/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

>>1049204

Ok this is starting to get interesting.

>>1049204

This kinda disappoints me. To be the creatures that killed them all they sure are easy to scare.

I liked more my hypotesis of them being demons and satan just backstabbing them to breed the monsters for his own purposes.

Oh man, comic is getting good

>>1049514

You're half-right. This is Jim Hanks', Tom Hanks' brother's, voice work. Jim also voices Woody in all video game and commercial performances.

>>1047891

capitalism

>>1050013

People who are family members tend to look like each other, who knew?

>>1049863

Disney streaming service seems likely since they got to make up the money for what they invested and what Star Wars has lost them.

>>1049868

Speaking of plummeting profits and wasted money…

http://archive.is/bikju

>>1049870

I thought Rose' actress quit acting or something. Why would she return?

>>1031504

>Karen is an even worse person in the show than in the comics

How? I'm not very up to date.

>>1050016

Karen in the comics was a whore who lost herself to drugs and sold out Matt because of it. Karen in the show was in a small town dating a douchebag drug dealer then ended up getting her brother killed in a car accident after an altercation with her boyfriend.

So why exactly is this considered garbage?

>>1049996

No idea, the guy must be crazy. I think it looks fun, I'll download the movie and watch it later today. Will review it afterwards.

>>1049996

Shilling is shilling especially after the op spammed threads in the past.

Alright, I'm back. The movie was ok. Had some really nice sound effects in certain parts, good animation at times too. I think it could have benefitted from more frames of animation in some slower parts. The movie features very cleverly disguised 3D animation in scenes where they could get away with it, with one exeption. Soundtrack fits the movie at least. Some out of place anti-nazi imagery (a nazi with a pet cobra lives next to the main character, and some luchadores punching Hitler in one scene), but I shouldn't be surprised, it's written by a frenchman after all. The movie sticks to one style for the most part. The english voices lack a little something, but the first conversation between Angelino (the black round one) and Vinz (inferno cop's midget cousin) is really good and sounded very natural at first. Luna, the girl, however, was really weak.

It's a decent flick, and the animation is alright. The move is based on the comic by the same name, and the writer was major part of the movie. Honestly, I had hoped for more crazy stuff. Grab some friends and some light snack, and the movie will fill in about one and a half hour of your time. I mean, it's right there, so no need to pay for anything.

>>1049844

Its shit

>>1049844

Imagine if you took a 90s arcade beat-em-up game, drew it really badly, and then you pozzed the fuck out of it.

>>1049545

>Fake lore shows

They don't make shows that are relevant to an everyday life issue? Almost like a PSA sort of thing?

>>1049623

>>1049582

>>1049632

I. M. Weasel?

>>1049876

That's right.

>>1049890

From where are the PKNA comics? Are they seperate issues from the large books? I know someone who really wants to read them.

>>1041120

>>1049890

Thank you for remind me that I need to finish reading it.

>>1049922

>Are they seperate issues from the large books?

Yes. PKNA and the sequel PK2 were published separately in their on books, with the third series (fourth if you take into account the unanimously hated reboot) PKNE it was published on the Topolino magazine.

>>1049922

Fan translations of all issues can be downloaded from here:

http://bankingtheduck.blogspot.com/p/download-links.html

>>1049936

Thanks.

boring

Don't let them get you down OP, I thought the comic was sweet.

>Started June 2017

Jesus that is not a fucking good sign that it only has under 100 pages done. Meanwhile they only cock tease you with the actual plot and backstory, we don't even know what those weird lizard people are called that seem to make up half of the village.

Looks nice but makes me wish I was reading Unsounded or any other well directed comic.

>goats

>moms

>shota

is this undertale ?

>>1049950

Motivation is a cold bitch.

>>1049686

Because Nickelodeon is just Viacom, and Viacom is fucking garbage.

>>1049914

>course, pissed off all the fedora-tippers who felt they'd been cheated.

>Biggest consumers of family entertainment are religious people

>Making entertainment for them is bad because?

>>1049686

Malala was 15 when she got shot - why does she look 50 years old in the last two panels?

>>1049914

I'd agree if it weren't a streaming service, because streaming services are cancer, and hopefully I don't need to explain why.

>>1049945

because she's middle eastern.

>>1049412

>Why are super hero comics with overpowered heroes with no real personality besides "I'm good." so interesting to you? If you don't have gritty realism to some extent it just turns into media made for kids.There is a sweet spot between gritty realism and babified bullshit.

Pretty much this.

I've found the best stories at least attempt to make an honest attempt to answer the question "If we change this variable, what would be the implications and logical conclusions?"

Most comics don't even attempt that in favor of just being "The hero is the one who agrees with all of the author's views, and everyone else is an I AM SILLY MSPaint comic."

