No.222
is there an infographic like this for web browsers?
No.232
Chrom*: best one, people who claim "botnet" are to stupid to look in "advanced settings" and turn things off.
Firefox: decent, but has problems with memory and overall slightly worse than chrom*.
Everything else: garbage
No.234
>>232HUEHUEHUEHU
>implying turning off "complete rape of privacy" in settings actually does anything for the evil that is googleuse a firefox fork, and never look back.
No.235
>>232https://8chan.co/tech/res/13421.html#13421the shills have been running around 8chan like crazy telling everyone "yea yea google chrome sucks but mehhhh firefox is even WORSE!!!!!! hueheuh!!!"
don't listen to them.
mods should start banning these liars, I sense them, they come from the other chan.
No.252
>>234What about Comodo Dragon?
No.254
All browsers are shit.
Just pick one and go with it.
No.255
Firefox is way better than Chrome… if we're talking Firefox 24 that is! Firefox 30+ is kill. When 24 is kill I'm moving to Seamonkey.
Pic related: GO FAST GO FAST GO GO GO GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
No.256
No.257
No.539
Is uTorrent 2.2.1 still not the gold standard? Been using that bitch forever. Also, is r(u)torrent supported at like Blackcats, and the like (I'd check but shits down).
No.552
>>5392.2.1 is the way to go. Still running that motherfucker since my grandma was in diapers my nigga
No.573
No.589
I want to remove utorrent but I'm seeding some torrents there, any easy way to move them to one of the alternatives?
No.592
>>589>copypasted from /arse/After you install your new torrent client, look for the Add Torrent option. You'll have to navigate to the folder that your trackers are stored in, but that shouldn't be a problem. If you don't know where the trackers are stored, go into your current torrent client, and look under the Directories tab in options. For instance, in uTorrent 2.2.1, Click Option>Preferences>Directories and then check under "Location of .torrents". It should tell you where the trackers are stored. By default they're stored in a Windows Temp folder IIRC. Personally, I store my trackers in a custom location, in a folder in my Downloads folders. This is not necessary, but I do it just so I know where they are. This is just a matter of borderline autistic preference on my part.
Now just remember, upon uninstalling or removing your torrents from your old client, do not tell the old client to remove the .torrents. It will delete the trackers and you won't be able to seed in your new client without replacing the trackers.
No.620
Vuze
>has a large wiki with some very informative pages
>open source
>supports ip filters, ignore rules
>also has optional/forced interface bindings which are easy to use but effective and MANDATORY if youre using a vpn
Say the vpn goes down but your internet connection is still up. Normally your client would still send data but with bindings it wont
No.770
>>222Frostwire is the best browser. Firefox sold their souls a while back
Sent from my iPod
No.792
>Chrome: Fast and convenient if you have android, but botnet regardless
>Firefox: slow and SJW
>Waterfox: fast and forks before firefox was shit
>Pale moon+other firefox forks: good for linux, not as good as waterfox
>Chromium: probably the best if you take the time to build your own version
No.798
>>222is that utorrent shit true?
>fucking nzb pleb that just started using it No.807
>>792How do you actually build your own version of Chromium? I spent an hour clicking around their website yesterday and I still have no idea how the fuck you actually install and run the browser.
I'm not a luddite or anything, I just don't know what the fuck I'm supposed to do.
No.813
>>807I second this, I had a normalfag macbook user friend figure this shit out while I'm still in the dark.
No.818
No.849
>>235Mozilla shill pls go
No.1064
>>232>are to stupidYou're clearly qualified to make that assesment. Enjoy your shitty browser, playskool interface and delicious spyware.
No.1073
What about deluge? It uses the tor network.
No.1123
pale moon is the best
No.1275
>Come here to finally get rid of Comodo Dragon
>
FUCKING HELL
No.1276
>>573Relatively new here, anyone wanna explain the botnet for chrome? I much prefer it's UI and the compatibility that I have seen from it.
