitter is already in its fucking death throes

Doing this would put the nail in the coffin.

>>315699

>No Crash Override Network

Lmao

>>315724

What if we all pitched in and bought Twitter

>>315730

Had a look at few people involved in this, those I checked run with the narrative of "women and girls are primarily victim of everything, everywhere". Yes, even for associations that focus on child abuse/trafficking are more eager to communicate of female victims and male ones.

Dangerous Speech Project twitter feed hilarious, it's full blown SJW with gems such as "Mass shootings every day and they're not done by terrorists or Muslims", and "White Americans are the biggest terror threat in the United States".

I wonder what their involvement with Twitter is exactly. If they want to specify guidelines, they'll have to be pretty broad and unclear, because they will eventually overlap over each other's fee-fees (that is, unless they just do the minimal work)

>>315741

>female victims than male ones.

Shit I'm high.

>>315784

Somebody to tweet her facts?

http://womenactionmedia.org/cms/assets/uploads/2015/05/wam-twitter-abuse-report.pdf

See how "reasonable" these people are?

Twitter is officially kill

https://archive.is/saBjC

anita is joining lol

you guys need to get on GNU social

use the freezespeach node or something

>>315977

I hopped over a few days after the weird Quitter migration that ended in most of us banned for shitposting, and some guy spamming Quitter with CP in the public timeline.

ps lo-ping and that tranny or whatever that always argues with ralph are being faggots at each other on twitter

>>316144

They are both full time twitter shitposters only difference is one is bearable the other is completely unsalvagable,the fact that they think its a worthwhile endeavor to argue about whatever insignifant nonsense rather than ignore each other speaks volumes.

I have yet to make an account yet on the sealion club will do so soon and post results here,As for twatter not much to do its horribly boring and the people on the are mostly brain damaged retards with too much free time on their hands.

I think they shadowbanned Milo & Mercedes they never show up in my timelines they used to now they don't anymore any word on that?

>>316232

Looking at it, it's talking about incitement to violence, or at least trying to lump shitposting in with that. A Don saying "Take care of that guy" is obviously dangerous, an Islamist preacher encouraging jihad is obviously dangerous. Nero saying feminism is cancer is obviously not dangerous but they're going to try to abstract out and make that link based on fringe components rather than the central question of whether or not it's an actual call to violence.

These people are often twisting a good idea. Listen and Believe is supposed to mean, if a woman says someone assaulted her, call the cops and help her keep her shit together until they arrive and collect the rapidly decaying evidence. Safe Spaces are supposed to be psychiatric clean rooms to discuss heavy shit in an unstimulating environment where variables are controlled. These people are parasites trashing useful tools and fucking shit up for the sake of a power grab.

>>316380

>"Abuse team" abusing their powers

It's like poetry.

Mark Kern is testing Twitter's censorship algorithm. A tweet about srhbutts was removed from his watchers' timelines.

https://twitter.com/TrojanHorse711/status/699306114639220736 https://archive.is/tZs2y

Stay awhile and listen,

A good way to beat this council is to have everyone report every single tweet they disagree with. Force the rules for an "appropriate tweet" or whatever to be clearly stated.

Bonus points for reporting with socialy justicey buzzwords. Make investigations hard to undertake and numerous as hell. This will have the effect of making the system worthless.

This requires activism above hashtag spam. Spread the word (but I would advise not spreading it on twitter so you can avoid being banned for a call to action).

I don't know if anyone still reads this board, so pls discuss.

>>316430

Where else could we spread this if not on twitter?tumblr,4chan,reddit?those places have their own problems to deal with

I recommend just using burner accounts to spread info about Twitter's shenanigans

>>315977

Seems like a good alternative. Not everyone is on there for the same subject as i see, so this could prevent an echo-chamber scenario. Good find Leader.

>>316585

Did Based Gamer even get off? I tried to use it but I haven't seen any reviews there.

>>316590

Me neither. Cloudflare brings up an old version and it's currently down, but tweets from Jennie says that it's live as of yesterday. Can't be a DDoS because of CloudFlare…

>>316634

That explains alot.

Did anyone find out out why mercedescerra was shaowbanned from twitter?

