[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ random / dislyte / farabs / fio / liberty / lit / lumidor / s8s / x ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload4 per post.


Please report any posts you feel may break the rules.

File: 432f7d9fd51d470⋯.png (1.94 MB,1920x1080,16:9,Ivan_Drago_Individual.png)

725ea0 No.13659763

Reproductive skew is basically the 1% vs. the 99% of the dating and gene pool.

Instead of everyone getting an equal shot at passing on their DNA, a tiny, gatekeeping elite monopolizes all the mating, while everyone else gets completely locked out.

How It Works in Nature (And Why Animals Don't Stand for It)

Evolutionary biologists and primatologists like Frans de Waal have documented this across the animal kingdom for decades, from baboons to gorillas. High reproductive skew happens when one dominant individual or power couple uses sheer aggression, gatekeeping, and stress tactics to block every subordinate in the group from hooking up or having kids.

* High skew: One top dog has 95% of the kids. Everybody else gets zero.

* Low skew: Reproduction is spread out fairly evenly across the group.

Here is the catch, though: animals actually overthrow their gatekeepers. Field researchers studying wild primate troops have repeatedly filmed what happens when an alpha gets too greedy and polices the group's sex life too hard. The locked out subordinates form coalitions, jump the alpha, and break the monopoly so everyone gets a chance again.

Why It Applies to Overthrowing the Puritans

Anthropologists and historians studying human societies point out that human puritans, whether religious zealots, rigid moralizers, or gatekeeping elites, manufacture artificial reproductive skew using shame, strict laws, and social policing instead of physical muscle.

By controlling who is allowed to date, marry, or express their sexuality, puritanical systems dictate whose values and lineages get passed to the next generation while suppressing everyone else. Major demographic shifts throughout history, from the collapse of strict Victorian norms to the sexual revolution of the 1960s, prove that young generations eventually reject top down moral policing once they realize it is a rigged game.

Understanding reproductive skew reveals the biological playbook behind moral policing. Evolutionary psychology shows it is rarely about actual purity. It is almost always about gatekeeping who gets to thrive, reproduce, and shape the future. Just like in primate troops, those systems only survive as long as the majority lets a tiny minority police their biology.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fe75c1 No.13659764

Hypergamy doesn't exist.

I'll explain it in two different skews, which is Earth and Heaven, and we'll just discourse apart from the latter, since that was a regal problem.

1% vs 99% of the dating and gene pool. We have two girls (laborers) and one woman (inevitability). We only seek to raise one because it is a DAUGHTER. So did he dig it up?

Evolutionary biologists, particularly the homosexual evolutionist that's most world famous points to primates and apes because evolutionary cousins, not that we agree with history because it changes, but it points to a very particular bias, that of history and actual evolution. That's without actual biological material and behavior science, which precludes the prior.

One top dog has 95% of the kids? Guanine is a homogenous buffer to evolution, and I dissect it entirely (outside of the deficit ceiling and fraternizing), no one can lend children. They are fed by the third generation for any human being on earth up to royalty, and money does not possess alleles whatsoever.

I don't really agree with strict laws.

The scales of the laws belonged to the woman, so that would have been the idea of the metaphor. A good one. It's just not reaching practice.

Evolution is necessary because children must survive. It is the ongoing maintenance of an organism and life that must continue, and so that is the fiscal connivance of focus on the continuance, a continuity that proceeds infinite times into the future.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

960620 No.13659794

File: 889c50b5e8a1960⋯.jpg (3.54 MB,5700x9300,19:31,incel1.jpg)

File: efa3b1cd476fe24⋯.jpg (2.39 MB,3350x9350,67:187,incel4.jpg)

File: 88a4142f43d9928⋯.jpg (3.49 MB,3000x9900,10:33,incel2.jpg)

File: 70ea325ac027a8f⋯.jpg (3.25 MB,3000x9900,10:33,incel3.jpg)

>>13659763

creepy incels need psych treatment whew lad

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ random / dislyte / farabs / fio / liberty / lit / lumidor / s8s / x ]