[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / acme / animu / arepa / ecopol / hispint / sunny / tacos / vichan ]

/gnosticwarfare/ - The Future of AI Conflict

All things Butterfly War, New Emotion, and Gnostic Warfare


July 2018 Transparency Report
Comment *
Verification *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Cogops > Psyops

f2f7d1 No.1[Reply]

Welcome to Gnostic Warfare

We're here to explore the Butterfly War and the New Emotion thought experiment.

How Can I Get Started?

* Understand the Battlespace- >>87

* Follow these instructions to see 8chan how (((AI))) sees it - >>101

* Training Overview: https://app.milanote.com/1FjzOb11HKlU7x

* Information Science: >>158

* Epistemology: https://app.milanote.com/1FjLbD16uYE38O/epistemology

* Cognition: https://app.milanote.com/1FjzPC11HKlU7O/cognition

* Machine Learning https://app.milanote.com/1FjzPC11HKlU7N/machine-learning

* Geopolitics: https://app.milanote.com/1FjV1313xyfQ8X/geopolitics

* Finance (Coming soon)

* Legal(Coming soon)

* Organization and Leadership (Coming soon)

* Butterfly War Code Repositories: >>340


* CultState - http://www.cultstate.com

* ButterflyPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Post last edited at

91effd No.380[Reply]

The war is in full swing. Be sure to contribute.

d7f6c6 No.193[Reply]

This past few weeks has been very active. From the /pol/ ban to the /pol/ mod replacement, to Bilderberg, to G7, to the whole CEMEX mess.. let me provide some insights on what is all means, what is coming, and what to do about it.

The Milanote I've created is designed to teach people the basics of information entropy, the science behind information theory, and prepare them for the philosophical insights describing the evolution of neurons. Each video covers the basics and is about ten minutes in length with helpful animations, good voice work, and fairly good production values. They provide an incredibly useful overview of the large body of knowledge you'll need to take on to participate effectively in Gnostic Warfare operations. For reference, here is the link: https://app.milanote.com/1FjzOb11HKlU7x/gnostic-warfare

31 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

647500 No.323


2nd Law does not account for gravity. 2nd Law only holds in constant gravity gradient.

>>do twice as many computations to save power

heat loss is a thing

44ffd5 No.376

So, uh, why is this board dead when the butterfly war is actually popping off in the mainstream for the first time?

d60c44 No.377


>butterfly war is actually popping off in the mainstream

Is it? Post links if you have em.

44ffd5 No.378


>ht tp://dailycaller.com/2018/08/05/twitter-suspends-candace-owens/

Targeted Twitter trolling got Twitter to develop an auto-moderation AI that effectively bans any user who uses the word "Jew" in a negative context. This led to a BASTE black lady gettinf suspended for switching "white" for "jew" but not for switching it with "black".

Now the online dissident right waa already up in arms about that but then the biggest names in Silicon Valley decided to ban InfoWars all at once. Now even sites like HN are beginning to wake up to the reality of the war being fought right in front of their faces. Just look at this comment thread for starters: ht tps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17709329

The fire rises.

d60c44 No.379


I have noticed more unabashed double-standards from the left in terms of speech policing; the veil is being lifted. It seems Twitter will have to actually clarify their anti-white stance.

I think this board is basically dead until CultState gives us some real, actionable information/code/program that the likes of /pol/ can sink their teeth into. Implied future code that can mask shitposting with minority metadata is a nice idea, but right now these concepts are only concepts. Of course, if CultState is up to far more important things that the likes of brainlets like me simply can't fathom, I'm actually, genuinely fine with that. That said, I would like some more input from CultState - the last posts he made on /pol/ have been slid completely off the board, along with his thread.

7937a4 No.375[Reply]


> Moore’s Law states the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles about every two years. By doubling the transistor density, the time to perform information labor halves. This results in the reduction of price for media creation, data analysis, and data collection while simultaneously increasing its distribution potential. This also drives an increase of the volume of domestic and foreign signal analysis competition against bloated, unaccountable centralized state-backed intelligence agencies. As Moore’s Law makes information processing cheaper, the blackmail network that keeps the nuclear paradigm stable can be discovered, evaluated, and captured in part or in whole by any upcoming competiton. Deterring this outcome has become increasingly difficult for state actors as processors, data centers, and data science techniques become cheaper and more abundant. The Hapsburg-dominated Church once experienced this same exact problem within the context of the printing press, and in a way, the transistor is the American printing press, but that’s an analysis for another day.