>>316646

http://archive.is/ArdfY

This?

>>316239

Good. Also remember that hashtags like #fuckparis still exists.

Hello, been a while since the last time I was here. I ceased my twitter activity a couple months ago, since I had to take a break from all the faggotry.

I decided to start with a new account considering some of the points of OP. Is #OpSkyNet still a working thing?

I'm wary of shilling my account there because that's preciscely how my former account got so quickly filled with trolls and weak ass accounts who became burnouts and neutrals shortly after, and I really don't feel like repeating that.

Also is there any lsit of well known GG people that I can follow with little or no risks of joining an automated blocklist?

>>316808

Basically you can follow anyone except our major e-celebs like Milo, Kern, and Based Mom. #OPSkyNet does still function, just announce that you're new/returning.

Remember to stick mostly to the tag for tweeting and FARTing pro #GG stuff. Every good voice improves the signal to noise ratio, and the tag traffic will improve as more people contribute.

>>316852

So we got account revocation, suspension and prompt to remove tweets, shadow ban, the block bot… you have now more ways to get kicked out than interact with others.

At this point they'll have to create bots, or inflate the numbers in some ways in they want to reassure the investors that the user growth is back on track. Next month might be interesting (Visa may decide to sell their shares in Square, another company owned by Jack Dorsey).

>>316852

Archives of the tweets.

http://archive.is/wBX4X

http://archive.is/TRfoz

Who is currently wasting money on Twitter? It would be very problematic if the investors knew how Twitter is shrinking their userbase even now that they are losing numbers.

Also, just found this gem:

www.profitconfidential.com/stock/twitter-stock-this-fresh-idea-could-send-twitter-inc-soaring/

http://archive.is/IXEWy

>Twitter’s chief has found a way to make this live user engagement more intuitive. In the latest quarterly call, Dorsey said, “Hearing about and watching a live event unfold is the fastest way to understand the power of Twitter.”

>Pay attention to the keyword here—that is “watching.” Humans are inherently visual. We like photos, videos, and infographics more than wordy text. This is especially true for the live news industry, where content moves fast.

>Dorsey wants to make good use of this power. Yes, your Twitter feed will now look more dynamic and visual than ever. Only last month, Twitter integrated Periscope into its platform, which was just the beginning. With Periscope, users can share and stream live videos on their Twitter accounts. In other words, Twitter users now have access to live broadcast.

>Following that, Twitter has rolled out a new feature on its platform today that will allow users to express themselves through dynamic images or GIFs. (Source: “Twitter Just Made GIF Usage Much Easier,” Yahoo! Finance, January 18, 2016.)

"Stay here pal, nothing's happening pal, don't read those ugly numbers, you'll get confused and your head will go duh-duh."

The article seems like written for retards, but it might be part of the kind of mindset they want from investors. Sites like these survive putting paid reports showing favorable futures for the ones that pay them. A good focus point would be to show how Twitter keeps censoring and blocking communication, effectively discouraging users from using the platform. In this case, the advances on communication are useless when the company keeps silencing one part of their userbase. This might also explain why the company keeps going on the crush course.

Another one:

http://www.valuewalk.com/2016/02/twitter-executives-buy-companys-stock-to-boost-confidence/

http://archive.is/7Nwtn

>Much-needed morale boost for Twitter

>Noto bought stock worth $250,000, while Kordestani bought 122,250 shares worth around $2 million. Kordestani, a longtime Googler, was named Chairman of Twitter’s board in October. The micro-blogging firm actually needs a morale boost of this kind. The company’s stock is already down 22% this year, and in 2015, it plummeted 62%.

>In the past as well, Twitter executives have bought shares to boost Wall Street’s confidence in the company. In August 2015, when Dorsey was serving as Twitter’s interim CEO, he made a small financial showing of support then.

>Twitter did not comment about the purchases, nor did the two buyers tweet anything about it. However, it is clear that they want to give a message to the company’s employees that things will surely turn around.

>Concerned investors and Wall Street

>Investors are concerned about whether or not the company will ever succeed in attracting a wider audience beyond the loyal core user base it has. These concerns deepened even further after the company announced that in the fourth quarter, it did not add a single new user.

