[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / cyoa / general / leftpol / newbrit / tingles / vg ]

/fur/ - Furry

all fur one and one fur all

Catalog   Archive

Winner of the 58rd Attention-Hungry Games
/8diamonds/ - Death can be a merciful thing

October 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
Verification *
File *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


►►► Get Whitelisted | Rules | Catalog | Log ◄◄◄

| Find & Share | Art | Edit | Literature | Porn |

File: b9ad3ac96d105b0⋯.jpg (112.98 KB, 1023x570, 341:190, 1459183175741-2.jpg)

 No.25183[Reply]

Discussion on new rule below

Welcome to 8chan's board for furry related discussion and content.

The idea here is to foster discussion and content creation as we share our interests. In contrast most furry communities tend to prioritize being porn dumps.

If others are a porn boards with discussion, /fur/ is a discussion board with porn.

If you're interested in porn dumps or a fetish thread without close relation to furry, take a look at our sub-board >>>/fp/

(Static pages aren't working right now so the rules are written out here)

//---------------------------------//

Rules:

1. No excessive, irredeemable shitposting or derailment

1.b. Leave real life politics at the door

2. Don't make excessive dump threads, particularly for porn; this isn't e621

3. Porn/fetishes stick to a handful of threads. >>>/fp/ is for added specificity

4. Keep trip/name/avatarfagging to a minimum if you have no reason to do it.

5. No doxxing and no calling for raids and personal armies.

6. Keep original post images relatively tame. Explicit imagery may be spoilered. (keeps the catalog somewhat tasteful)

Etiquette:

1. Use the catalog

2. If you're thinking of making a porn dump do so on /fp/ or use the gfur or sfur general instead

3. Unless there is good reason, make threads for a series rather than a specific character. Doing so only for porn is not such a reason.

4. Try putting some effort into the start of your thread to spur discussion

5. Spoiler images others may find uncomfortable in threads where they aren't expected.

Modus OperandiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

619 posts and 105 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

 No.87065

Can we get a ban or at least a warning on that Darkshadowfox idiot?

Content of his posts aside, he's violating Rule 4 all the time, usually posts with shitty reddit-esque formatting, and double/triple/quadruple posts with frequency. Example: in >>82959 thread, he is posts

>>87031

>>87033

>>87034

>>87035

>>87036

>>87037

all in a row.




File: 4aa5594252ac211⋯.jpg (16.88 KB, 260x260, 1:1, sadnate.jpg)

 No.22069[Reply]

https://yiff.party

AUTHORIZATION LINK:

>> https://yiff.party/zauth <<

If you get a sadnate.jpg, make sure that:

1) Your browser isn't blocking third party referrers

2) You are left-clicking the link and not right/shift-clicking

3) The URL you are viewing this thread (and clicking the link) from is one of the following:

http://8ch.net/fur/res/22069.html

https://8ch.net/fur/res/22069.html

http://sys.8ch.net/mod.php?/fur/res/22069.html

https://sys.8ch.net/mod.php?/fur/res/22069.html

http://oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/fur/res/22069.html

If you're still having trouble, go to https://yiff.party/ref and post what you see there here.

445 posts and 73 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

 No.88212

File: 7a5f351e4e5ac4a⋯.png (144.56 KB, 1332x273, 444:91, IcpthuD.png)

>half of the most wanted updates are 3d roastie "cosplayers"

normalfag purge when


 No.88244

I noticed that LoZ got updated, if that was someone here then thank you.

>>88212

Never, apparently. Shit's probably gotten so out of hand that it'd be next to impossible to get rid of all of the 3DPD and I don't even know if there are people looking into who's getting added anymore, or if that ever really happened at all.


 No.88273

I'd donate if shit actually got updated and there was a 3dpd ban; but I'm getting tired of this shit. why'd this site have to open to normies


 No.88275

>>88273

It's inevitable with anything good. Normies come and corrupt it. Even if you purged it and restarted, it'd just happen all over again.


 No.88308

No way anyone can add artdecademonthly's work? Isn't active on Patreon anymore, but can't the content from his personal site be added to the Shared Files?




File: 75b0d683dd462e0⋯.jpg (42.64 KB, 705x397, 705:397, DneONISUcAARBsi.jpg)

 No.82863[Reply]

Hellooooo nurse.

The Spyro devs know their target audience (because noone else would give a crap).

25 posts and 30 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88256

>>82871

why is everyone fapping to this??? shes hideous


 No.88276

>>88234

you too


 No.88284

>>88234

Man this artist cannot into faces or anatomy


 No.88290

>>88284

B-b-but the GIANT BALLOON TITS!!