> The insurance file for Julian Assange is a massive collection of encrypted data. The unencrypted contents of that file have kept him alive through two administrations. This has made him a difficult person to make an example out of because I suspect within that insurance file is a significant number of video footage, images, and information about the blackmail network. Upon Assange’s death, his deadman switch will activate, and the key to unlock those files will be available to all who have downloaded the file. What options do central intelligence agencies have to thwart this trend?

d2aa4a No.226[Reply]

To help prepare for the shit that is about to hit the fan, I am implementing a dual canary scheme. This is NOT LIVE and is currently EXPERIMENTAL ONLY.

When this is made live, this thread will be deleted and a new one will be created with the final rules.

Experimental: Proof of Consistency

With the aggressive removal of the blackmail network that kept South Korea in line with globalist agendas, the sixty-five year war between the Koreas is starting to come to a close. This means the nullification of future loans (and interest) to pay for defense spending and post-war construction loans… and the internationalist banking elite are not happy. They will be preparing a worldwide multi-domain counterattack and Chan culture is in the cross hairs.

Chan culture is a vital part of the pro-national Trump infrastructure. Since Henry Kissinger, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Bilderberg have made media appearances in the wake of the Butterfly War problem, We’ve already seen an uptick in bot spamming and poor Markov mirroring on /pol/. These bots were trained on poster data in which, ironically, came from well-meaning /pol/ users themselves. As they labeled clearly disruptive posters as “shills”. This phrase is a special and organic classifier that flags the offending post as containing content as an accurate disruptor of Chan community. Those flagged posts have been used to train an anti-/pol/ neural network which is now being unleashed upon us and being fine-tuned for maximum efficiency. In addition to this, you’re going to see enhanced isolation and virality disruption campaigns. All of these tactics work in concert to ensure your next wave of meme war fails. If you haven’t been engaging in Butterfly War by now, this is a good time to start. It’s a surefire way to spread your memes under these incredible restrictions.

This also means targeting influencers. My honeypots are on fire these days and I’ve had to put Icarus on a kill switch. I suspect these attackers are not global observers because global observers knew I had a MAC whitelist on my routers. This means the partiesPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

9 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

d2aa4a No.370


come on bruh

there's no data there


d2aa4a No.371


disregard that, i suck cocks

header was bad, fixed it

d2aa4a No.372



hrmmmm maybe the board mangled some characters?

d2aa4a No.373



oh i see

you're a windows user, okay

lemme see what I can do

99616a No.374


>muh proof of life

No one is going to murder you for writing javascript helper utilities and larping as a hacker.

307a60 No.247[Reply]

Battlespace Analysis


This is a high-level overview of the infrastructure, personnel, and operational behavior of the efforts being deployed to suppress, disrupt, distract, and infiltrate /pol/

The purpose of this analysis is to compromise the efficiency of neural networks and bots while forcing your adversaries to rely entirely on memetically-susceptible humans.

30 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

ec6b25 No.330


Just to reiterate my previous point, not only am I a bad faith actor trying to demoralize the board, but I post three posts to make sure that all actual replies and comments aren't seen on the front page for new comers.

I pretty much deserve the way I'm being treated right now.

Post last edited at

280d8a No.347

Until recently, nearly any input could fool an object recognition model. We were more surprised when object recognition worked than when it didn't. Today, object recognition algorithms have reached human performance as measured by some test set benchmarks, and we are surprised that they fail to perform as well on unnatural inputs. Adversarial examples are synthetic examples constructed by modifying real examples slightly in order to make a classifier believe they belong to the wrong class with high confidence. Rubbish class examples (such as fooling images) are pathological examples that the model assigns to some class with high confidence even though they should not belong to any class.

Myth: Adversarial examples do not matter because they do not occur in practice.

Fact: It's true that adversarial examples are very unlikely to occur naturally. However, adversarial examples matter because training a model to resist them can improve its accuracy on non-adversarial examples. Adversarial examples also can occur in practice if there really is an adversary - for example, a spammer trying to fool a spam detection system.

Myth: Deep learning is more vulnerable to adversarial examples than other kind of machine learning.

Fact: So far we have been able to generate adversarial examples for every model we have tested, including simple traditional machine learning models like nearest neighbor. Deep learning with adversarial training is the most resistant technique we have studied so far.

Myth: Adversarial examples are hard to find, occurring in small pockets.

Fact: Most arbitrary points in space are misclassified. For example, one network we tested classified roughly 70% of random noise samples as being horses with high confidence.