No.1762
>>1276Users on halfchan's /g/ started a running joke about chrome being a botnet. It was so good, that people started believing it and went apeshit when people said to ditch firefox and use Chrome.
No.1787
the internet says rtorrent is a bitrorrent client. Shills shilling shills?
No.1809
>>1762It's not like chrome is good enough for a joke like that to be funny...
No.2225
>>232
https://archive.is/WMTp8
confirmation chrome is a botnet. script blockers dont do shit and even linux is fucked with it.
now go choke on a bag of dicks
No.2243
>>1762
You're right that it's not a botnet. It IS a tracking tool and ad engine for Google. Corporate wants that money.
Although, since the application is closed source, maybe it is a botnet. Same thing with IE/Safari/Opera. Who knows? The whole weird relationship between chrome and Chromium is just begging the question: why re-release an open source application like Chromium as closed source unless you're adding stuff people would get mad about?
If you really want to use chrome, use Chromium instead. Enabling corporate greed and supporting non-free software (especially when an almost identical FOSS copy is available) is unethical and immoral.
No.2258
>>222
>not using Vivaldi
> a browser for our friends.
No.2298
Chrome used to be a mostly light weight and fast browser, then google started marketing it more and adding all kinds of bloat, they even rewrote the UI toolkit, forked webkit and instead of improving the already decent userscript support they forced most users to use the web store.
Opera is dead and other browsers can't handle support six billing pages of html5 specs.
Firefox is still pretty good ignoring the retarded australis interface, crappy versioning and other bloat that has been added recently, the only perfomance issues with it are in some html5 stuff compared to chrome.
No.2738
>>807
Dw, here is an entire site with installers and auto updaters for chromium on all platforms: http://chromium.woolyss.com/
I highly recommend reading through their suggested plugins and settings to ensure privacy.
No.3525
No.3526
>>2225
Even if Chrome stopped be a botnet, I still wouldn't use it. I will not use a browser that will not let you change the position of the tabs. That's just annoying.
No.3534
took me longer than I care to admit to find this thing so I have some extras.
guy sounds a little booty blasted
Personall, I recently switched to seamonkey.
No.3546
>>2258
is it as good as it sounds? how is on memory? is it essentially?opera 2.0?
No.3549
>>3534
Thanks.
I am not sure if Hopeless Tier is discouraged from using here. Is there anything inherently wrong with using these, specifically Sleipnir? I remember using it and it seemed modern and fast, and I can imagine that tab organisation works very well if you can use it, but I found it somewhat messy. So, could anyone here explain why Sleipnir or the other two should (not) be used?
No.3550
>>3534
Firefox has numerous Privacy issues, I don't think it can be considered God Tier anymore.
No.3552
>>3534
>>3546
Third image is OLD. How old is it that it still has Rockmelt in it?
No.3755
>>222
Ive been using Vuze on my mac for years and never had any problem with it. I have also never updated it because It already does everything I need. Recently ads pop up from time to time on the bottom right of the program and they tell me if i upgrade or something the ads will go away. Should I get rid of it?
my personal mac broke. I plan on getting it fixed and installing Ubuntu
No.3783
>>3552
http://rockmelt.com/
at least two years and three months,
>>3549
I think it just says hopeless as in there isn't a usebase for them. As in, it is hopeless for the devs if they are trying to make money off of it.
If it functions and isn't using a modern chrome or firefox backend you are probably fine.
Yes, the image is old, I don't want to make it seem like it is definitive it was just the only one I've ever seen.
No.3808
Firefox should be dropped to the second-to-last tier.
- Removed the option to disable Javascript.
- Showing advertisements every time you open a new tab.
- Requiring add-ons to be "verified" (addons are really the only reason to use firefox in the first place, and soon your favorite addon might be gone).
- Shitty default settings especially privacy wise (sending referer, mainstream default search engines...)
- Badly arranged preferences menu...(well, that's always been there I guess)
- Justifying their bad choices with crappy, fraudulent PR on their website. Blocking comments under certain topics (like the javascript situation).