 No.88307

>>88290

You're right, they're literal baloon tits.

Even i can draw tits larger and more realistic than that.




File: 42631ced8842b03⋯.jpg (203.45 KB, 1607x2048, 1607:2048, DfdvloqVQAAlgGM.jpg large.jpg)

File: 74458ab3cdb10ab⋯.png (1.36 MB, 850x1199, 850:1199, Dd9hW8LU0AAgITM.png)

File: 5700ea4d461a1f2⋯.png (156.66 KB, 690x850, 69:85, 1f88f3c2c458f9e16eb07395f3….png)

File: 51ebccca0c64687⋯.png (409.09 KB, 628x800, 157:200, 57f20e2506460c28c7018c651d….png)

 No.80554[Reply]

Gcub / kemoshota thread

Last thread

>>53078

32 posts and 54 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.85260

>>82021

they are popular because they are good dumbass


 No.85283

>>85260

Well, they're popular because people like what they draw, whether it's style, subject matter, or both.


 No.88220

File: 4ad5a27c8177c66⋯.jpg (91.78 KB, 800x800, 1:1, presenting.jpg)

>tfw you'll never be a cute cub who gets molested by your neighbor

life is suffering.


 No.88298

File: afbe1cd420f50e0⋯.jpg (2.34 MB, 2489x3696, 2489:3696, eb9ca762cd17.jpg)

>>88220

>TFW I used to be that neighbor who did the molesting, but that was decades ago

All lives suffer, but some are more insufferable than others.


 No.88306

>>88298

>Molesting actual kids

Leave this life please




File: b362e13efe75c5d⋯.jpg (53.19 KB, 800x800, 1:1, 617887823a07f26d3832833817….jpg)

File: 926ba53422ed09e⋯.jpg (71.92 KB, 800x800, 1:1, e8848e1830c7afb6470f7956c6….jpg)

File: bebc86f4d5dab77⋯.jpg (76.22 KB, 597x800, 597:800, 53a5328ae60df393833cbfda61….jpg)

 No.67150[Reply]

<pics from marblesoda

66 posts and 77 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88231

>>88230

There's more but if you want it you gotta pay me $20 on PayPal


 No.88239

>>88230

so apparently Apis read this thread and unlocked his recent porn

You can download most of what he has now

I was just joking around but hey, sometimes things work out like that I guess

I mean, why would I charge you if I was posting his other recent work for free? Lol

Enjoy dude


 No.88240

If the guy goes full insecure nuclear again, most of his art if not everything can be found here https://tbib.org/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=apis


 No.88241

File: f658485ec3c1c86⋯.jpg (160.57 KB, 850x613, 850:613, sample_212ad0e144e7b6fa7e1….jpg)

>>88240

I love how this is just a big middle finger to everything he did, thanks anon, you're a God


 No.88297

>>88221

>he should've drawn under a different name

Wouldn't matter. His work is so distinctive it may as well have a signature.




File: 10085c12dccdaed⋯.jpeg (53.48 KB, 650x360, 65:36, pokemon-detective-pikachu….jpeg)

 No.87898[Reply]

i want to fuck him

OH GOD I WANT TO FUCK Him WHILE HE MAKE HUMAN VOICE !!

18 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88217

>>87901

Rest of pic please?


 No.88242

File: 189f2b94e7c56fd⋯.png (8.54 KB, 698x199, 698:199, ClipboardImage.png)

Quality thread guys


 No.88247

File: 0a8445f54e6344f⋯.jpg (99.25 KB, 819x531, 91:59, now this is podracing.jpg)

>>87975

>It's whatever fucking gross, dirty texture and fur they have that makes them look gross. Not to mention their uncanny eyeballs.. This movie is truly cursed.

Yeah I really thought this was a shitty fan project too based on the pictures. Urgh they look nasty. Why can't they take more inspiration from say how the characters look in Pokken? They still have the fur texture but don't look... weird.


 No.88253

File: 0cb17e0c00f8eb0⋯.jpg (98.13 KB, 1140x646, 30:17, production_ST-feature2.jpg)

Would you watch a Pokémon movie set in the 80s where instead of CGI they'd use puppet/animatronics for the small Pokémon and costume animatronics for the large Pokémon?