>>1049849

>That's some mainstream media tier line of questioning right fuckin there

It's not because the main stream never uses such tactics.

>We're rehashing this argument after I destroyed you on it?

You didn't destroy shit you took it all over the place until it dropped off.

>The philosophical questions are the conflict though. The question is "Who was right to do what they did?"

But by the end of the book it's confirmed Adrian gets cucked. Both Manhattan tells him that he'll eventually fail and that his plot will get leaked.

>There's multiple different ways to interpret each character's motivations, and each character walks away with a completely different take away at the end.

There are multiple ways to put it but at the end most things stay the same.

Adrian hasn't changed his view.

Laurie and Dan both are still the average humans who don't know how to take anything in.

Rosarch dies for his beliefs.

Nothing of change in most of them besides Manhattan .

>The book never definitively states what is the right course of action, it just poses a moral question and then takes it to the logical conclusion while never resolving which character is definitively or morally right.

Adrian still fails at the end of the book even if we don't see what happens next. Manhattans last words to him straight up tell him in the long run his work will fail. The pay off is just never shown until Doomsday Clock where they literally have to travel universes because the old one became even more asshurt after finding out about Adrian and nuked themselves. Pretty strong answer to a question to me.

>My question was very specific. I asked you to clarify what parts of watchmen was bad. You didn't answer. You said and I quote: "I'm deliberately trying to make things short here" and then followed it up with a "it's easy to poke holes until it collapses wouldn't you agree?" but given your previPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1049883

Doomsday Clock isn't canon.

>>1049883

>It's not because the main stream never uses such tactics.

The tactic of asking inflammatory, off topic question that paint the person you're questioning as a terrible extremist? They use it all the fuckin time. The only time you've asked me a question outside of these stupid, pointless questions is when I asked YOU to clarify your points, to expand upon them, and to actually list your grievances.

>You didn't destroy shit you took it all over the place until it dropped off.

No, I pretty much destroyed it. It's not my fault you refuse to actually discuss the comic or even stay on topic. You keep latching onto tangential points of mine. It's a pretty dumb tactic. You say something, I say something to refute it, you latch onto the most retarded detail and then I refute that and it's an endless cycle because you can't debate worth a shit.

>but at the end most things stay the same.

Objectively, they don't.

>Nothing of change in most of them besides Manhattan.

Except their entire relationship, their worldview, and the implications of how they exist after the event. You're one of those people that want the Watchmen to wrap up in this nice little unambiguous bow, but you want it to AGREE with you. You want all the character to shift over to your viewpoint or the character you identify most, and the fact that everyone has a completely different way of justifying what happened pisses you off.

>Manhattans last words to him straight up tell him in the long run his work will fail.

Which is a common interpretation, but not a wholly canon one. Manhattan's statement is ambiguous. "Nothing never ends" is a general statement. How you take it entirely depends on your world view.

>The pay off is just never shown until Doomsday Clock where they literally have to travel universes because the old one became even more asshurt after finding out about Adrian and nuked themselves. Pretty strong answer to a question to me.

If Moore didn't write it, it's not canon.

>>1049935

>The tactic of asking inflammatory, off topic question that paint the person you're questioning as a terrible extremist?

Where have they? Even then you could just say "No."

>No, I pretty much destroyed it. It's not my fault you refuse to actually discuss the comic or even stay on topic. You keep latching onto tangential points of mine. It's a pretty dumb tactic. You say something, I say something to refute it, you latch onto the most retarded detail and then I refute that and it's an endless cycle because you can't debate worth a shit.

>No u

>Tells me I can't debate for shit when I told him 5 posts ago.

I know you have low standards for everything but come on buddy.

>Objectively they don't.

>Doesn't refute my listed points.

Okay buddy. Master debate artist here clearly.

But I'm the one deflecting. Okay.

>Except their entire relationship, their worldview, and the implications of how they exist after the event.

Not from what I can tell. The philosophic characters never changed and Dan and Jew Woman never have concrete enough beliefs to change.

>You're one of those people that want the Watchmen to wrap up in this nice little unambiguous bow, but you want it to AGREE with you.

Fantastic assumption but Moore did tie it up in a unambiguous bow.

>You want all the character to shift over to your viewpoint or the character you identify most,

Do you honestly fucking think that if I were that invested in Watchmen I'd be shitting on it this entire thread? You're entering Freud and Jung tier levels of Psychoanalysis bullshit now. You best stop before you make yourself look like an even bigger baboon.

>And the fact that everyone has a completely different way of justifying what happened pisses you off.

Anon's can you tell me how your views on WatchmePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1049618

Says fucking who?

