This thread was deleted from /pol/.Ask yourself why.

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1417992570497-0.png (253.46 KB, 1346x634, 673:317, 1.png)

File: 1417992570497-1.png (247.62 KB, 1071x638, 1071:638, 2.png)

File: 1417992570497-2.png (114.18 KB, 1046x635, 1046:635, 3.png)

Anonymous 12/07/14 (Sun) 22:49:31 No.469

This thread was deleted from /pol/.
Ask yourself why.

Anonymous 12/07/14 (Sun) 22:50:09 No.470

File: 1417992609377-0.png (136.86 KB, 1055x636, 1055:636, 4.png)

File: 1417992609377-1.png (197.3 KB, 1057x637, 151:91, 5.png)

File: 1417992609377-2.png (177.59 KB, 1150x638, 575:319, 6.png)

>>469

Anonymous 12/07/14 (Sun) 22:57:54 No.471

File: 1417993071990-0.png (449.3 KB, 1355x635, 271:127, 7.png)

File: 1417993071990-1.png (215.1 KB, 1345x635, 269:127, 8.png)

File: 1417993071990-2.png (247.42 KB, 1338x636, 223:106, 9.png)

>>470

Anonymous 12/07/14 (Sun) 23:28:07 No.472

File: 1417994887731-0.png (107.4 KB, 1066x636, 533:318, 10.png)

File: 1417994887731-1.png (58.23 KB, 1330x637, 190:91, 11.png)

File: 1417994887731-2.png (220.01 KB, 1330x638, 665:319, 12.png)

>>471

Anonymous 12/07/14 (Sun) 23:34:20 No.473

File: 1417995260091-0.png (140.23 KB, 1194x637, 1194:637, 13.png)

File: 1417995260091-1.png (35.73 KB, 1288x637, 184:91, 14.png)

File: 1417995260091-2.png (138.17 KB, 958x517, 958:517, 15.png)

>>472

Anonymous 12/08/14 (Mon) 01:49:24 No.474

That's why I never liked /pol/. That and many other reasons.

>Everyone calls one another "shill"
So much paranoia. I'm sure they are pushing that word to prevent us from having fruiful discussions….

Anonymous 12/08/14 (Mon) 01:54:24 No.475

RAIDEN TURN OFF YOUR SYSTEM RIGHT NOW

Anonymous 12/08/14 (Mon) 02:05:15 No.476

It should be quite obvious that the men in the dark room are not members of a single ethnic group, or nationality, or political affiliation, or any religion we know of. The true masters of the world are united only by their goals and their methods, all else is irrelevant.

A rejection of this realization stems from a fear of the destruction of the comfortable black-and-white perception of the world. By admitting that maybe things aren't as simple as they seem, one must admit that he doesn't know, that he isn't in charge, that perhaps he is still being lied to. Humans very much enjoy believing that they know everything they need to know, and will defend this belief with fearsome fanaticism.

Also interesting to see this board being mentioned in increasing frequency.

And don't worry about this thread being deleted by the mod.

Anonymous 12/08/14 (Mon) 04:14:19 No.483

Hello, /32/, I was in that thread. I'm the anon who posted the Dugin image and who then made the introductory resources just before the thread was deleted. I made a follow up thread that got a little bit of attention but was slid into oblivion.

>>>/pol/478032

Anonymous 12/09/14 (Tue) 02:58:48 No.487

>>476
Brilliant. Blaming the jews, marxists, illuminati, etc is people grasping for some simple enemy or narrative understanding. Once you start going down this rabbit hole it can be dizzying and you crave concrete truth. Having a simple scapegoat is comforting. If there really is a group of people pulling the strings you can be damn sure most of us probably don't know anything about them. I don't think i'm smarter than them. they are winning for a reason, all we can do is search and keep our eyes open.

Anonymous 12/09/14 (Tue) 20:25:12 No.523

>>487
Accept that blaming the jews actually makes some sense. They might not have a secret plan, but they are a minority living of the majority and feel no loyalties outside their own group. most minorities are going feel discriminated against and will lash back at that. jews promoting multiculturalism fits well with that theory

Anonymous 12/10/14 (Wed) 11:59:43 No.549

>>487
We obviously can not know the true nature of our enemies, however a clear picture has at least been painted of their goals, and it doesn't help to confuse and distract our goals of combatting it.