>Twitter went public in 2013, and since then, it has gone through several ups and downs, such as the hiring of a new CEO, laying off employees and losing several top crucial executives. Though the company has introduced new features and has been at the center of many a news cycle, it has not been able to shake off much of the doom and gloom around it until now.

This reminds me a little of those times sending emails to advertisers of certain pages. Why not do something similar on every investment page talking about twitter by telling investors how much of a bad choice sticking with TWTR would be?

>>316867

Twitter is fucked up in more ways than one with all those things yet no one says anything.

Gee i wonder why…..oh yeah

Its because the twitter userbase are mostly too busy maturbating over the tweets of their favorite e-celeb or shitposting themselves stupid to notice that shit going on

Since twitter is going to fall, why not promote better platforms like GNU Social? I swear the sites runs smoother than twitter and any faggot can make their own GNU Social site if they install gentoo.

>>316942

>>316942

It needs to be good on mobile, otherwise normal people won't use it.

>>316990

Somehow this makes it worse.

Is he trying to look coy?

All he needs is a fedora and he's all set

This is just a rumor but an interesting one:

> Theory going around that Twitter is replacing ad revenue with grants to develop social control techniques.

https://twitter.com/JustusRanvier/status/701093580480372736

>>316867

I forgot to add "auto filtering" to the list (this thread, "The twitter endgame is here, it looks like twitter is actively filtering your mentions", is from may 6th 2015)

https://archive.is/SPaPl

>>317022

>develop social control techniques.

Very interesting… but if this Twitter's "social control techniques" in action, whoever issued those grants should ask for their money back.

>>317121

Nah, it's just Josh, his entire existence is discomfort and sadness.

So here's what I don't get:

If the Powers That Be at Twitter are trying to suppress conservative voices, why are they picking people like Milo, Adam Baldwin, and Sad Puppies authors? Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and Michelle Malkin are all still verified and tweeting conservative thoughts during an election year. Even Alex Jones still seems to have the Twitter Seal of Quality.

Or if those people are too popular to silence, then why haven't we heard anything about conservative talk radio hosts around the country getting silenced on Twitter? They're regionally important media figures and it's an election year. Twitter could even cherry pick a few to try and influence a primary, but there's nothing!

What's so special about a blogger, a B-list actor, and a SF author that makes them targets while Twitter totally ignores seemingly more strategic targets?

>>317265

>What's so special about a blogger, a B-list actor, and a SF author that makes them targets

They are special because they are not cuckservatives. They openly attack socjus and aren't super rich, which makes them fair game for the crooked ultra-left establishment.

>>317271

>"cuckservatives"

Nice try.

>>317280

Try to do what? Most right-wing politicians and pundits are still subservient to their communist masters.

>>317280

>Words with "cuck" suffix attached

>>316852

>>316867

Related:

https://twitter.com/maramala/status/700131029944705024

Summary: @maramala tweeted about @mannypaquiao, then noticed that they no longer follow the disgraced Filipino boxer politician.

As an aside, the proGG in that tweet thread, @AntisocialJW, was just suspended as I post this.

>>316852

>>316867

Related example:

https://twitter.com/maramala/status/700131029944705024

Summary: @maramala tweeted about @mannypaquiao, then noticed that they no longer follow the disgraced Filipino boxer politician (Manny Pacquiao recently made the public comment "gays are worse than animals" and got attacked by SJWs for it).

As an aside, the proGG in that tweet thread, @AntisocialJW, was just suspended as I post this.

>>317271

When you say "cuckservatives" you mean neocons that work for bankers and Israel instead of America's interests right? Because a lot of people throw the word "cuck" around now almost as much as feminists throw the word"rape" around.

>>317394

I always just assumed the term referred to the type of politician who'd claim to be conservative to their constituents during an election, but when faced with direct leftist opposition they'd immediately acquiesce, handing over whatever they demanded while just sitting back there and watching them ravish their alleged principles.

>>317401

Yeah, that's a good definition.

The only conservative value a cuckservative holds is fighting against gun bans. That seems to be the one issue that almost all repubs actually put their money where their mouth is.

