Fuck Yeah, Monarchy!

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 2 per post.

File: 1432954405147.png (33.21 KB, 233x264, 233:264, 1375376949898.png)

Fuck Yeah, Monarchy! ☻ 05/30/15 (Sat) 02:53:25 No.140

I'm an absolute monarchist who wants a divine illuminated king to rule his nation and keep it white and right.

I like that video John Alan Martinson did about monarchy. It was like over an hour long but gave the perfect case for why we should have monarchy in great detail and was worth listening through the whole thing.

Unfortunately the channel that hosted it, HumansOpposingJewz, has been wiped out from youtube completely without a trace of it having ever even existed before (not "channel was shutdown for violating rules blah blah") and pretty much every single video by John Alan Martinson that was up on youtube has been purged.

Anyone have that vid?

Iliyrioi the Unrustleable 05/30/15 (Sat) 10:16:09 No.144

I haven't got the vid, but why are you a monarchist?

☻ 05/30/15 (Sat) 21:46:16 No.160

>>144

An absolute monarchy is the best form of government for realizing the 14 words, exterminating all the niggers, and avoiding the mass man's retard vote.

Anonymous 05/30/15 (Sat) 22:01:57 No.161

I'm for the Semi-Constitutional Monarchy like in Germany.

Illiyrioi!!q3gjb.UXpQ 06/02/15 (Tue) 21:07:59 No.169

>>160

You're a real human bean and a real hero.

Anonymous 06/02/15 (Tue) 23:01:45 No.175

I'm sorry, Smiley, but it will be a goddess that will set things right and white.

Anonymous 06/03/15 (Wed) 00:15:47 No.182

File: 1433290547743.jpg (131.61 KB, 944x686, 472:343, sjbarnesy.jpg)

Smiley? On /monarchy/? Fuck yes.

Anonymous 06/04/15 (Thu) 16:43:29 No.202

File: 1433436209371.jpg (204.89 KB, 1048x1487, 1048:1487, 1413415544971.jpg)

>>175

>but it will be a goddess that will set things right and white.

Will it be this one?

Anonymous 06/06/15 (Sat) 11:31:50 No.215

>>140

>>160

Why do you think than the king would want to keep the nation white? He is not forced to have the same opinions than you and may want more people under his rule.

If he is some kind of free border freak, will you still support him or are you going to fight back?

You can be sure of something: if a king does not want his country to be economically and technologically weak against the jew corporatists countries like ours, he will have to keep most aspects of the modern economy, especially usury.

And you can also be sure that a king will have to deal with politics, unless some kind of stalinist purges are at work all the time. He simply won't have the opportunity to "kill all niggers", even if, and it is unlikely, he wanted to.

>>202

Rise and shine my girl.

Anonymous 07/17/15 (Fri) 00:57:10 No.238

>>215

The cool thing about free borders is that you can see the effects in a single lifetime. The monarch would also find his expenses growing ludicrously if he maintained open borders with all the appropriate attractors (welfare, legal representation, public infrastructure).

I'm also not seeing how usury is needed to generate economic wealth. Usury as it functions now provides literally zero economic benefit to anyone, unless they are a central banker. Money being merely a measure of value means that ceteris perebus, one nation printing and charging interest and another nation printing and charging no interest would see no difference overall economic value. In fact, the nation that does not charge interest will not see bubbles forming everywhere like some kind of sick economic abomination, meaning that overall they will see more correctly allocated resources.

In terms of raw cash, they will be poorer, but in terms of raw value, they would be better off.

Anonymous 07/19/15 (Sun) 19:41:03 No.239

>>160

you mean… fascism.

Anonymous 07/23/15 (Thu) 22:11:34 No.248

File: 1437689494753.png (234.54 KB, 460x599, 460:599, esp-coat-of-arms.png)

>>239

But fascism doesn't work, anon. There is nothing new in it. It comes from classic conservative monarchism, and the only difference is that some support socialism/ republicanism. It is only implemented when a nation is in trouble.