/32/ - Psychopolitics

>>1577

Perhaps you can find something of this nature among the non-indexed boards, or in sociology and psychology forums (which won't be chans).

>>1577

Most of the other boards with similar quality are even slower, unfortunately.

You're probably best off contributing quality content to the board, I'm willing to bet there are far more lurkers then contributors here.

Polite sage for not psychopolitics.

Thanks for the information. I don't know enough to create my own threads. I have posted on other threads but I also see almost no new posts on other threads at all

It's unfortunate

Mods delete please

>>1582

There's no need to delete the thread. Other posters may yet know of similar boards.

The issue is that psychopolitics lies at the intersection of media studies, marketing, psychology, sociology, and conspiracy theory... among other things. Perhaps you should seek out boards for each of these fields.

>>1581

Honestly I wonder if what a Chan with strong moderation would be like

Sure a lot of people like to shitpost there is a point where shitposting goes off the scale and it drives people away

>>1619

Like /32/ only more active because of their less niche nature, presumably.

I made /white/, which is supposed to be psychopolitics and propaganda when it's on topic, but it's shitposting when it's not.

I don't like to ban, hence the shitposting.

There's the forum on psywar.org, which also appears to be high-quality but is very very dead.

>>1779

It seems to be mostly for collectors of propaganda leaflets, right?

Still worth a shot.

How about /pol/? They had threads of pedowood and other such propaganda, etc.

I want to revive this board because It does a damn good job at spreading the truth and educating readers beyond the propaganda they've been fed, or as /pol/ calls it, "redpilling".

Come to think of it, this is essentially an apolitical /pol/, with better posts in lieu of shitposting, anime, and nazi paraphernalia. Our entire purpose is essentially what /pol/ would call "redpilling", without any mentions of race, nor Judaism.

Then again, since we're obscure, that could explain why we haven't gone to shit. Better to die in the shadows than to become a putrid, shambling abomination in public.

>>1868

I view /pol/ but I dislike how much shit posting there is

>>1868

>They had

Yup, between the First and Second major Exodus(Exodii?) there were so many great moments. People were a lot nicer and much more constructive. We were building things back up again. I remember, beaverposting, pedowood and the massive, "The Cabals Explained" thread. I didn't save much from it unfortunately. People understood so much better how psychopathy works.

>>1868

>revive this board

We've never been this lively to begin with. Think of it as being on life support.

>>1876

What are you theories as to why the quality dropped so much and so fast?

I think it had to do with the large influx of people during the Second Exodus (that was because m00t nuked 4/pol/, right?), which only stopped using 4/pol/ because it was unusable as a platform for "political" (and I'm using the term as generally as possible here) discussion. The fact that they stayed even after it was obvious that the platform was being censored shows that they either chose not to believe in the evidence (which shows naïveté) or that they didn't care as long as it didn't involve jews and they had a large enough audience for their shitposting.

Also, do you have any of those beaverposts saved? They could make for good discussion here, depending on the topic.

>>1924

not working for me

>>1924

>>1925

Nevermind, it just saves to desktop for some reason

>>>/bmw/ for development of political memes & trying them out in the field. Practical Politics & memetic warfare.