>>317423

I'm going to create a new word and call it cockiberal and see if it caches on

Wow, what the fuck. I just read the wikipedia article on Gamergate after not being involved for a while and it's sickening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_controversy

Completely cucked.

Normies waking up

> Codes of Conduct as Trojan horses for psy^hbad actors to infiltrate communities and knock out the leadership:

https://twitter.com/hintjens/status/700010469860491264

>>317444

can you link to a better gamergate article? the spanish wikipedia gamergate article is a direct translation from the english wikipedia article, replacing the article with a less biased one would be nice.

Here >>317494 i see some minor opportunity to start the fires and talk about censorship of wrongthink. It can be worth the try just getting angry about the general state of the media with contents and opinions and how that destroys freedom of speech.

Despite what i think of Doug, seems like a good movement.

>>317450

I heard the Portuguese one is awrite

So, if people are actively Tweeting conservative opinions, but Twitter isn't shadowbanning them, is that proof that they're secretly SJW Illuminati supporters?

>>317551

>implying conservatives that isn't popular will be targeted

Look, it's not strictly your views that'll get you on the hit list, it's how much influence you have. What most of the shadowbanned and suspended accounts have in common, besides being critical of Twitter, is that they have big follower counts, usually 5 figures if not more.

If getting shadowbanned was because of strickly conservative opinions, Twitter would be a barren wasteland by last week already.

I suggest downloading a third-party app (not on your PC, an add-on for twitter) that can measure "influencers" such as Klout. It'll help gauge who are the popular accounts to follow/stalk/target/whatever.

It won't update instantly, but I've also noticed that shadowbanned users usually have their Klout score drop sharply by 10 points or more, so that could be a way to detect Twitter Support shenanigans.

I can't believe that Gamers are Dead has snowballed to Hilary guaranteed losing the election.

Nice job, SJWs.

>>317574

Speaking of Hillary, pro-Sanders people are getting censored now

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/social/whichhillary-tag-goes-viral-twitter

>>317566

Wait, so is it big follower counts that get you banned, or small ones? Conservatives with a lot of followers like Alex Jones are fringy enough that Twitter could probably get away with shadowbanning him, but he keeps posting stuff all the time. And it sounds like there are plenty of local AM radio hosts with 5 and low 6 figure follower counts, so why isn't Twitter shadowbanning them? They can't all be SJW Illuminati.

>>317576

>implying they aren't shadowbanned already

Also, there was an attempt by some Twitter users to figure out when and what triggers the shadowban script, and the only thing they noted was the inconsistency. For instance Mercedes was shadowbanned, then the ban lifted while she was asking her followers to check if she was shadowbanned.

If it turns out the prominent users weren't shadowbanned by a bot but manually by a twitter intern… well, now we know where all that twitter money is flushed to.

Can someone with a twatter please tell milo the daily beast is literally owned by the Clintons via its parent company, huge press ethics issue for the election.

LOL I thought I understood this issue, but I guess it's too complicated for me.

I'll check back in a month and see if it makes sense then.

>>317677

Why Can't Twitter Kill Its Bots?

http://archive.is/oLpTj

>A cynic might think the $23 billion company doesn't want to address bots too rigorously because they make the social network’s user base look more robust.

>According to Twitter’s own estimate in a 2014 SEC filing, about 5% of accounts—or the equivalent of roughly 13 million of them—were bots or fakes. Estimates by outsiders have been higher, and Twitter would have an incentive to downplay the number, says Emilio Ferrara, a computer scientist at the University of Southern California, who studies bot culture.

Twitters Says Over 13 Million Accounts May Be Bots And Fakes

http://archive.is/yTiVT

>While some researchers have placed the number of fraudulent or spam Twitter accounts at around 20 million, Twitter's Q2 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission estimates the number closer to 13.5 million users, or under 5 percent of its 271 million users.

Soon she will know the power of a million tiny yellow penises.

That autist subjectzero has been posting FIRE RAPP REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE,NINTENDO,SJ LITES FIRE RAPP REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE PEDO APOLOGIST all day today.

Keep in mind he was the guy spamming gore with goose and friends and is part of the revoltpack.

I have no idea what he hopes to accomplish by spamming a # all day long like the basement dwelling permaneet that he is.

