/32/ - Psychopolitics

ok

I suggest we make fake Tumblr accounts and try to sick Trannies, blacks, Jews, Feminists and other Leftists on each other. They barely have anything in common, and it would be fun to watch their little squabbles turn into a full on flame war.

>>172
I think giving the enemy the impression that we are defeated is exactly what we need to do right now. As the enemy gives their back to our apparent corpse they will be at their most vulnerable.
Action must only be taken to counter an offensive at an invaluable target.

Also, provoking a government agency doesn't seem like a good idea.

>>192
Can you develop a bit on that plan?

>>194
>>192
Trannies and feminists would be the easiest ones to pit against each other, I think. Plug in some rhetoric about how trannies dont know the struggle of real women and are just pretenders, etc. Sub-groups like that already exist, just a matter of adding some lighter fluid.

So we know it can be done, sure, but what would this accomplish in the greater scheme pertaining to free speech an securing anonymity?

>>195
Leftists are the biggest opponents of Free Speech. If we divide the Left, then we can conquer them.

>>196
We should only devour pawns to get closer to the King, not for the sheer sake of it.

There really should be a more direct and general message about what these "Leftists" stand for, plant those seeds in their communities (flavored to their tastes) so they begin to questions themselves and regain their self-determination.

>>197
Furthermore, one of the biggest pillar of the "Leftist" movement is feminism, so they should be the first target and then that effect will trickle down into the sub0groups. We send agents to blend in their communities and arouse discussion in a sensible manner, and then plant those seeds, linking articles, etc.

Coming from an angle they're familiar with is too important, uniformity is what they crave, but if we project the appearance of uniformity and plant those seeds which are well researched and irrefutable. There's room for lots of breakthroughs.

>>198
>project the appearance of uniformity and platning seeds

One strategy we could work from is by establishing proxy blogs and figureheads for locals to flock around and listen to. It's unrealistic to expect them having the clout of say Anita Sarkeesian, but it can at least project the image of something bigger and better than the status quo. Popular "sensible" feminists can also be contacted and allied with, there's one whose name I forget, but she's posted often.

>>199
Redpill them without them realizing they're being redpilled. Point out their hypocrisy while veiling to be having a non-threatening discussion. Have them latch onto these new/fake figureheads who are really our shills. The Left does this kind of thing to us all the time, why can't we do it to them?

The main thing we need to do, is have them destroy each other if they do not come to their senses. It's a bonus to push them to the Right, but either way they won't be a problem for us anymore; whether they be destroyed, fragmented, or turned over to the Right.

>>200
>Redpill them without them realizing they're being redpilled. Point out their hypocrisy while veiling to be having a non-threatening discussion. Have them latch onto these new/fake figureheads who are really our shills.

Precisely. I think if we press the message hard enough then those communities would dissolve and transform on their own in accordance to the new memes, if we merely focus on their destruction then that's all that we'll get, with nothing to replace it with (God forbid something even worse comes along).

So what I suppose this hinges on then is us at /32/ developing a manifesto of sorts, to keep the vision plain and written in stone so we never go outside of our scope and/or become susceptible to sabotage.

I have done some more thinking on this subject in the last few days and I think I have come to a conclusion on how we should strike. The sjw movement is not inherently a pro censorship movement. At least not in the eyes of the rank and file. The sjws have been unwittingly recruited by the Puppetmaster into furthering their agenda. If we want to stop their momentum and deal some damage back to the leader we need to drive a wedge between the concepts of social justice and censorship. As i mentioned in another thread an individual's understanding of a word is dictated by the associations that that person makes upon hearing or reading the word. This is likely how the Puppetmaster turned them against us in the first place, by linking the two concepts. Our goal must therefore be to change this association.

I propose we do this by linking the appealing and the obscene. If we were to pose as sjws pushing a pro censorship agenda, while simultaneously promoting an agenda they find abhorrent such as jihadist Islam or fascism, they would reject us as well as "our" pro censorship agenda. In theory this should significantly weaken them giving our fellow /pol/acs a better footing in their fight. Best case scenario: they actually turn on the operatives who recruited them in the first place

>>202
This isn't a priority, but down the road after we've softened them up a bit, can we some how convince them that it *might* not be a bad thing to oppose white-genocide?

Obviously this is not a topic that should be brought up right away, but down the road could this be a possibility? If not, it's fine.

The main example I've used (which actually worked on my sociology professor) is to say "Well, what if a bunch of whites moved into the Amazon and took over an Indian's village?" Obviously, SJW's don't like the thought of whites ethnically/culturally cleansing/displacing other races, so it might open their eyes to how it's not good the other way around either.

>>203
Meh, this is what I'm saying about establishing guidelines to remain within a certain scope. This board was made with the idea of securing free speech and anonymity on the internet, nothing else.

>>204
Got it. Just thought I'd throw that out there.

>>195

How about we stage a false flag, get someone to pose as a tranny, someone to pose as a feminist, and we have a flame war publically on tumblr and promote it widely using shell accounts and linking the feud to feminist and tranny groups with argument baiting comments.

Your targets should be PR firms like Burston-Marsteller who make their money from altering public perception and discourse