 No.88296

>>88253

Probably not because I don't give a fuck about Pokemon but at least this would have looked good. There will never ever ever fucking EVER be a way to mix animated cartoons and live-action in a way that doesn't look like fucking garbage. And they're making it worse by trending away from toony (Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Space Jam sorta worked because they didn't pretend it wasn't animated) and trying to make it all muh photorealism. They think that because Disney has animated characters with six gorillion individual fur strands that this is what looks good. But an animated character only looks good in an animated world. You can't fucking change that. That's why GOOD moviemakers don't even try. That's why GOOD moviemakers don't have all-CGI characters, not built from actors in mocap suits, unless it's something completely impossible (read: is supernatural so it's okay if it looks unnatural) and then used as little as possible.

This was going to be garbage from the very onset. I didn't need to see this to know that. All you'd have to do is say "It's live-action Pokemon and all the Pokemon are 100% CGI" and I'd already know because of the above.




File: 66fb884e798af07⋯.png (8.31 MB, 1347x7438, 1347:7438, screenshot-www.tanraak.net….png)

File: 4b79f7fc1301116⋯.png (1.67 MB, 905x1280, 181:256, 4b79f7fc1301116a0a933d8310….png)

File: a0cb5da19a1a053⋯.jpg (599.84 KB, 1400x787, 1400:787, a0cb5da19a1a053d1194a49577….jpg)

File: 9e895d0df7d299d⋯.jpg (162.2 KB, 1280x819, 1280:819, 1490630269.kardie_comm.jpg)

 No.88131[Reply]

>this is what furries will defend with their money

The fact that "people" are going to claim these spots disappoints me because they don't know any better about value.

You could've spent $1000 on anything other than a piece of drawings, like sport cars or a good house.

>inb4 fuck poorfags xd

13 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88181

File: c317ca0a1200635⋯.webm (8.51 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Cultural Marxism Exposed!….webm)

>>88179

>You do far more to destroy traditional values than any communist when you commodify human relations themselves.

Careful there anon, you're sounding awfully like Frank Furtschool.


 No.88196

>>88131

It's a buyer's market. If you don't like it than don't pay for it.

I agree YCH are cancerous, but you're making some crazy stretches.

Pic 1's prices, yeah they are expensive but there's a lot of quality, but not enough to justify a minimum $350 buy-in when there are artists out there who do the same quality within the 80-150 range for their highest tier.

What would be the solution? Don't commission them. It's a buyer's market for a luxury.

Picture 2's is not as high of quality and thus lower price, the fact you're including it in your "$1000 piece of drawings" but those prices are more than reasonable.

30 euros is a good price for a full color with background picture (Extra 10 for a detailed background) and the fact they're not charging double for any extra characters is good. Just an extra $10 for detailed characters like the one displayed is a bit of a steal, especially all of the artists that'll separate detailing (I.E: Wings add $10, detailed clothing add $20, etc.) But a flat rate of just 10 these days is almost unheard of.

You also seem to think that $1000 is good enough for a sports car or a "good house" when $1000 wouldn't even be enough for a down payment on either, especially vehicles around the $42k range or a $300k house. If anything your comparison is like how a little kid would think $100 is enough to buy anything in the world.

And this isn't me saying "Fuck poorfags" but if you're not in a spot where you can afford a luxury that only gives you something pretty to look at then you shouldn't be buying into said luxury in the first place.

You complain about prices being too high but post an image where one of these artists is offering art at about $33 for a decent full color image, and arguably fair prices for complexities/other characters. I completely agree on the other images having too high of prices, but you linking that only tells me that you should focus a lot more on keeping your electricity on than paying for any luxury at all until you find a more stable job.


 No.88258

I don't buy cheap or shit art but miles-df is milking his popularity chain and people should stop buying into it.

$120 to be in a poster in the background, goodness gracious.


 No.88294

>>88196

>And this isn't me saying "Fuck poorfags", but fuck you poorfag


 No.88295

File: 18db48a6684d90d⋯.jpg (191.55 KB, 933x1624, 933:1624, 7b574ca40c9607763c246e8cc7….jpg)

>>88181

>try to prove it doesn't exist

>end up proving it

what did he mean by this?




File: 7bcafc24fb15767⋯.png (222.92 KB, 1080x823, 1080:823, IMG_20180426_020156.png)

File: 773e3c08b3c562b⋯.png (327.83 KB, 1034x916, 517:458, IMG_20180426_020330.png)

File: 5adf4d381cbe418⋯.png (875.92 KB, 1080x678, 180:113, IMG_20180426_020220.png)

File: b80dbd580ff6af3⋯.png (85.48 KB, 1080x301, 1080:301, IMG_20180426_020313.png)

File: 577721b6856b40f⋯.png (252.62 KB, 1047x1311, 349:437, IMG_20180426_020252.png)

 No.69368[Reply]

The old ones past bump limit - lets revive with fresh material

366 posts and 157 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88243

>>88192

>Do you think being a homosexual just makes them spring up inside their bodies out of thin air? Well damn.