>>317891

pretty sure he's just joking.

>>317891

With twitter it's easy to take shit out of context perhaps he was just joking around maybe it was bait to rile up the twitterfags.

All we can do is watch him and see how he reacts to know if he is on the up and up

>>317896

>>317958

That's the thing. He tried to stay out of this and repeated he wanted to remain neutral. And now he's stepping in, even if it's a joke or a trolling attempt, he's in.

PedoButts is already taking a piss at his tweet, and I wouldn't be surprised to see others going ape shit about it. His issue he had with blue whale and the other "gimme bucks, I'm trans you shitlord" are probably going to resurface.

I genuinely have no idea what he's getting at.

But yeah, that's his problem I guess.

Potential fuckery: is Twitter taking away people's followers?

https://twitter.com/GamerGateFTW/status/705590696451948546

>>318074

Twitter has proudly announced that they pretty much integrated the (dis)functionalities of the blockbot. Since the blockbot does force unfollow people who are subscribing to X or Y block list, maybe their in-house version of that system makes everyone automatically a subscriber of such list, subscribing them every now and then?

Just a thought, I have no idea nor element to back that up. But my pinky says it's not a bug.

>>318170

>>317880

This fat fuck was full sjw. I wonder if his usefulness ran out.

If he actually gives a shit about GG he needs to be public about it. Back GG related projects at conventions so they don't get shit down. Otherwise he's just a lonely retard with no friends who latches onto whoever will give him attention

Its pretty funny what happened to Lauren Soutehrn.

>>318351

She insulted the white race, and called all nationalists basement dwellers. She is no better than the enemies we are fighting.

>>318367

whoops meant for >>318364

>>318367

Care to share where this aforementioned statement took place?

>>318374

I think she's shitposting by making fun of /pol/'s Nazi Larping but then again doesn't everyone?

>>318381

We are venturing deep into /pol/ territory here i don't really know all those terms

>>318383

I'm saying she's implying that she thinks that blacks and muslims can be considered ethnically European, which is a farce.

>>318386

>>318381

>>318374

All she do is to say that "White Genocide" thing is retarded. What it really is

Unless you are white supremacist and racist, using term "white genocide" when talking about anti white and retarded anti racism actions and words from leftist and minorities is shooting yourself in foot.

Whatever truth behind facts you show to support that claim you just exaggerating it and fear monger no better than Rape Culture, and you only make yourself look bad in eyes of normies and other neutrals. And point/goal should be to eliminate leftist extremist influence and make majority into opposition toward them, unless you want your extremist to be on top.

#HulkvsGawk guys. post Gawker factoids or Hogan wrestling.

>>318386

You got all that from a 140 character sentence?

Cause i sure didn't it looks like she's mocking /pol/ hardliner gas the jews race war now types.

>>318404

Then what do we called it? Something is happening in 1st world countries against our will to promote more "diversity" and its hurting alot of people. Merkel has thrown Europe into chaos and she might be overthrown for what has happened.

>>318445

Except by UN Article 2 on genocide means "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part."

So yes, while genocide is a "scary" word, its accurate to describe it. We are set to become a minority group in our own countries in a decade, and that is a fact.

Look, I disagree with what /pol/ says for the most part. I'm actually very socialist, but I'm a race realist and I'm against a deliberate systematic change just because of what happened in the last decade with two world wars and an arms race.

I can understand being scared of that term, but any free speech advocate should educate themselves even with things they disagree with. People need to expose themselves to different things, and that's one thing Ms Southern doesn't want to do.

>>318447

>Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

And this is not describe thing what people call white genocide.

> We are set to become a minority group in our own countries in a decade, and that is a fact.

There are other factors to that, what can't be fixed by going against immigration completely. Stopping imigration or any other idiotic leftist actions may not change that too.

>I can understand being scared of that term, but any free speech advocate should educate themselves even with things they disagree with. People need to expose themselves to different things, and that's one thing Ms Southern doesn't want to do.

Free speech is not excuse for misinterpreting or twisting word for sake of suporting your argument and agenda if not fear monger in general.