Myth: The best we can do is identify and refuse to process adversarial examples.

Fact: Refusing to process an adversarial example is better than misclassifying it, but not a satisfying solution. When there truly is an adversary, such as a spammer, the adversary would still gain an advantage by producing examples our system refused to classify. We know it isPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

e79913 No.348

CS - are you familiar with HLI / Three

307a60 No.362


This is a good find. I'm a huge proponent of adversarial training due to its implied biomimicry.

> Refusing to process an adversarial example is better than misclassifying it, but not a satisfying solution.

I wonder what happens when this is paired with knockout training… could be exciting!


I am not.

8d53a3 No.369


>Myth: No one knows whether the human brain makes similar mistakes.

>If our brains made the same kind of mistakes as machine learning models, then adversarial examples for machine learning models would be optical illusions for us,

Doesn't the second portion logically imply that optical illusions are the equivalent of adversarial examples for the human brain? It's important to note the difference between human object recognition and machine based object recognition but I think it's plainly obvious that human object recognition is also prone to certain types of error.

One personal anecdote that shows the weakness of human object recognition mechanisms (or at least mine) is my frequent inability to recognize a familiar object when looking for it when it is in an unfamiliar place. Example: I need a specific piece of mail so I start looking for it in my office mail pile. I'll spend 10 minutes looking for it all over the place only to give up, sit down at my desk, and realize it was sitting right there the whole time. My mind presumes a location for that object and combines the symbols of the envelope and the mail pile to forma the expected image of what I'm looking for (that envelope buried in a pile of mail). However, if that presumption is wrong and that expected image too strongly encoded in the mental process of searching for that object, then I am unable to recognize thaf object independently of the expected image. Basically, our brains (or at least mine) have developed highly efficient processes that allow us to identify objects based on logically deduced expectations of future events. This works great up until the foundational "training data" upon which those expectations are based is fundamentally wrong. I also think this plays heavily into the trait of "adaptability", the logical depth at which the foundational "training data" is based, the more flexible the process becomes.

e7f9f5 No.2[Reply]

The New Emotion Thought Experiment Continues

This is a continuation of a thread that endured for the last four months. >>11101940 (https://archive.fo/2O6Ww). The thread was a complex reveal of the Butterfly War after Eric Schmidt had stepped down and my honeypots were compromised:

>The Butterfly War (https://archive.fo/eYWmC) is a tactic to hijack and control censorious artificial intelligence platforms by training it with spoofed meta data. The meta data is prevalidated and refined by comparing ads to the behavior they generate . You can trick a censorship platform into thinking you are a minority by experimenting with on new social media accounts. Once you start seeing ads that a specific minority should see, you will know you’ve tricked the AI.

<Butterfly War forces Silicon Valley to categorize the cyber phrenological behavior of minorities to determine if a black person is a real black person or if a female is a real female, which means they will have to violate civil rights law to build lists of “approved minority behavior” in order to keep their censorship ambitions alive. The fallout from Cambridge Analytica has proven social justice warrior insiders working at major social media companies can be steered into embracing this direction.

>Pairing Butterfly War with redlining legislation to build the case for “disparate impact” can force Silicon Valley to be found guilty of civil rights violations. Eisenhower set the precedent for executive enforcement of civil rights by military means in the 1950s and I have no doubt such a bargaining chip is something Trump would have no hesitation anteing up with. This means Silicon Valley will have to deploy its massive lobbying assets to UNDERMINE civil rights legislation for its own protection. In essence, social justice warriors can be tricked into destroying the legislated morality that has served as their moral foundation since the 1960s.

I shared Butterfly War to Soros-linked playePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

200 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

e7f9f5 No.364


When I started research on The Empath, I found that one could begin to implement even the most primitive AI to steer society as long as you could alter the behavior of humans. Getting AI to a point where its powerful and can be put on a leash is complicated, but getting humans to act to act within constraints is so extremely well known, we have abundant infrastructure in place to do exactly that at all times.

As perverse as this is going to sound, once I realized that, getting better performance (and profitability) out of AI investments could be achieved by "hacking morality" to make humans more AI-compliant. An example would be Twitter. It has 140 characters, so it forces humans to be concise about their language usage, allowing AI to make some sense of it. Hashtags are just classifiers. Humans could be made to abandon the vast majority of their lexical capabilities in exchange for blasting a "tweet" across large numbers of people, and thus, providing a cheap proxy to fulfill our drive for socialization. This in turn provided a foundation for AI to then feedback and steer the content and then the content creators themselves.