If that was how they got STDs it'd be kinda hard to hold it against them.

Something completely out of their control like that?

Instead it's something entirely avoidable that they either refuse to do or in some cases outright chase after.

>You can't tell the difference between gays that are sluts and have lots of STDs from the ones who are monogamous and clean, and that SCARES YOU

Italics works much better for emphasis, just sayin'.

>so you decided to hate on all of them just to "be safe". It's pathetic.

How is hating on a whole group because of what the majority does surprising to you?

I mean hell, this is a fur board.

The fandom has been dealing with that exact same blanket stereotyping for years, and it happens for completely understandable reasons.

How is this fear anyway?

That's like taunting someone for being afraid to stick their hand in a variety box of pissed off snakes because only most of them are venomous and can kill.

It's not "paranoia" to avoid playing when the odds are stacked that high against you.


 No.88262

>>88243

The difference is, the gay community is vastly different now than it was in the 1970s and 1980s. It moved ahead. Your opinions stayed behind-- proudly, it would seem.


 No.88265

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>88262

Yeah, it got even more bareback-fucking aids carriers.


 No.88293

>>88237

>all but one are guaranteed

There are no guarantees. Going all "every fag has AIDS!" or "every nigger wants to kill whites!" is nothing more than paranoia. And pointless paranoia, because as said, it does not affect their lives. Ever.

>>88243

As soon as you stick your hand in a box full of gays, let me know. Otherwise your analogy is fucking garbage.

And it was NEVER a majority. That's shitty statistics. Same as the whole bit about the average homosexual having 1000 sex partners or something. Read by people who don't understand the difference between an average and a median or mode, and made worse by the people who made those statistics (with a clear agenda) and didn't bother removing outliers. Couldn't take the chance that the public wouldn't be duped when the point was to dupe them, eh?

Oh, and there's more straight people with HIV than gays. Just so you know.

>>88265

All the internet has done is shed light on those few retards among us. Or are you going to let one furfag who is an admitted zoophile speak for what you do, just because he went on public record saying he fucks dogs?


 No.88302

File: 5589efbdd878800⋯.png (117.23 KB, 851x1050, 851:1050, homoaids1430116110635.png)

File: 662fc8da6ed93bb⋯.png (162.05 KB, 1024x896, 8:7, why we should send the bla….png)

>>88237

>>88243

>>88265

Thanks for dealing with the fag(s) while I was away.

>>88192

>You can't tell the difference between gays that are sluts and have lots of STDs from the ones who are monogamous and clean

The problem is MOST gays are the sluts with like 20 different kinds of STDs for every clean monogamous one.

>and that SCARES YOU

As if that's a bad thing to be afraid of a portion of the population that carries and spreads dread diseases and likes molesting children.

>the only way a homosexual having AIDS could ever affect you is if you had sex with them or did drugs with them

There's way more than that as looking through basic medical safety and the bug chaser set have helpfully highlighted fag.

>>88293

>There are no guarantees.

That's why you always gear things in your favor "If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck" this applies to so goddamn many things (even ones that aren't conflict related) it isn't even funny.

>Going all "every fag has AIDS!" or "every nigger wants to kill whites!"

Doesn't matter if every single fag has AIDS or every nigger wants to kill whites the effects are the same.

>because as said, it does not affect their lives. Ever.

Only because they're extremely small minorities (in the case of THE GAY COMMUNITY) or minority (in the case of the Wakandans) you let these groups increase in number they will destroy everything.

>Oh, and there's more straight people with HIV than gays. Just so you Post too long. Click here to view the full text.




File: 03309ed07293584⋯.jpg (45.68 KB, 990x902, 45:41, fenfen.jpg)

 No.88277[Reply]

What are some tips for visually designing a fursona? How do you avoid making it bland and generic without making it too much of a special snowflake? Should I stick with a theme or go with a modern setting/clothes?

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88282

>>88277

Don't try to plan the while thing out and expect the first iteration to be perfect.

Start with something you like and change things over time.

You'll like it to begin with and eventually you'll adjust it until it's great.

Unless you just have shit taste at any rate.

In that case you're fucked, but you won't know until you settle on something.


 No.88285

File: 70ea65e7442e5b6⋯.png (743.21 KB, 2351x1470, 2351:1470, marxist media avatar ref.png)

literally just do what you want.

a fursona template can help though.