>>1049578

> the merchant at the start of the first movie knows what tupperware is

That is also the genie you dummy. He's voiced by Robin Williams and has four fingers on his hands. Obviously the writers just had the genie break the fourth wall, and 10,000 years was either just hyperbole or it's a typical fantasy world with permanent medieval stagnation or it's a cartoon and has anarchronisms for jokes just like Hercules.

>>1049746

yes

>>1049746

He starred in several well-liked movies over his life, and remakes are big now. Look forward to a new Hook.

>>1049743

>dat Elmer Fudd reference

Surprised they actually animated that.

>>1049560

>you will never fuck patti on her mother's grave

>>1045863

Was he a jew?

>>1049768

It was originally Nickelodean, so it would be no surprise.

>>1040402

>It's like saying a protestant and a catholic have the same religion. It's obviously not true.

>the salty Protestant

>>1040357

>Buddhists and other Oriental believers don't see humans as "defective."

I never said they did.

>Well, Shintoism isn't about "escaping the world."

Shinto is only one step above animism; it’s not a moral philosophy in the same sense as Buddhism is. Buddhism and Shinto overlap so much in Japan because they’re not mutually exclusive belief systems.

>Like I said, the Buddha is there to teach. Not to redeem.

I never said otherwise. Buddhism says that personal effort is the only way to end suffering (unless you want to bring Bodhisattvas into the equation, which blurs the lines a bit).

Since this thread now more or less is an Avatar General, I'll say that I wish there was more attention placed on how notable spirits handle the Avatar's duty. Escape from the Spirit Realm says Koh stole Kuruk's fiance's face to punish him for failing his duty as Avatar. LoK had an arc about spirits and how they interact with humans yet we didn't really see how spirits treated with Korra as someone in part a spiritual entity who should have significance in the spirit's world. Indeed, Korra's role didn't really have the significance there you expect it to have (being more of a vigilante than a properly sacred figure).

bump

>>1040680

If they ever touch this franchise again I want everything korra retconned, korra spirits are huge unrepentant assholes. They're invaders from another dimension who killed and tortured humans because we eat meat and don't treat nature like they want us to (even though it's OUR nature and they can fuck off back to their dimension).

But the height of their bullshit is when they get all smug after shitting up human cities with their spirit bullshit and leave because humanity is too evil and we war too much and now we have spirit nukes.

Obviously we need avatar:doom where we invade the spirit world and wreck spirit cunt ass with spirit nukes and spirit lasers, then avatar can truly die.

So i ignored this show until I checked out a little bit of this thread 2 days ago, after binging the whole thing here are my thoughts:

I saw a lot of avatar names in the credits and I think it contributed to it being a competent project, it never truly reached amazing but it shows that they know what it takes to put together a functional show. /co/ might disagree but I felt the same way about the dragon prince though I'd say it was significantly worse than this it was still within the realm of avg. Shows should all reach at least the competency of these offerings.

The pacing and the filler was insane, I could never understand why they chose to pace the show the way the did. You get this HUGE cliffhanger or important reveal and then the next episode will completely drop it and there will be a deflated resolution a few episodes later. The D&D filler episode was pure pain for me, I could not give less of a fuck. I feel that filler should emulate tales of ba sing se, a high point of the show that explores showcases what makes the characters great.

The shiro-clone-possession-voltron soul storage thing was retarded nonsense, there was nothing I liked about it and was incredibly glad it was over.

There was no real romance, considering how bad team avatar is at that, I kind of appreciate it but the characters come off as non-sexual entities and the only one who gets married is the homo for diversity points and you never get to see pidge in a dress (outside of the past).

The characters aren't shallow but they aren't that deep, most of their interaction is over the plot and they don't have the same chemistry as the gaang did I'm guessing this was a natural consequence of the HUGE ensemble cast. As far as huge casts go this was the best handled I have ever watched, but it shows the unavoidable problem of not being able to delve to deep into character relations when the story is flooded with them. I think keith lampshades the character problem when he says they're not really friends they're just brought together by the war etc, he's not that far from the truth to be honest.

Lots Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1046602

Pidge is a reverse trap, jackass

>>1047524

Would be better as a straight trap.

>>1047527

fag

>>1046427

Ultimate Aryan Fetish

>>1048873

When Brie Larson's CAPT MARVEL fails hard.

>>1048862

First post best post.

>>1048863

This.

>>1048849

>Chelsea Handler

>Patton Oswaltd

>Two faggots who's most notable projects are Blades of Glory and Cavemen TV show.

So it is guaranteed to be shit. Kevin Smith's project sounds the least bad, which is quite an accomplishment.

Besides, didn't Oswalt and Handler have some sort of deal with Netflix? Netflix might actually go down if people more people will lose/end deals and all studios get their own streaming services.

>>1049073

I heard Oswalt was supposed to be on the new MST3K.

Did people actually like Hit Monkey?