When taken to its logical conclusion, this model of farming AI-compliant human behavior could be applied to politics, warfare, banking, and even religion. As long as moral expectations can be swayed, repositioned, conflated, altered, or otherwise mutated, then AI-compliant behavior can be achieved.

These assumptions about AI-compliant human behavior for could, arguably, act as the "innate psychology" of such AIs, and that is what Gnostic Warfare is designed to target. :D

> The Immortal Poor

I'm sure you know this by now, but I wrote that story. I am also the Abusive Oracle. That short story was inspired by the The Empath. In the book, advanced humans are made from experiments on genomics and neurology made possible from Neanderthals… but once such a technique became profitable, it would eventually be refined and applied to labor,Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

8f9ff1 No.365



Thats good enough for me.

I´m gonna have to up my catch up game to be of some use with and against this force amplifier (narrow AI).

f4ea87 No.366


GitGud repos /and/ a Trello? Seems like you've been busy OP.

It's nice to see you've taken (and extended) my ideas of automation, I became concerned it might escalate things a little too quickly for us to keep up with. The Milanote also makes me wonder where else one of those boards may prove useful. Now, I have a few more things I've been pondering:

Would you be able to hash a snapshot of The Empath for us, as a proof of writing?

Decentralised or automated moderation of communities in 2018 is not viable with our current understanding of the epistemic limitations of AI, which you say as much yourself. Would this pose as much of a worry to you if most all of the financial and technological barriers to hosting a forum and delivering a lot of data with high throughput worldwide were removed from the equation? If any dissatisfied group could branch off on their own whims?

What would happen to the old media if people discovered they didn't need to kowtow to ICANN, their ISP or other providers to share their content? What effects would this have?

Does competition kill innovation?

What if the Wayback Machine could host anything, and could never have anything removed unless 100% of humans stopped caring about preserving it? What if everybody could run a library?

What if we brought Spacechan to the ground? Then, brought it back up to space?

When did you get rid of those glorious locks?

963a11 No.367


I also forgot to mention, I was curious if anyone here had came across a certain individual who posts often on /bmw/ and Reddit. He goes by several names - Eris, Aminom Marvin, and Carl, which I believe is his birth name. He fancies himself a 'memetic engineer', and reminded me of OP (and the original Butterfly War thread) in several ways, only with extra narcissism and grandeur, transhumanism and an unfortunate penchant for communism.

He has detailed his memetic experiments on 4chan's /x/ as well as other places - including his 'Tao of Calculus', 'Virus 23' and 'The Antientropy Project' - and alleges that "the War to End All Wars is over, and that we are in a post-war reconstruction period", alluding to a grand Discordian conspiracy stretching back a few decades to remove the 'negative meme viruses' that he perceives as having infected us, with the help of the establishment.

There is plenty I find content with, but he is no doubt quite intelligent, and has a lot of interesting content out there, including his graph on recursive autological structures and a piece he wrote on 'memetic fingerprints' which I found to be quite insightful. And maybe others here will too.







https://image.ibb.co/jWL6vS/taoofcPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

963a11 No.368


>I find content


Mind the changing IP.

d276a9 No.340[Reply]

Butterfly War Code Repository


This thread is for the discussion of the new Butterfly War code project. I have broken down all of the domains of work into individual projects, complete with milestones and high-level issues. Discussions about individual issues should take place at the issue. General discussions can take place here.

These repositories should be publicly visible , but you will have to apply to be a Member to each project in order to contribute.

These code bases will be open source.

62238b No.349

Is it just me or is there no code in those repos.

d276a9 No.361


There is no code at this time. The project is being organized at a high-level to help anons (agnons?) get the 40,000 foot view.

Over time, code will trickle in. Right now, I am experimenting with candidates for data lake landing zone management.


I'm currently writing this to get the process started. The –encrypt flag currently doesn't work, but that will get fixed so

021a21 No.79[Reply]

I've enjoyed reading what you're putting out there for the past few months, and I find myself in a place where I would like to contribute in some way.

Any suggestions? I don't do Facebook, Twitter or YouTube and pretty averse to IRL activism but would be open to spreading the word online somehow if that would help.

21 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

1013dd No.355


>I eventually succumbed to psychosis

Were you mentally stable prior to this, or were you gaslit into psychosis?

>Also sidenote: is there a good automated process for registering fake social media accounts?