 No.88286

File: 2715e8ad9395371⋯.jpg (121.02 KB, 894x1280, 447:640, 05f3ba8180b684da1daa8b8b2c….jpg)

>>88281

Triggered x1000000 you shitlord

His characters are far better than yours


 No.88289

File: 5d35e365a2fb44e⋯.jpg (392.47 KB, 860x619, 860:619, df21bd9b07651e.jpg)

File: c56d3d90e1f6221⋯.jpg (340.08 KB, 700x576, 175:144, foxes.jpg)

>How do you avoid making it bland and generic without making it too much of a special snowflake?

Pick a canine, but not one of the ones everyone picks. Instead of a wolf or a fox, go with a coyote or an african wild dog or something. If it MUST be a fox, pick anything except a red fox, arctic fox, or fennec fox. Then actually use their real pelt patterns and colors instead of "generic canine with neon highlights" like everyone else does. It will stand out from the crowd, but won't look stupid. There's plenty of variety in mammals so you don't have to go with like a shark or mantis or some crazy shit. Hybrids are likely right out because it's very difficult to create something that looks like both species without resorting to cheap mix-and-match parts like shoving a raccoon tail on a fox, or rabbit ears on an otter, or a tiger pattern on what is otherwise a dog. To say nothing of how you plan on hybridizing two completely different dicks.

Any "theme" is likely to be garbage. If you have an entire universe for your OCs that is a certain genre or time period, you can keep to that style. Otherwise, don't bother. Having a steampunk character or something like that only makes you look like a pompous tryhard. Modern is fine, clothes are unimportant because most of the time they'll be off, let's be honest.

But what you're going to have to realize is that you can't make everyone happy. You will probably get more people trolling the design than praising it, because that is the world we live in. Make something YOU like, first of all, and then go from there.


 No.88292

Follow your heart and I'm sure it'll be cure :3




File: 8070f75dd6a4520⋯.jpeg (258.93 KB, 1165x1220, 233:244, file.jpeg)

File: 990277569536d96⋯.jpg (322.23 KB, 1846x1973, 1846:1973, 34__#$!@%!#__unknown.jpg)

File: eaf6c9563b6c847⋯.jpeg (574.6 KB, 1242x1735, 1242:1735, file.jpeg)

File: 188b1d5a48a4c09⋯.png (146.03 KB, 817x1100, 817:1100, file.png)

File: 8b8efb73672ca3e⋯.png (297.68 KB, 1293x940, 1293:940, file.png)

 No.83392[Reply]

Asriel preferred

188 posts and 227 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88248

File: 45556d7e7453a17⋯.jpg (71.2 KB, 938x851, 938:851, 45556d7e7453a17fa690a57dac….jpg)

File: 70b3bc0a912cd30⋯.jpg (644.82 KB, 1510x2048, 755:1024, 63369570_p0.jpg)

File: d4935a7b87595c4⋯.jpg (44.55 KB, 487x655, 487:655, 65639081_p0.jpg)

File: 514cba43e6c7bc4⋯.png (2.52 MB, 1600x1200, 4:3, 1448001919769.png)

File: c2fa2edb541dce9⋯.jpg (81.25 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, c2fa2edb541dce9454f5208b48….jpg)

>>88193

I almost vomited at just glancing at the thumbnails.

This thread needs much less of that, and more shit that doesn't make you want to gouge your eyes out with a rusted spoon.


 No.88267

File: be99358dca808b3⋯.png (252.48 KB, 500x600, 5:6, tumblr_pa6jcq6Svc1xnyjyro1….png)

File: 0aef9721b3f2680⋯.jpg (30.53 KB, 844x793, 844:793, tumblr_p71na5AuVw1wem5oao1….jpg)

File: dfcfd92b6259b45⋯.png (2.44 MB, 1280x1554, 640:777, tumblr_p82ut7w3WS1sjdp95o1….png)

File: 31c9a502b3febf7⋯.jpg (97.92 KB, 759x1051, 759:1051, tumblr_p76bcyN62D1wegq6ao1….jpg)

File: 75b27e7450ac9f8⋯.png (1.4 MB, 1209x1920, 403:640, tumblr_p62g68ClMx1sulh2uo9….png)


 No.88270

I wonder if we'll ever get to see Asriel in Deltarune.


 No.88283

>>88270

>He didn't get the peaceful ending and talk to the monsters in the castle, at which point Ralsei unmasks himself


 No.88291

File: bdf95f6b6d7b32f⋯.jpg (73.16 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, 77a77fad.jpg)

File: c70e2fbf551c91c⋯.jpg (52.57 KB, 768x768, 1:1, 3435949c.jpg)

File: 898e38fce2797a8⋯.jpg (150.17 KB, 560x722, 280:361, 145488605529.jpg)

>>88248

Nobody's impressed with your melodramatic virtue signaling, kid. I post whatever the fuck I want.




