/asatru/ - Asatru / Heathenry / Paganism

No since Slavic paganism has a different pantheon of God's than Nordic paganism

>>1096

And just why can't we talk about Slavic Paganism?

The two beliefs are similar. Are slavs "not white"?

>>5626

Slav here, I definitely agree. I think that we should try Russia's idea of Pan-Slavisim

There is no such thing as "slavs". History doesn't mention them before the byzantine empire. This is because the people that founded Kievan Rus (named after the Rus tribe) were literally northern germanic vikings. Before that, the eastern germanics settling in the area were literally using runes and had the same pantheon as the other germanic peoples throughout the continent.

"Slav" was the church term for any non-christian peoples living outside the boundaries of the orthodox byzantine empire.

There never were any "slavs", and there never will be.

>>5639

These optical "genetic differences" are caused by the various baltid influences of the eastern baltic race, which a majority of russians stem from. There's also a considerable amount of asian blood to be found due to the centuries-long mongol occupation of Russia.

There is no "slavic race" as such however, this is delusional propaganda. The word "slav" didn't come into regular use until the 15th century or so.

>>5640

Nice projection and ad hominem spergery in lieu of any genuine coherent counter-argument there, pan-slavist faggot.

You're either a troll or incredibly retarded.

>>5639

I would also point out, of course, that strictly speaking "germanic" isn't a race either.

If some nigger speaks a western germanic language such as english, he's still a nigger.

Likewise, if someone of nordic extraction with a cultural germanic background speaks russian, he will stay nordic (ie germanic) in nature nonetheless.

This is how the "slavification" of various eastern germanic tribes through the forced use of eastern orthodox church slavonic/glagolitic during the middle ages is being misinterpreted and deliberately misrepresented nowadays to sow animosities between europeans who would otherwise be united.

Read this book here, it's a very good introduction into the racial elements of the greater white race (note the absence of "slavs" in the contents of this book):

http://www.theapricity.com/earlson/reeh/

… It also disproves any kind of delusional fictional notions of a "slavic race" peddled by pan-slavist supremacists who use this argumentation to fight the nordic race.

>It's fine you also consider the genetics, that is absolutely necessary, but COMPLETELY disregarding linguistics and culture is simply retarded.

Except i'm not doing this anywhere. Nice strawman/try though.

I'm just pointing out the fact that from a historical POV, "slavic" people are a relatively modern invention. The notion of a "slavic" people itself as such didn't really take off up until 200-300 years or so ago either, when the poles started pushing westward to un-germanize eastern germanic areas on the outer edges of Silesia and so on.

I know this because many of my own relatives lived there until 1945, when the final result of pan-slavist imperialist anti-germanic amibitions resulted in the expulsion and deaths of tens of millions of germans.

If you actually support this kind of faggotry, you should consider killing yourself.

>>5648

>If you actually support this kind of faggotry, you should consider killing yourself.

Haha, says the hooked nose kike trying to say that my race doesn't exist.

I'm now declaring that "Norse" people don't exist because there are similarities between Scandinavians and Germans. Why? Well, cause there's similarities between Balts and Poles, and obviously there's no Slavic race, so that must mean there's no Norse race.

Here's a map that proves that Scandinavians and Brits don't exist