I'll be specific:
Our enemy has the common goal of global power by total control of human- and non-human resource. We know that.

We also know that Marxism is a method to install single party populist rule and place control over resources under the power of the party.

It is clear that our enemy seeks global statism. It doesn't help us to say we can not know anything about them.

Anonymous 12/11/14 (Thu) 04:44:18 No.556

File: 1418273057479.jpg (247.67 KB, 500x593, 500:593, manhatten1.jpg)

>>549

This is close but a bit off the mark, global statism is globalism, and it is not strictly marxist.

One thing to note is that Mao had very clear links to Yale, as did the Bolsheviks. The past hundred years has seen a whole range of centrally controlled experiments in social control, and Marxism has been shown to not be the preferred mechanism.

Populist authoritarian liberalism is the most successful system of control yet devised, however it is crucial to not that mainstream liberalism is not particularly left wing at all, and is certainly not very Marxists. It has more in common with Hayak and Keynes than Marx. Remember, Keynes actually proposed a system pretty similar to a universal basic income.

Traditional statism is a unidimensional view of the what is being brought into being though. In the globalist world, nation states are replaced by corporate states, with workers being denizens of those corporations. Of course meta entities like corporations and states don't actually need humans to exist, and their perfect final form doesn't actually require humans at all. It is a system built around the fetishisation of control, not control of humans, but control of the universe around us.

The ultimate end state is a self replicating collective intelligence virus, spreading through the universe, consuming energy and turning matter into sentience. Humans are just a stepping stone on that road, and we are approaching the end of our usefulness.

Anonymous 12/14/14 (Sun) 00:18:08 No.581

>>556
>The ultimate end state is a self replicating collective intelligence virus, spreading through the universe, consuming energy and turning matter into sentience. Humans are just a stepping stone on that road, and we are approaching the end of our usefulness.

You just outlined the most basic goal of the so called 'Great Work' - to consume the universe and redesign it's raw materials in accord with the will of the gnosis itself. Reminds me of the gray goo scenario.

Anonymous 12/15/14 (Mon) 02:45:52 No.591

>>556
>It has more in common with Hayak and Keynes than Marx.

What exactly do Hayek and Keynes have in common? I'll admit I've only read Hayek but they don't seem to agree on anything. Are you saying their adversarial debating was just for show?

Anonymous 12/15/14 (Mon) 08:27:11 No.592

There's a weird thing where the Jew is made really obvious but then you aren't allowed to talk about it in the MSM

Some places on the internet are different and almost the opposite.

Personally I think it gets hard to ignore the frequency of the surnames but I think they are almost like a scapegoat. I don;t think you can ignore the other ethnicities that allowed them to come to power or work with them (general urban elite)

If they were exterminated/removed (realisticly so unlikely, people are just not down for it) there would be other groups lining and fighting to be the "new jew"

It's a privileged role

Anonymous 12/24/14 (Wed) 16:03:18 No.620

/pollack/ here.. I made a thread about MK ultra the other day and it got a ton of hits and didn't get deleted. The problem is your thread was lame and didn't offer any positive information about MK.

Anonymous 12/24/14 (Wed) 18:35:16 No.621

>>620
>didn't offer any positive information about MK.

Well, yeah. It wasn't meant to be a thread about MK Ultra. It was about questioning power structures.

Anonymous 12/26/14 (Fri) 14:18:39 No.640

>>591
One of the key techniques in controlling public discourse is to frame the debate. for the past eight decades, almost all western economic debate has existed in the thin space between Hayek and Keynes.

Their disagreement is not that there should be markets, or that governments should oversee markets, merely a disagree about the extent and techniques of government involvement. Keynes takes the approach that economic policy leversm such as interest rate adjustments and government debtm can alter society in predictable mechanical manner. Hayek takes the view that markets are more organic, and those policy levers will fail, resulting in long term boom and bust cycles beyond the control of governments. In essence, it is a discussion about the level of state authoritarian control their should be over markets. In a way it is the foundation for the petty disagreements between neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism.

Those are the ideologies we find ourselves at the mercy of, not the products of Marx or Engels.