File: 5aa9c22bcd9f0a2⋯.jpg (47.41 KB, 800x800, 1:1, 8386c4f8efd6f82ae68986f889….jpg)

 No.55872[Reply]

New edit thread since the old one seems to be autosaging now

Post and request edits here

Also if anyone's willing, could they edit this pic to be completely SFW by removing the bulge between the legs? I'd really appreciate it.

356 posts and 203 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.87764

>>87711

can I get the second one but with a reptile shaft?


 No.88246

Do you guys do scat edits? If you don't, where should I go for furry scat edits?


 No.88266

>>88246

Are you talking scat removal or scat insertion? I'm no sewer worker but there may be some willing to help with the former. The latter though, you might be hard pressed to find someone willing to indulge in your shitty tastes.


 No.88268

>>88246

Scat fetishist here. Go ahead. Spoiler the image if it has scat though so it doesn't upset the normies.


 No.88280

>>88246

Okay.

Requesting a soiling edit of https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/2825125 , where poop is coming out of the character's anus. Don't make it a hyper scat though, as I don't appreciate that far.




File: 3760897a22dc1b3⋯.png (56.69 KB, 1318x375, 1318:375, jigglebones_haz_eyedeeuh.PNG)

 No.87026[Reply]

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/8930934/

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/8931736/

One of the biggest drama magnets of the past few years wants to create a new, drama-free furry site. Discuss.

133 posts and 36 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88264

>>87912

More ridiculous stupidity from this guy. Not that I'm the slightest bit surprised.


 No.88269

>>88026

What challenge is there to take? You already lost. Zoophilia in and of itself is an "attraction to animals" it doesn't differentiate between a mindless feral mutt or an anthro furry, both are still "animals", bestiality, on the other hand, IS specific to actual animals, but that was never part of the debate. So if you want to ride the "cub's pedophilia" train because cubs are "young" fine, but on that same page you can't then 180 and deny the term "zoophilia" because the "animals" you get off too aren't the same as other animals.

>N-no, an attraction to anthro is an attraction to human adults, so it's not zoo.

Then there wouldn't be a need for the animal head, tail, hands, feet, mannerisms, etc if the animal traits/aspects played no part in the appeal.

I couldn't care less if you continue to shit on them, that doesn't change who you are, or the deeper implications of what YOU'RE into.


 No.88271

>>88269

does anyone in this debate of zoophillia or pedophilla make valid arguments or are we just going to make fantasty arguments esp about pedophillia that seem to have no understanding of how the real world works.


 No.88274

>>88271

Not really, no. At the risk of seeming like I'm pulling the "I was just pretending" backpedal, I flipped the logic and arguments in the zoo posts because of/to make an example of how all anyone ever has are personal/gut feelings, "proof and evidence" based on one or two scattered events, or the good ol "you like the IDEA of it in fiction, so you'd like the same in reality too, ie all shit, baseless arguments.

The only "valid" argument is that issues like this are nuanced. There's indeed people who are guilty by association, but to pretend they're the gold standard because you don't like that subject matter's juvenile. There's no quick, broad brush you can paint any large group with, but since sagefag feels validated in thinking anyone who so much as argues in favor or defense of cub's on the same level as legitimate pedos/ pedo apologists like the ones in the lavadog thread, shit's gonna keep happening and more threads are gonna get derailed.

On that point, direct your sperg fits here, and keep them there sagefag >>87748


 No.88303

File: 8b7f3c59a4e6eaf⋯.png (147.84 KB, 1466x244, 733:122, why some fetishes are alwa….PNG)

>>88269

>>88274

Your intentions are quite transparent so you're not fooling me on anything pedo.

Also I'm quite aware and have posted in the linked thread, but no I'm not gonna make things easy on you and stay in a dead thread so you can roam around unperturbed.




File: c551623b901633c⋯.png (808.64 KB, 893x709, 893:709, end it.png)

 No.66055[Reply]

You're spending absurd amounts of money on those commissions of yours. Come show them off so you can get asspats and maybe dickpats from all the other attention whores.

Old thread:

>>42843

328 posts and 187 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.88211

File: 8b18b5dbb8b0c2b⋯.png (12.41 MB, 3950x3260, 395:326, lewd.png)

>impulsively ab into a ych like a brainlet

>forced to fuck a female

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH

no but in all seriousness I'm quite pleased with how it turned out.

Though, honestly, I think I'll stick to normal commissions, ych's are a bit too...volatile for me and really expensive actually.