Very tricky these days because new accounts require a phone number for verification, and they have blocked most (all?) of the texting app numbers. The only routes I can think of these days involve burner SIMs or buying accounts.

ff2df5 No.356


I was gaslit into psychosis. I was mentally stable for the majority of gamergate until late 2015 / early 2016. I then connected the dots in a weird way and got super paranoid and and stopped trusting everyone, even my closest friends and family. I spent the next 2 years in and out of hospitals and had to have monthly appointments, each time they put me on different antipsychotics, ssris, benzodiazepines. I don't know what drug was the worst but I went off the deep end and started abusing them. I ended up in this weird suggestable haze and I almost got arrested after breaking into the college trying to get to the server room. I felt compelled to do that like I HAD to do it or else I would die. I lost my entire sense of self. Subconsciously I knew something was wrong and it was trying to correct what was wrong and I ended up having weird psychedelic experiences where my anima was talking to me trying to help me. I eventually worked up the courage to quit my medication in november and ever since then I've been exponentially getting better.

My last visit to the hospital was at the beginning of my withdrawal process where I kept talking about Q and Terry Davis for some reason.

In the end I ended up getting admitted a total of 5 times.

I'm really mad about the whole situation. I was doing alright in college until gamergate happened. I just wanted to make vidya and ended up in a long term culture war with disingenuous subversive fucks.

I have a major interest in systems / IT / netsec now because of this whole fiasco so I guess that's my silver lining. I've eased my way into GNU / linux since then and have slowly become more competent with it on a base level but I just passed the initial learning curve and the more complex stuff is just outside my range of complexity.

Psychosis is a weird experience. It's like you are there but aren't fully aware with what's going on. I let the mask slip almost voluntarily a few times and I was taken for a ride by the state medical system. Some helpful advice to others in a similarPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

ff2df5 No.357


>Category: Threatened

wew lad this script really is spooky

1013dd No.358


>Psychosis is a weird experience. It's like you are there but aren't fully aware with what's going on.

It's a very strange thing to go through. I've been through similar experiences, although I never got institutionalized or prescribed that many medications.

>I've come to realize that I know too much and anything outside normie thinking is scary for the average person.

It sucks, but hiding our power levels is incredibly important. I've reached a point where I have accepted it and don't experience angst over that, but I remember how difficult it was to come to terms with that fact.

>I'm really mad about the whole situation.

I believe /gnosticwarfare/ is definitely the best way to get revenge for all of this. "Don't get mad, get even." We're going to burn (((their))) empire to the ground and laugh while we're doing it. Hell, we already are.

>Sorry if this was a blogpost but my experience might be somewhat useful

That';s for the BO to decide, but it's rather motivating for me to hear stories like this. I'm not the only one who's gone through this. You aren't the only one who's gone through this. We've been gaslit, but (((they))) could only make that last for so long.

705239 No.359



GamerGate was a cultural shift for many. For the institutionally-trained counter-culture consumers who grew up with fairy tales about the moral supremacy of the 1960s, GamerGate demonstrated harsh competition against their precious monopoly on rebellion. For the displaced nationalist who has been sidelined since the Saudis took control of the Earth, it was an unprecedented repudiation against the contemporary humanist cathedral. To the new generation, it was a coming-of-age event that will stay with them well into their nostalgia years. The entire event was planned, the actors were prepared in advance, and almost everyone who tried to attach their own personal pet cause harness on it with intentions of steering not only failed, but were burned by it as well.

Don't let the dropout thing bum you out. I never went to college and I had spent my early twenties living in poverty, doing landscaping with illegal immigrants to get by. If you need help getting started on machine learning, check out the Milanote: https://app.milanote.com/1FjzPC11HKlU7N/machine-learning In the meantime, continue to brush up on your IT basics, get a good handle on Linux, and delve into DevOps and cloud management.

Social media is a Skinner box designed to minimize investment while maximizing dopamine. It's important to have been scarred by such a perpetual sociological experiment… those wounds demystify the platform and allow you to think of it in terms of conquest and power.

The “medical” detention you endured first appeared under the Soviet Union. Their term for it was “philosophical intoxication” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union)

>The term "philosopPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

84f0df No.352[Reply]

Using Machine Learning to automatically detect antifa in Twitter


(Sentiment Analysis, Blocktogethers, CNNs and LSTMs, Emoji/Keyword Extraction)

Use Machine Learning and Image manipulation to flag (((Jews)))


(Facial Landmarks, image CNNs, Dataset Gathering)

Instead of using "subliminal" methods, one must first understand using ML in an easier manner to target the enemy's foot soldiers.

ea7eff No.126[Reply]

In 2005, I wrote The Empath, a book about an AI platform that understands human emotions and then manipulates them to predict and control elections and markets. Two weeks ago, I dropped a hint about how to build such a machine on /pol/.