There's no reason for Firefox anymore, when we have alternatives like IceCat who have the same browsing capabilities without the other problems. But we really should support promising "new blood" like QupZilla, which shows signs of great design behind it, even if it isn't yet fully featured.
No.3822
So, I'm using the botnet.
If I find a link to download chromium, can I import my tabs links and bullshittery to Chromium before purging Chrome?
No.3826
>>1762
>Users on halfchan's /g/ started a running joke about chrome being a botnet.
>joke about chrome being a botnet
>joke
Google Chrome...
1.)Sends the name of the file you're downloading to Google for whitelist checking; stores your IP address associated with the file for a few weeks.[1]
2.)Every URL you even begin to type in the address bar is sent to Google, in whole or in fragments, for auto-completion purposes.[2][3]
3.)Connects to Google every 30 minutes to download a list of malicious URLs, so the fact that you even have Chrome open is transmitted to Google.[1]
4.)Asks you to login to your Google account, so your browsing tabs, history, etc. is stored on Google servers.[4]
5.)Connects to websites in the background before you are even finished typing them in, without your explicit instruction.[5]
6.)Contains an RLZ identifier, an encoded string sent together with all queries to Google.[6]
Summary: There is nothing, nothing, you can do in Chrome that isn't transmitted to Google through some channel.
Welcome to the botnet.
>>http://8ch.net/tech/res/9176.html
this poster is a shill faggot
No.3827
>>3822
I hate to burst your bubble, but Chromium is still a botnet. So is Iridium.
Just use Qupzilla, Midori, or Pale Moon.
No.3849
>>222
I, for one, use Opera Developer. It's like:
- As fast as Chrome
- Don't have memory leaks like Firefox
- Don't consume RAM like the monster Chrome
- Have all the add-ons of Chrome
- It's Norwegian, has no fucking Jews or SJWs
Only downside: Still waiting for 64-bit version, and developers said they will soon deliver.
But still, I'm closely following Vivaldi's news and waiting for something stable (the current experience is not that great).
No.3850
No.3856
>MaxthonB. > I don't know kek, but also botnet
>Chrome > King of The Botnet Paradise; only have better performance in facebook
>Firefox > Blessed by the power of the community addons. uMatrix + Noscript + uBlock Origin + Greasemonkey (Viewtube+). Fucked up by the updates. Unsafe VoIP or Online Bookmarks integrated
>IceCat > Better than Firefox, is almost clean or safe. Its safe to use.
>Palemoon > Old Firefox. Fast. But some sites never will work
>Vivaldi > Nice one, I can't tell much, have chromium addons; Viewtube didn't work. HTML5 Player fails
>Opera > Almost another chromium browser
>Qupzilla > Fast with some Plugins installed; User Script support + Adblock
>Otter > Is the best one, is like Opera 12x but needs something like Greasemonkey (for Viewtube)
>Midori > Crash almost all the time, (good for old computers? best Otter)
No.3863
>>3849
is that was opera next was?
No.3887
>>3850
I like it, but the dev doesn't appear to care about it anymore.
No.3914
Im using Opera because its fast, has all the addons I need and it isnt a botnet. Ive tried Vivaldi and its okay but it uses a lot of RAM at the moment and lacks a lot of addons, so it overall could use some polishing, but im sure once the devs make it better ill switch over from Opera because its only a matter of time before Opera becomes a botnet like the other big browsers.
No.3919
No.4005
>>232
>you can even turn off NSA spying in chrome's advanced settings
>google saves the day again
No.4006
>>3534
>Firefox is stable
Oh you
No.4007
No.4012
>>232
Ad block has been ineffective on it for many users- gee, wonder why.
>>222
uTorrent includes a bitcoin miner.
No.4015
>>4007
The list basically means Firefox or any of its forks become suckless once it has Vimperator, VimFX or (I assume so because it's a fork of the first one) Pentadactyl.
No.4016
>>3856
do palemoon and icecat have the same memory issues as firefox does?