This video is what I'm talking about. It's pure white supremacy propaganda playing on fear and other feels. This is no better than what leftist propagandist do, same thing what lead and support white guilt or beta male white knights even today.

I agree and understand that guy from middle of video, but presense of rest of vid and it's format make his words sound worse.

Without stuff like white genocide trown more people can agree on some issues at least.

I prefer not let leftist and bigoted minorities redefine racism as something what white people can't be victims and still call out their bigotry.

>>318453

Its a systematic change in the demographics, against our will. If not white genocide, what would you call it?

Antifas want less white people and they threw piss in Southern's face. If anything its satisfying knowing that cuckservatives and marxists are eating each other apart, both are a liability to Making America Great Again!

>>318447

I can see the motivation and intention in increasing racial tensions like it's happening right now (there are groups actively promoting racism and discrimination against white, while also conditioning everyone to believe they are victims, this is abnormal, especially from a government presumably there to ensure peace).

But using genocide? That's a stretch. Like you said:

>deliberately inflicting

>calculated to

Prove there's an intention behind their actions, and prove that these actions deliberately will conduct to the extinction of whites. And I'm not talking about the useful idiots doing (or endorsing) something "for the greater good" without realizing the consequences.

>>318570

This is the intention, watch for yourself.

One, this is the mean, not the intention. The intention is where you want to go, not how you want to go. I can see many ways by which a population may be reduced, but it's not a proof in and of itself that it is the intended effect.

Two, the translation is misleading. Inbreeding implies sexual intercourse. In this context, "métissage" should be understood as "multiculturalisme" – having people from different backgrounds sharing the same place (that's why he then goes on and lists "in business, in administrations, in education, in the political parties", not "in families").

Three, bonus point for the scary music.

Get me an intention.

>>318582

Exactly. White genocide is a not a real thing.

The real problem is that White women are increasingly making themselves unfit to be mothers of White children. The only women who are suitable mothers are Asian. The only perpetrators of "White genocide" are White people, but it's out of ignorance, not malice.

>>318582

You are deliberately beating around the bush, there has been a systemic change in European demographics. Politicans have openly admitted that they want people to race mix, Sarkozy just fucking said if people don't they will use measures to force people to do so.

People who criticize the immigration crisis have been thrown in prison and their children put up for adoption. Europe is an an Orwellian goverment control.

The media also has been promoting it too., they wish death upon and they want us gone. Sometimes it makes really both sad and angry, it wasn't just Germany's Adolf Hitler of vid related. You know who also saw what was happening? General George S Patton and he was murdered because he wanted the German people to be treated fairly! Don't you see!

What's happening in Europe isn't a coincidence! Its our death sentence!

>>318618

But the fact that it's not happening through intent, but out of ignorance means that there's nothing to be done about it.

Might as well enjoy the end of Whiteness.

>>318618

Okay, we got a few means and the supposed objective (because those are not inherently tied to reduce the amount of white, you can achieve this objective by other means).

I told you: I do not put in question that something is happening, I do not question that politicians are going for a multiracial society.

>I can see many ways by which a population may be reduced, but it's not a proof in and of itself that it is the intended effect.

I'm questioning whether or not the effect is intentional, if the foreseen diminution of whites is the reason why they do it.

An hypothetical event: if you are feeling miserable and someone tells you "you look wonderful today", you know what they just said, and you know how you react to that sentence, but you have no idea if your reaction was what they intended to obtain. They might be trying to cheer you up, they might be trying to poke fun at you, or they may be totally oblivious to how you feel and were trying to be polite.

I'm looking for that intend, especially since you provided this definition for genocide:

>Except by UN Article 2 on genocide means "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part."

And I want the "deliberately" and "calculated" part to be unveiled.

If you know the intention, you don't have to waste your time fighting each attempt at reaching a specific goal, and instead work on the reason why they want to get there and see if it's possible to change that. Having an unclear definition of the intention leads to see more enemies than there is, because anything that could in some ways contribute to achieving that presumed intent will be seen as an attack, even if there's none.

Put very bluntly (I guess no one will be that obvious, except maybe feminists), I'm looking for a document that says "we want to reduce the number of white because…" (you provided reasons why, so just focus on the "want to reduce the number of white").