In the book, a company named Promethia engineers people with significant alterations to their brains. The vast majority of such experiments end in complete failures because the link between DNA and neurology is incredibly complex. Eventually, a good-enough technique is discovered.

The company engineeers two children, Sen and Cari. Sen is a child who has no capacity for human emotion other than experiencing perpetual, sheer terror. His ability to comprehend mathematical complexity, however, is unrivaled in all of human history. He develops new techniques to reduce decoherence problems of quantum computing, allowing the development of the primary AI in the story, Esai. His twin sister, Cari, exists for the sole purpose of providing emotional comfort and support to Sen.

Trying to develop such mathematical prowess in a single human proved to be extremely difficult, so they settled for twins: one with a mind that is barely stable enough to endure on a day-to-day basis and another with a deep emotional bond to keep him stable. The key to getting to this point was a legal innovation.

Creating human clones is mostly illegal. Experimenting on humans, clone or not, is incredibly illegal. So Promethia leverages paleogenetics to create Neanderthal brains. They aren't human legally, so there's no prohibition on experimentation, and they are similar enough to humans to help improve research.

Today, the world has caught up to my idea:


For those who remember, I posted this pic on the now deleted /pol/ thread. It was a brief timPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

6e50f2 No.149


oldfag here. I'm feeling the pulse, it sort of reminds me a bit of 2013-2014 /pol/, but it's too early to say for sure yet. out of the chaos is emerging new OC threads, this is the bread and butter of /pol/ culture. the shills, trolls and other foreigner invaders to the board will make the true /pol/ack stronger, for he will be reminded he is constantly under assault.

ca7695 No.150


Posting wihtou a VPN, because fuck there is no use to try and hide my traffick anymore. Yes I'm also an oldfag and am feeling the pulse getting stronger, I was too hasty to come to that conclusion, for over a year the board was dead to me, but it was useful because shills, specially 3 letter ones and bots are fucking dumb and we were tracking all of it… Still I got reliable Intel, but wished it stayed dead just a little longer. I just gotta get used to it again, but as far as my efforts on board analysis goes, there is 4x times the amount of shills as before.


I am just being sincere. While I do have interest in parts of your work for my own plans, you are changing how I view the world, enlarging the scope of my big picture… One that clearly was not as big as I thought. As I stated a couple of times what I'm doing is a solid plan B or C. I need to put more work on your CogOps as in mine.

If only we could measure how loyal anons were trough Chan's without piercing anonymity, we could set up a mutual crypto fund, one everyone had access and took as needed to keep his ops running. But right now this would back fire monumentally. Just to be clear by no means I operate at the same level as you, I'm a firm believer you are the one of a kind, at some point in time I thought someone like you gonne Galt.

On your second reply, this is a normal biological response from leftists, like cells trying to mimic others so the body ignores you while you damage it, but I came to the conclusion autists evolve too fast, and this " loss " is needed to usher new, more powerful memes. I will try to write some OC this weekend and post it and see what it breads, will try to introduce aspects of the GW/BW into it. One of my OCs was the first post on why /pol/ don't have its own land, and did little intervention on its evolutionary process. I did others, few more impactful but I still not meddle with it. An necessary evil as you might know.

As fag as it'Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

ea7eff No.152


Agreed. The only true state of /pol/ is of tumult. Newfags need to go through the ringer like we did and develop their own immunities and conclusions. But we should assist where we can: our initial exposure wasn't embroiled in gnostic combat with the Council on Foreign Relations. They will need our guidance.


Loyalty is always liquid and it tends to move where pressure forces it. I'd be interested in a Proof of Stake so research contributions are properly cited. Sort of a blockchain to accumulate, track, and reward think tank participation.

People would post their wallet address in the subject and if the contribution is useful, a small but transparent council would recognize the contribution and attach it to a new block based on a smart contract vote. Mining profits derived from the block would be awarded to the contributor. While such a system would make this board one of the most active on 8chan, it would also open up a torrent of content I'm not prepared to sift through.

Looking forward to your contributions. Your brain is what we need to make this work and I'm glad you're reviving it for this. :D

I'd have to look into it.

