>>3754
>You have semicolons, colons and incorrecrly used commas.
His punctuation is correct. Please, show me ONE instance of his "incorrect use of punctuation".
>The writing style could not be more pretentious.
How is his writing style pretentious?
>And it's completely garbage. "The linguistic progression of a concept?" The linear progression? Temporal progression?
It's pretty self-explanatory. The progression of a concept in language...
>What if concepts dont progress?
But they do.
>Its assumptions based on vague definitions
What assumptions?
What "vague definitions"?
>written IN ALL FUCKING CAPS
And?
You just seem frustrated and mad at not being able to understand.