>>318626

Should have ended with a TL;DR

Do I agree that white demographic is slowly melting? Yes.

Do I see a possible interest as why should you reduce this demographic? Yes.

Do I agree to the term "genocide"? No. Because I have no proof it's intentional.

>>318637

I never said you were some paranoid freak or never claimed you were wrong. I said it's the only thing I need to believe you, I take you don't have that piece either.

>>317682

5% only? Facebook had 10% before they went into the stockmarket. After the big sellout they deleated a lot.

>>318620

>>318626

Let me ask you this, do you agree that some powerful elites have been trying to promote race mxing and less white culture?

Look at the song "Blanda upp" in sweden, which basically said women should try getting BBC, it showed a qt3.14 Swedish girl getting banged by a nigger while singing the National Anthem.

In a way that's more relevant to GamerGate, game journalists have been demeaning us and saying all gamers are racist and sexist whites. They want less strait white characters, more gay characters or colored.

We already know about the Anti-white Oscars and the SJW Hugo Awards. One of them caused a backlash, meanwhile we haven't been very effective against the Jews in Hollywood.

>>318840

>do you agree that some powerful elites have been trying to promote race mxing and less white culture?

Less white culture, yes. Race mixing, no (but culture mixing, yes – unless you provide me instances of actual interracial banging)

Don't think for an instant that I agree with the destruction of white culture and the increase in racial tensions in general. The point of divergence you're going to face again and again (that include with myself) is the use of the word "genocide". Because it's hard for me to determine whether it's trying to bring "the physical destruction of whites", or if it's about raising every non-white up. It's also hard for me to find whether you're facing a useful idiot unable to see they are shoving bodies in an oven (in which case they are puppets, not initiators) or if you're facing someone who knows what he's doing.

Destroying a culture, as despicable as it is, isn't "physical destruction". Bringing every except X up isn't equal to bringing X down (or else, you also have to accept the premise that "every time a man achieves in his field, all women are brought down by default").

I'll give you a margin: if you are talking about Sweden specifically, and how they change the rules of "positive discrimination" whenever it benefit the people they don't like (white AND male), then "yes" I wouldn't pretend they don't know what they are doing (they are discriminating against anyone who's white AND male under under false pretences). And yet I don't consider that to be "white genocide", because white AND female is still A-okay for the VIP list.

>>318840

Sorry I'm a scatterbrain lately.

I want the intention of the initiators and not the actions of some puppets for the same reason I do not consider two thousand isolated people lashing on you as harassment; if there's an organization, if there's an actual synchronization and concertation for the attack, then it's planned and it becomes obvious that the effect is intentional. But the actions of these two thousand isolated people doesn't prove that it's is orchestrated and deliberate.

>>318858

>>318860

So you only see it as white culture being erased? You know: food, tradition, events, values, etc.? You disagree that "people" are being erased from existence? There is evidence everywhere other than anecdotes.

Here are some examples: Star Wars Force Awakens romance, Super girl's love interest race reversal in the "Super Girl tv series", Barry Allens love interest race is changed in The Flash tv show. Jessica Jones has alot of race mixing between a white woman and a black man. Hollywood has been pushing this hard, and there is many more examples.

then there is video related.

>>318924

Methinks thou dost protest too much.

Somebody got jungle fever.

https://twitter.com/ArisenBleu/status/709039618495221760

https://twitter.com/ArisenBleu/status/709041206731411457

Smells like tag jacking time

>>318937

>>318925

you're dodging it on purpose aren't you? That's okay, enjoy the cultural enrichment and a nigger fucking your white children. ;^)

>>318985

>Come on dude! All I'm asking is a double standard!

>>318985

Sounds good. You too.

Someone remind me what Nackt's done for GG, aside from whine about Revolt's boogeymen?

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1soem9l

The lady doth protest too much, methinks

>>319109

>>319109

He quit digging a long time ago like most of the diggers with identities,he belongs to twitter now.

Reminds me of cameralady who quit altogether after the whole chirodev incident,

>>319208

> Part of the divide was keeping Gamergate as a purely anon attack

And that divide always had an obvious solution. Anons stay anon, non-anons become trusted (or untrusted) information hubs and public representatives. You do your own thing, everybody is happy.

