/32/ - Psychopolitics

The jews use this all the time. Promise everything, give back nothing, BUT ALWAYS blame it on the other guy. This goes with that old proverb about two wolves fighting one another, and the one that wins is the one that you feed. The jews have managed to use Pavlov's methodology to manipulate one side without actually feeding it, merely setting up psychological cues (triggers) that make them think a reward/punishment is coming.

Furthermore the jews infiltrate a society through the mechanisms that connect one generation from the next. Note old retards are harder to sway to a new paradigm than young/unfiltered ones. They always use the younger generations by creating the means to intentionally and covertly stupefy them while yet again offering them a solution to their problems through marxist ideology.

>>2485

>Are all movements that gather and unite masses of poor, uneducated, often stupid "Have Nots" and set them to work against existing power structures / healthy, strong, rich, intelligent segments of society.

So they unite the stupid and unpleasant peasant masses against the rightful strong, healthy, rich, beautiful, intelligent, sensitive and moral few?

>Socialism (poor, uneducated), Christianity (meek, sick, lost, helpless), Political Correctness/mass immigration ("minorities"), University campus SJW (poor kids with little power that are easy to confuse/brainwash), Feminism (weaker sex), Black Lives Matter (uneducated/poor), Rules for Radicals book (attached), etc

They're all subjects which are sown by intellectualism first of all. They aren't mass movements as much as they're fields of the popular intelligentsia. Foremost they are about their idea of social change, which maybe they've been successful at implementing. After that they are possibly tools to attack as you say. Black Lives Matter is transparently an astroturfed black grievance group that's used to harass targets of George Soros and to help furnish the stage of minorities vs whites. Femen is an astroturfed feminist grievance group used to "harass" (show tits) targets; allegedly of Soros and to furnish the stage of women against tradition. The socialists have Noam "who knows, who cares" Chomsky, the slobbering Zizek and parties like Syzria leading them on.

Really good thread.

>>2485

>And none of these movements are active in Israel.

This. It is this discovery, at uni (and only regarding one group, feminists) that made me dig deeper and realize the immense hypocritical game that is played on Europe and her cultural (and many times genetical) descendentants.

>>2485

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_True_Believer

This applies here as well as the Trolls/SJW thread.

As to your point that Jews often play a role in at least the initial phase of intellectual criticism: consider that Judaism is a special case of ethno-religious preservation by contrarianism. The culture is singularly obsessed with preservation of itself. The history of constant oppression is now held sacred and reinforcing this objective. Absolutely true we can say much of this opression is due to the inflexible nature of their culture. But this is what has preserved them in some form or another for thousands of years despite a seemingly handicapped strategy of discouraging conversion and small population.

With all of this contrarianism so ingrained in Jews, combined with the tradition of scholarly development, it's no wonder we see Jews making intellectual critiques of any goy society.

And why do we see so little interest in such critique of society within Israel? Because they are within a Jewish state. Such rebellion would only likely come from the most miserable or socially removed Jews.