 No.88245

File: aa2c8cef86f9d49⋯.png (232.72 KB, 925x589, 925:589, Ferne sonny cuddlefugg.png)

File: 1b86a34bf2c5851⋯.png (653.46 KB, 1900x1600, 19:16, Ferne sonny tease.png)

File: d54dd2a0c2d303c⋯.png (138.05 KB, 500x410, 50:41, Fernedong teased.png)

>>88211

Stop being such a faggot and (get) fuck(ed by) my fox instead then


 No.88259

>>88245

What a shit fox.


 No.88261

File: 66f54d99713702e⋯.png (4.79 MB, 3402x3343, 3402:3343, foxie2fix.png)

>>88245

o-ok anon, I'll let your fox fuck me uwuwu

it's hard to say no to foxes anyway


 No.88272

File: ff0c40397a27f24⋯.png (431.16 KB, 2028x2871, 676:957, Ferne Panties Hard.png)

File: f808193ca52e016⋯.png (1.65 MB, 3144x2792, 393:349, Ferne rut bun.png)

>>88261

Then check your notes on FA, faggot. <3

It'll be from AbKaz uwu




File: a2a4549d8e43c35⋯.jpg (188.01 KB, 900x872, 225:218, sally_acorn_skeleton.jpg)

 No.85987[Reply]

ITT: Things furries have done that scare or disturb you.

80 posts and 12 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.87970

>>87951

What relation does the show itself have to the real Eerie as you know him? For example, do you see the show as canon and documenting events that actually happened to Eerie, or do you see the show as portraying Eerie accurately, but in fictional situations (like when a famous actor is portrayed in a cartoon and voices himself).


 No.88005

>>87960

>we never have sex

Well then you're not even gay. It's perfectly fine and typical for two straight guys to have an extremely close relationship, even bordering on romance, without it being gay. You're not even attracted to each other in that way (which breaks the comparison to Shinji, because Shinji admitted being attracted to Kaworu) so it's very different. The fact that he would be willing to have sex doesn't change the fact that you DON'T. You can't describe a possibility the same way as you describe an action; that's thoughtcrime.


 No.88014

>>87970

>>88005

ask me this shit on my board, fuck /fur/


 No.88021

>>88014

i did it for you >>>/eerie/1008


 No.88263

>>87933

Yeah, he didn't write that. You did. Why make up drama out of thin air, when there's plenty that's pre-existing?

>>87949

>eerie and i are gay together now. it still makes me uncomfortable but it's better this way

I'm frankly glad. If you're male and you're attracted to a male, as far as I see it, insistently denying yourself that will only hurt you.

>>87960

>i don't think faggotry is healthy and i didn't want him to be a faggot

Constantly using "faggot" says you have a deep-seated hate for homosexuals, but the question is: WHY do you? The only semi-solid argument against them has been religious. "The BIBLE says..." and all that-- yet even the Biblical support has some shakiness.

>we never have sex

That's not a requirement for every loving relationship.




File: b775a48e6769e7a⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 97.08 KB, 1170x663, 30:17, 8639ed7c9553d1057784bffc55….jpg)

 No.42992[Reply]

So what's been going on with Bad Dragon?

It seems like the quality of their toys has dropped, at the least I've seen a lot more complaints about defects or tearing.

Also they've scrubbed the site of all art associated with each toy for some reason, which is even more confounding. How am I supposed to get off if I don't know which imaginary animal hunk is ruining my ass?

250 posts and 86 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

 No.87915

>>79698

>Tags shouldn't autofill to other tags

Yu want some way to handle variations of the same tags and shorthands: for example you want all dicks to be tagged "dick" or "cock" or "penis", not a mix of the three, and you want to be able to indicate "jojo's bizarre adventures" by typing "jjba".


 No.87961

>>87915

Tagging rules should be enforced properly instead of just being shitty guidelines if they're going to bother with it at all. Considering that it usually defaults to the most proper and correct terminology (like gay -> male/male), tags for "dick" or "cock" should not exist. It should be "penis", or nothing. If you're typing in the wrong fucking tags, it shouldn't work at all!

Why can't they make it so the uploader, instead, picks them from a list of already existing tags rather than typing their own? Might as well throw in a requirement for there to be a certain number of tags, for it to require a sex/gender tag (even if it's ambiguous_gender) and genital tags if it's marked as rating:explicit, for there to be an artist tag (even if it's unknown_artist) and shit like that. Would be REALLY SIMPLE programming to do this. Then you wouldn't constantly end up with shit like an explicit solo pinup getting uploaded with nothing but "fox", "girl" and "vagna"[sic]; or an image of a video game character get "video" and "games" tags because the uploader can't into proper formatting.

