Agfa APX100 found in a bulk loader at a goodwill store. It smells like old people so I assume it's old and poorly stored.Shot it at ISO 25.Developed in D76 1+3 for 18 minutes at 20 degrees C.<tinyboard flag alt>Denmark</

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1423517458456.jpg (238.25 KB, 678x1001, 678:1001, cqfkhu.jpg)

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:30:58 No.312

Agfa APX100 found in a bulk loader at a goodwill store. It smells like old people so I assume it's old and poorly stored.
Shot it at ISO 25.
Developed in D76 1+3 for 18 minutes at 20 degrees C.

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:32:48 No.313

File: 1423517568155.jpg (224.74 KB, 1001x681, 1001:681, Scan-150209-0005.jpg)

Can't blame the film for shaky hands and missed focus.

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:33:39 No.314

File: 1423517619327.jpg (209.73 KB, 1001x664, 1001:664, Scan-150209-0011.jpg)

I don't know...

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:35:10 No.315

File: 1423517710530.jpg (274.49 KB, 1001x672, 143:96, Scan-150209-0012.jpg)

Shooting at ISO 25 is fun in it's own way, though. It forces you to either open the lens up a lot or use a tripod.
I have some old film rated at ISO 6 I should do something with some day.

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:36:30 No.316

File: 1423517790498.jpg (239.83 KB, 659x1001, 659:1001, Scan-150209-0022.jpg)

Missed this by a second. She was really enjoying that sunshine all closed-eyed and whatnot, but I was late for it.

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:38:03 No.317

File: 1423517883679.jpg (303.75 KB, 655x1001, 655:1001, Scan-150209-0023.jpg)

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:39:02 No.318

File: 1423517942195.jpg (246.21 KB, 1001x662, 1001:662, Scan-150209-0028.jpg)

I usually shoot one or two of these on each roll. They're popular on tumblr but I don't think it's very good, and certainly not original.

Anonymous 02/09/15 (Mon) 21:40:49 No.319

File: 1423518049035.jpg (227.16 KB, 674x1001, 674:1001, Scan-150209-0029.jpg)

f/4 does this no favours. If it were a decent shot I'd go back with a tripod and stop down.

By the way, there's no 8ch/p/ channel on IRC, but you're all very welcome in #/p/ on rizon.net.
Strictly speaking it's a 4chan channel but it's not like moot drops by and weeds out the dissenters daily.

Anonymous 02/10/15 (Tue) 18:49:18 No.320

>>319

In my opinion F4 is not a problem and certainly not worse than any F > F4. Instead, I'd blame framing.

>>312

I like the exposure of this one, you nailed it. I love the highlight-shadows composition of it.

>>313

Not really notable photo but the way how pidgeons are blurred looks very interesting.

>>318

You now better about what is posted on tumblr. I bet that you are right saying that there is nothing original in this "style" but I still like the tonality of it.

Anonymous 02/15/15 (Sun) 11:38:37 No.323

>>320
Thanks for taking the time c&c.
I agree with it all but it's still nice to see it from someone other than one self.