62697a No.204



Humans create or manifest in a synergy between mind and emotions, but the source is in the inner body. Its our link to "god."

You cannot get a machine to "create" like we create. At best, you can have an AI brain, with a human attached somehow, with them synergistic-ally working together.

bb945a No.343


What if the intelligence is instantiated at the quantum level with true quantum computing? If that is possible, then it is technically not AI at that point, but man-made quantum intelligence.

93243e No.156[Reply]

I do not consider myself a smart person. I have experience that has proven as much, at least academically to me. Despite this, I would like to think I have found a shred of wisdom for myself through my experiences, which has lead me here.

I know the follies of overstating my intelligence and the fallacies that can result from others doing the same. I think I'm smart enough to recognize the situation I am in and understand the absolute basics of infosec, metadata and the way megacorps use both. I am the most basic of analysts, someone who has a decent grasp of economics, a capable understanding of the human nature and a genuine interest in what makes the human mind tick, and more importantly, the way the human mind affects economics and technology by extension. Having followed the butterfly war thread(s), I found myself lost in some of the deeper technological meanings on some subjects, so I thought that a thread was due to consider how the situation could be more easily explained to those who have the capability, but not the prerequisite knowledge.

tl;dr what is the intelligent normalfag's role in the butterfly war and the skirmishes of gnostic warfare? This mostly applies to the "educated anon" role that will utilize and manipulate the tools that CS is developing to fuck about with the status quo once the phrenology manipulation tools become (relatively) mainstream.

deb2cb No.168


I agree. I'll be breaking Butterfly War down into digestible chunks over the next month.

Regarding immediate action you can take on Butterfly War, You'll want to start with meta data collection to get a baseline. One enterprising anon mentioned buying old Obama phones from eBay. Those things are packed with meta data which, if properly extracted, can deliver tremendous training material for future automated operations.

A second plan would be to put out nets of your own. Create mobile apps that appeal to specific demographics and collect the meta data as you go. Sell it for a few bucks and see if you can convert the app to something monetizable to help justify continual operation.

You'll want to collect accelerometer and gyro data fro motion analysis, app usage time for employment analysis, battery life statistics to evaluate a users capacity for planning, GPS and network data to get location trends, messages for sentiment analysis, contacts for social analysis, heatmaps for touch behavior, image sensors for facial recognition, etc.

Build an app that requires all of this (a game, for example) and market it to the desired demographic then collect all the data. Your data will be a useful training set in the future.

36be35 No.270


I think I'm getting it, but what can possibly be done against total political control, total monetary control, and the Samson Option?

Kittens and Rainbows

Post last edited at

7f4d1a No.277


This is the new brown pill?

36be35 No.282


No, I'm just the most content person you'll ever meet. Continue to do whatever you're going to do, just know that it's probably being counteracted as soon as you do it. That's the nature of Fate.

Post last edited at

36be35 No.328



He's editing my posts because I am a bad faith actor who wants to spread demoralization instead of engaging in conversation.

Post last edited at

365001 No.319[Reply]

0cde9f No.158[Reply]

Information Science Training

Getting a firm understanding of information science, and specifically, information entropy, provides essential context about the structural limitations of artificial intelligence. While knowing the basics of information science assists with understanding contemporary cryptography, understanding how information relates to energy broadens your horizons and allows you detect epistemological gaps in machine learning processes. For example, information inputs into a system correlate to an increase of energy within a system. This is true for black holes, computer networks, machine learning processes, neurology, and cognition.

You can review the full Milanote on this section here: https://app.milanote.com/1FjKKO16uYDY9I/information-science


- Understand the basic composition of information.

- Learn how we measure information.

- Follow up on the details of how information entropy works

- Discover the ramifications of information entropy limitations.

11 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

0cde9f No.172

HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.


As the entropy of an information source becomes more predictable, the ability to represent the information it generates in a smaller message space increases.

If the entropy of an information sources becomes less predictable, the ability to represent the information it generates in a smaller message space decreases.

This means that if an information source puts our less information while its numbers of observers increases, this is because its entropy has become more predictable, allowing it to send out coherent messages involving fewer symbols.

This behavior helps categorize the social efficiency of a communicative being.

0cde9f No.173

HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.


As messages achieve maximum compressibility based on the entropic bias of their source, external noise can significantly interfere with the decompressed message. Adding parity bits for each segment of symbols helps the receiver understand what to expect from a collection of symbols.