>>319246

>Last i saw of him he was sperging out that brad's survey didn't fit in with what he thought the results should be.

1) Nackt didn't sperg, he pointed out that a survey that ignored just about all of the contributions of the chan boards and IRC front (and yes they contribute in their own ways) were being ignored in favor of Reddit and twitter, which while more measurable have their own ideological biases towards power posting users and make overtly skew more to the MSM left than it actually is. Brad did what most twitter only communicating people do which is try to initiate a silly twitter argument over the whole thing instead of doing what Nackt and most sane folks would do which is using twit longer to make a a more succinct point. A smart well written critique is not, I repeat not a

2) Twitter, the chans, Reddit, IRC are basically tools that's all they are. Only users that obsess over the tools rather than using them such as yourself and >>319208 and >>319246 need to get that rotten projection booth of yours fixed. Meanwhile this anon gets this very basic principle : >>319243 . And the whole lot of you could learn something or two from the Karen Straughans of the world see the following vid attached. This kinda goes double for the jkelly's of the world to boot (but for different reasons), there's a lot of us who have no loyality to any board or platform we just us it as a communications tool, no more no less.

>>319285

>>319291

Hi Nackt

>>319285

>>319291

How sad is it that you have to white knight for yourself, Nackt?

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1soeuka

Hey, here's a thought - go suck on Thidran's cock a bit more. Maybe put on a wig and pretend to be his sister, I hear he really gets off on that.

>>319323

I don't think that's Nackt talking, nor is that his writing style. And are you justifying narcissistic behavior as a good thing?

>>319336

>And are you justifying narcissistic behavior as a good thing?

Please show the class where I said anything about "narcissistic behavior", I'll wait.

>>319337

Well for one, you're defending that Cult of Vivan, an MSM plant was an ally. That's one defense of narcissistic behavior. Also that fact that some anon was pointing out narcissistic traits and you've become defensive about tells me that you don't like anybody calling out these behaviors, period.

>>319346

>Well for one, you're defending that Cult of Vivan, an MSM plant was an ally.

Please show me where I was defending CultOfVivian. I'll wait.

>Also that fact that some anon was pointing out narcissistic traits and you've become defensive about tells me that you don't like anybody calling out these behaviors, period.

Please show me where I became "defensive". I'll wait.

Then again, I'm not expecting much in the way of good faith from an obvious Revolt shill. Surprise me.

>>319347

>Revolt shill

So that's your response? Calling out names? Here's the deal, provide analysis (I.e. something more than a single sentence) to prove it.

And you still didn't answer my questions with nothing more than an ad hominem of "I'll wait" if that's even a response. Look why is it that an anon calling Acid Man a narcissist is upsetting to just you ID #9ae6d and no one else in the thread? What do you get with calling an anon poster as some projected version of a named person on Twitter to back shit up?

I think your board mod can take care of himself and he doesn't need you to white knight him.

>>319373

>Lets see here shilling for ralphretort

That's not what he said squid princess, he said the following:

When things started hitting the fan was when people were targeted for not talking like the HQ crowd, not liking the same ecelebs (You even censored Ralph's links and others) and pretty much forced your own brand of ideological purity down other people's throats instead of letting them debate and make up their own minds what was right and the end result was not what you desired. It turned into a censored KiA style hugbox.

That was neither a rejection nor an endorsement just an observation. Not sure why a board user like yourself would obsess over Ralph anyways.

>>319364

>So that's your response? Calling out names?

Seemed to work just fine for you when you implied I was narcissistic.

>And you still didn't answer my questions with nothing more than an ad hominem of "I'll wait" if that's even a response

kek asking you to back up your statements is an "ad hominem"? You still haven't provided proof for what I asked by the way, maybe you should get on that :^)

> set aside your differences and work together with your allies.

So much this. Most of what we disagree with each other on is such trivial nitpicking that we should be able to agree to disagree on it and move forward.

>>319880

Just like GamerGate supporters tried to get a Nintendo employee fired ;^)

>>319884

I'll take things that didn't for $300, Alex.

>>319884

>Treehouse

>Localization

>PR rep child porn apologist

b8 harder.