[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / arepa / bestemma / cutebois / film / komica / tacos / tk ]

/gnosticwarfare/ - The Future of AI Conflict

All things Butterfly War, New Emotion, and Gnostic Warfare
Winner of the 62rd Attention-Hungry Games
/eris/ - Wherein Is Explained Absolutely Everything Worth Knowing About Absolutely Anything.

November 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
Verification *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options


Cogops > Psyops


93243e  No.156

I do not consider myself a smart person. I have experience that has proven as much, at least academically to me. Despite this, I would like to think I have found a shred of wisdom for myself through my experiences, which has lead me here.

I know the follies of overstating my intelligence and the fallacies that can result from others doing the same. I think I'm smart enough to recognize the situation I am in and understand the absolute basics of infosec, metadata and the way megacorps use both. I am the most basic of analysts, someone who has a decent grasp of economics, a capable understanding of the human nature and a genuine interest in what makes the human mind tick, and more importantly, the way the human mind affects economics and technology by extension. Having followed the butterfly war thread(s), I found myself lost in some of the deeper technological meanings on some subjects, so I thought that a thread was due to consider how the situation could be more easily explained to those who have the capability, but not the prerequisite knowledge.

tl;dr what is the intelligent normalfag's role in the butterfly war and the skirmishes of gnostic warfare? This mostly applies to the "educated anon" role that will utilize and manipulate the tools that CS is developing to fuck about with the status quo once the phrenology manipulation tools become (relatively) mainstream.

deb2cb  No.168

>>156

I agree. I'll be breaking Butterfly War down into digestible chunks over the next month.

Regarding immediate action you can take on Butterfly War, You'll want to start with meta data collection to get a baseline. One enterprising anon mentioned buying old Obama phones from eBay. Those things are packed with meta data which, if properly extracted, can deliver tremendous training material for future automated operations.

A second plan would be to put out nets of your own. Create mobile apps that appeal to specific demographics and collect the meta data as you go. Sell it for a few bucks and see if you can convert the app to something monetizable to help justify continual operation.

You'll want to collect accelerometer and gyro data fro motion analysis, app usage time for employment analysis, battery life statistics to evaluate a users capacity for planning, GPS and network data to get location trends, messages for sentiment analysis, contacts for social analysis, heatmaps for touch behavior, image sensors for facial recognition, etc.

Build an app that requires all of this (a game, for example) and market it to the desired demographic then collect all the data. Your data will be a useful training set in the future.


36be35  No.270

>>168

I think I'm getting it, but what can possibly be done against total political control, total monetary control, and the Samson Option?

Kittens and Rainbows

Post last edited at

7f4d1a  No.277

>>270

This is the new brown pill?


36be35  No.282

>>277

No, I'm just the most content person you'll ever meet. Continue to do whatever you're going to do, just know that it's probably being counteracted as soon as you do it. That's the nature of Fate.

Post last edited at

36be35  No.328

>>277

>>282

He's editing my posts because I am a bad faith actor who wants to spread demoralization instead of engaging in conversation.

Post last edited at

9c3983  No.385

>>168

I figured this would be the best place to ask something like this.

CultState, do you think there could be different types/branches of this Butterfly War idea? I know your main iteration is mostly focused on turning their own algorithms against them so that they're basically consumed by their own digital fire, but I was thinking about things along the lines of camouflaging oneself through either sarcasm or intentional misrepresentation so that while the algorithms don't pick up on it, people will and they'll be exposed to beneficial propaganda.

A lot of /pol/acks, either by will or by necessity, already hide their power level, and if you extend that idea even in normal, non-digital interactions, you can subvert the leftist concepts really easily. This is even more pronounced if you pose as one of their own, making them eat their own "deconstruction of ideas" poison to the point that it overwhelms their own politics.

I think similar ideas to the Butterfly War can be applied with considerable success in these typically normal moderated-by-consensus discussion spaces, especially ones considered "safe," as in almost exclusively leftist and often academic in the sense that when there's no other scapegoat for the left to push poison at, they'll consume their own all too eagerly


deb2cb  No.386

>>385

> do you think there could be different types/branches of this Butterfly War idea? I know your main iteration is mostly focused on turning their own algorithms against them so that they're basically consumed by their own digital fire, but I was thinking about things along the lines of camouflaging oneself through either sarcasm or intentional misrepresentation so that while the algorithms don't pick up on it, people will and they'll be exposed to beneficial propaganda.

Yes, of course. There will be millions of iterations and variations of this idea. The current investment structure of AI makes the entire surface area of entire nations incredibly easy to toy with. Sarcasm research has been done extensively. Double meaning is still a tough nut to crack, which is why my Incorrect Synonym attack works.

> A lot of /pol/acks, either by will or by necessity, already hide their power level, and if you extend that idea even in normal, non-digital interactions, you can subvert the leftist concepts really easily. This is even more pronounced if you pose as one of their own, making them eat their own "deconstruction of ideas" poison to the point that it overwhelms their own politics.

A fun side effect of the censorship wars is that /pol/lacks hide their power level online.

I'm slap in the middle of Hollywood in the belly of the beast and I -never- hide my power level in person. I've even been able to secure tacit support for eugenics in ground zero of this Leftist cathedral shithole. How? Try this out next time for fun:

> “Oh, you think seeking guidance for genetic health is taboo? Yeah? How many people with down syndrome have you had sex with? Exactly.”

I can't keep getting away with it, and yet, I do. How? Simple.

The more we deny our power level online, either by self-censorship, filter bubble distribution, or active suppression, the more the Left can't develop an immunity to these ideas in person. Basically, without proper inoculation online, our ideas become exotic in person. With a tinge of framing and a dab of storytelling skills, even the most ardent Leftist can be brought to a beneficial perspective to consider on their own time. It's not a matter of tricking or hacking them. It's just understanding that the Left is mostly a psychotribe rooted in seeking proximity memetic purity, not pragmatic reality. They live and breathe symbols as absolutes and exotic variations to symbols are the most appealing of all.

Sure, the hatchet jobs to cast anyone darker than coffee as a genocidal Nazi are prime time bread and circus, but there isn't a member on /pol/ on any Chan literally goosestepping on cured Jew skin in their grandfather's SS garb. /pol/ isn't about purity. It is about the eternal mutation of our ideas along the lines of pragmatic adaptation, not memetic purity. Do we need to adopt a Egyptian chaos frog who has suspicious ties to notorious homosexual fixer Roy Cohn in order to bring our ideas to the mainstream? Yes? THEN FUCK IT, IT SHALL BE SO. This is the /pol/ I know and love.

You don't “win” meme wars by destroying contending memes. You either make your memes exotic variants of theirs or you make memes expressing human behavior that previously hasn't been correctly identified but is known by many none the less.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / arepa / bestemma / cutebois / film / komica / tacos / tk ]