No, instead they want to cater to lazy retards.


 No.88057

>>87961

>Tagging rules should be enforced properly

Of course, no system of rules can work without good enforcing.

>tags for "dick" or "cock" should not exist.

And that's what autofilling them to "penis" or your tag of choice does: there are other ways to do it, sure, but

>If you're typing in the wrong fucking tags, it shouldn't work at all!

is terrible both for the taggers and for the average user.

Your average user is not going to stick around if they need to remember a bunch of very strict and specific tag rules just to get the simplest searches to work, and your taggers don't like accidentally creating a new tag/getting an error because they forgot about autistic_tag_proposal_4681643 choosing autistic_tag_46646 to replace autistic_tag_13118.

Autofill solves the issue by both correctly interpreting the alternative tags as synonymous of the main tag, and correctly showing which is the main tag.

>Why can't they make it so the uploader, instead, picks them from a list of already existing tags rather than typing their own?

Because the resulting tag list would be enormous and would freeze most browsers for several seconds as soon as you tried to browse it (even hyrdus has performance issues on relatively small tag lists with a few dozen thousands entries), because you'd need a formal approval process to create any single new tags, and because someone searching for "hands tied" will never find "tied hands" unless you implement what's essentially autofill to different tags.

There's a few more reasons but those are the main ones, off the top of my head.

>Might as well throw in a requirement for there to be a certain number of tags

That's already a rule on e6, and it's a good idea.

>for it to require a sex/gender tag (even if it's ambiguous_gender) [...] and genital tags if it's marked as rating:explicit

Interesting proposal.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.88198

>>88057

>Autofill solves the issue by both correctly interpreting the alternative tags as synonymous

In theory. In practice it allows the people who create those autofills to abuse this power by policing speech. You know how literally everyone on imageboards hates word-filters (changes words that the BO and mods don't like into other words)? It's exactly the same.

There's no reason why new tags needs to be created. Ever. The database of existing tags is sufficient (and many of them could be pruned because they reference irrelevant things, like background objects).

Everything else is just proving

>instead they want to cater to lazy retards

completely correct. People who can't be bothered to use a proper tagging system don't deserve a proper tagging system. That's why IKEA furniture is garbage. It's not because the concept is bad (literally all furniture is made from parts attached to each other). It's because they have to make it easily assembled by even a complete idiot (often with no tools), so it's badly-engineered and flimsy.

One thing: why would loading a tag list freeze a browser?? One can literally, right now, go on e621 and browse a list of all tags. It obviously doesn't put all of them on same page at the same time. That would be absurd. The list would just be alphabetical across multiple pages, or perhaps with an autofill search function to make things quicker.

On topic: still thinking of getting one of these: primalhardwere.com/category/inflatables , but don't know whether I want to spend that kind of money on something that might break after only a short time of use. The structure of them seems very fragile.


 No.88260

>>88198

>In practice it allows the people who create those autofills to abuse this power by policing speech.

Mods are going to abuse their power regardless if they wish to, without even bothering to follow their own rules at all: see e6 and "tag what you see" being overruled every time a mod gets salty.

Even then, a mod that wanted to be a cunt wihtout autofill would just delete the tags he dislikes and force the alternative to be used, under threat of ban.

>There's no reason why new tags needs to be created. Ever. The database of existing tags is sufficient

Even with a rich db such as e6 you will have to create new tags for new artists, new characters, Ignoring that, it's still shortsighted as it assumes the current tags are perfect and don't need to be compacted/grouped further, since those operations could require new parent tags to be created.

Cherry on the cake, your system doesnt work for a new booru, or anything smaller than e6 really.

>People who can't be bothered to use a proper tagging system don't deserve a proper tagging system.

Tagging is an enormously time consuming effort, if you don't spread it between many people you're not going far.

Starting with ridiculously higher than the norm standards and an elitist attitude is going to drive away anyone that's not a wikipedia tier autist, and they're not fun to work with.

>That's why IKEA furniture is garbage.

The price tag is a better explaination, you can make good and easy to assemble furniture but adequate materials are not cheap, especially for all the pins you need.

>One thing: why would loading a tag list freeze a browser?? One can literally, right now, go on e621 and browse a list of all tags.

On e6 you aren't loading the list in the browser.

The server is not loading the list either, only updating a cached version if needed, taking out some chunks of it, and using those chunks to make the pages you load.

This mePost too long. Click here to view the full text.




Delete Post [ ]
[]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / cyoa / general / leftpol / newbrit / tingles / vg ]