DNA error correction after mitosis performs a similar and much more robust version of this expectation confirmation. In theory, neurons should be performing a similar task regarding symbol management.

An interesting side effect of this concept allows you to measure the what kinds of noise environments an information source has been biased to survive in. As noise increases, more resources must be allocated to creating and confirming parity. High parity to confirm a message means the information source has been designed to communicate in a very chaotic and very noisy environment. DNA is an example of a communication methodology designed to ensure highly chaotic environments.

0cde9f No.174

HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.


Recall that, in quantum mechanics, information is the state of some vector (atom, photon, etc) The particle has a state and to measure it, you have to fire a photon at it. The state of the photon is altered by the state of the particle. You extract the state of the particle by inferring how it altered the state of the photon.

We know we can derive information about the state of a particle, but can we destroy information? Meaning, if we disassemble the way the atoms of an element are arranged, did we destroy the information of that element? No. The information is still exists. In order to preserve reversibility, information cannot be destroyed.

So not only does information carry the structural bias of its source, but when we apply this entropic property upon particles, we conclude that the structural bias can never be destroyed as well.

POSTULATE: Because of the uncertainty principle, every particle in the universe has at least maximum information entropy as its lowest possible entropy. Meaning, the observed state of one particle has the same chance of occurring as any other observed state. This tells us something about the structural bias of the particle. From a cryptographic analysis, every particle in the universe is a highly secretive agent that is intentionally hiding itself from everything else. If this postulate is true, it may be because any biasing that favors one state over another may result in the destabilization of the information that makes up the particle.

0cde9f No.188

HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.


The last video introduced the idea of information conservation. This video talks explains how information is conserved even in the most seemingly destructive of scenarios: entry into a black hole.

As we've learned, information carries the structural bias of its source, within both the discrete impulses themselves and within the flow of those impulses. If information can be destroyed, then we have to throw out everything that depends upon the third law of thermodynamics. Because of these repercussions, there is tremendous amount of pressure to preserve mathematics as is and find a way to ensure that information cannot be destroyed in scenarios such as blackholes.

This leads us to two outcomes: information cannot be destroyed because it is either hidden or preserved. There are known problems for hiding local information explained in the No-Hiding theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hidingtheorem) but there are clever but incomplete workarounds to that, including Pilot Wave theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot

wave_theory) and the Fecund Universe postulate. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Smolin#Fecund_universes)

This brings us to one of the more complete conclusion: information is preserved, even in a black hole. As information is added to a black hole, it grows in diameter. Because of time dilation effects of a black hole, as matter falls into it, the frame of reference shifts for the matter and outsiders witness the matter slowing down until it stops completely. In essence, the information about the matter becomes “encoded” onto the surface of the blackhole while the matter continues to fall into the blackhole. This means that when a black hole radiates away its energy, the energy can carry away the information on the surface of the black hole as well, and thus, presPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Post last edited at

0cde9f No.211

HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.


Holograms encode 3D information into 2D information in a lossy manner. If you add one bit of information into to a black hole, the surface of the black hole grows by one square Planck unit. This exposes a strangeness about the black hole.

If you take a box and fill it with objects, the capacity of how many objects the box can hold can be measured in advance by multiplying the length, width, and height of the box. However, when dealing with how much information a black hole can hold, you don't measure the volume of the black hole. Instead, you measure the diameter. This means the information capacity of a black hole is determined by its surface area, not its volume. This would be like saying the physical capacity of the box is based on the writing on the outside of the box.

This means all 3D information within a black hole is encoded onto its 2D surface/hologram.

The holographic principle is a mathematical model of convenience. In translating a 3D universe into a 3D hologram, the concept of gravity goes away, which helps isolate the behavior of gravity via comparison.

c4464a No.111[Reply]

THE GAP - New Emotion - The emotional perception of the Gap between two contrary positions, as prerequisite for gnosis. A feeling of cariousness and precipitousnss, a yawning abyss.

Felt when ideas conflict, and paradox may invoke this emotion. When one cognitive system is juxtaposed against another, this may lead to a vertigous emotion of openness AND emptiness, of promise and of peril - offering fulfillment through the necessary resolution: Either folding into one side or the other, or the true Solution: the development of a Third Position - that of memetic framework awareness.

782f54 No.114


This is a gnostic void for a lot of people

0ded9c No.207


Fold Mind and Emotion onto each other, access the inner body.

Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / acme / animu / arepa / ecopol / hispint / sunny / tacos / vichan ]