>This isn't an argument. It's just an appeal to outrage.
The argument is that a child can't grasp the full consequences of exposing themselves to the internet in such a humiliating manner. They lack the mental and emotional apparatus to make an informed decision on their sexuality. Therefor they cannot consent. Pedos constantly deny this by projecting their own adult faculties onto children
Not even the same anon but>>34458
>Nobody is letting children get harmed. That would imply there is some way for OP (or anyone else who views such images) to prevent children from getting harmed.
It IS harm to put them into a sexual scenario when they're too young to grasp the consequences.
>Fapping to an image does not constitute support for the creators of that image because the creators have no way of knowing you are fapping to it.
Except raising their veiwcount so they produce more
>Distributing isn't just unethical due to privacy. You can try to rationalize it any way you like, but distribution tends to be violation of the law in majority of western countries.
Okay, now that is a poor argument. It's bad because of the psychological impact on the children, not because it's illegal
here, enjoy some milfs, degenerate