No.610
Am I the only one who thinks this stupid motherfucker doesn't understand any of the shit that he watches? Like, he makes some valid points once in a while but usually he's just such a fucking jackoff holy shit
No.614
>>610if I am anything to go by, you are indeed the only one. Perhaps it's just how my taste generally corellates with his, and I can absolutely agree with you in some ways that he's a bit self contented for someone who clearly has little knowledge of the classics but his general view seems pretty valid and well argued.
No.622
>>610I think he's just gotten into cinema not -too- long ago. He really isn't that bad. He's just hating on a lot of movies because that's how you make money on youtube. By being a critic that dissect movies you are critical of. Just stick to RLM. They aren't perfect either but they certainly know more about cinema then he does.
No.688
I think to some degree he does but he is way too picky. I don't think he understands all of cinema and understands the art house side. People like Mike and Jay from RLM truly understand film because unlike YMS they've made music. YMS makes music, if he understands music why the fuck doesn't he just make videos about music then? If doesn't get the whole picture why make videos?!
No.695
>>688Not to make you any more angry but you know he has implied that he wants to make movies in the future. Now putting his ability to critique movies aside that's a horrible idea. Even Nostalgia critic tried to do that as far as I know. Ebert too. I do not understand why critics believe talking and thinking about movies makes one able to make them.
No.698
>>695But Nostalgia Critic really does know jack shit about films.
No.706
>>698Very true. Which is why I don't even know the details of his efforts towards film making. Even if he did though I think the most important skills to have as a film maker do not come from watching movies.
No.713
He watches absolute moronic garbage multiple times and says Haneke is his favorite director and The Holy Mountain his favorite film.
It sounds like he hasn't even heard of Tarkovsky or Tarr…and these are entry level in the scale of patrician-hood.
No.717
>>688I find it hard to say RLM understands 'film'…they know how making a formulaic movie works, but a FUCK TRUFFAUT skit a patrician does not make.
No.753
Is this guy internet famous or something?
I think I remember watching his "review" of Turin Horse a some time ago where he essentially repeated "I got what the movie was about." over and over, are all of his videos like this?
No.758
>>753kind of, he can come across as pretty pretentious and to a significant extent he is, but, despite not having that much knowledge of cinema history he seems to be able to formulate pretty good arguments, at least that's what I think of him, but I really do understand just thinking of him as a pretentious dick who doesn't know shit.
No.762
>>753He's internet famous for saying "It's harder to be a furry than it is to be gay".
No.768
>>762Well, it probably is I think.
No.772
>>768I guess you could talk about your experiences on both sides of the fence.
No.781
No.785
>>781Yes, he came out during one of his 'let's play' videos…don't ask me which one.
No.797
>>785Do you know what's his fursona?
>>772pfft
No.831
*raises paw*
Fursonally, I like him very much :3
No.840
>>610honestly, I love this motherfucker. I think his sense of humor is awesome and he has some great opinions. I mean I don't agree with all of them, but I feel like he knows what he's talking about.
No.924
No.933
Since I'm a massive pleb, his top 10s have been a bit helpful.
I agree that he is a massive twat.
No.959
>tfw he didn't post a new video for nearly a month
>tfw waking up to new, glorious 55 min video from your favourite youtuber
I luv this guy.
No.962
>>959What the fuck do you mean…you woke up a week ago?
No.1345
i don't think he is to pretentious. just more so than the average movie goer. I think most of his reviews are made to help the average movie goer get into "higher cinema" and help explain to them why certain blockbusters are bad with evidence, not just opinion.
I like his videos. His recommendation are nice.
No.1346
No.1348
No.1361
No.1898
He nitpicks too much to pad out his reviews. That part in his Toy Story 3 review where he points out that the metal golf club couldn't hold Woody and Buzz isn't even a flaw to anyone but autists who don't get film.
No.2280
that guy only likes artsy foreign films
No.2301
i find his videos near unwatchable for a few reasons. he takes 30 minutes to say what could very easily be condensed into a 10 minute review. he repeats himself too often and constantly says how what he is saying is only an opinion blah blah. i get that he does it to attempt to prevent abuse in the youtube comment section but after a few videos of hearing it i've gotten the point and have gotten sick of it.
too nitpicky.
the other reason is that stupid face he uses as a display picture/edits into his videos.
i still watch his videos occasionally as a means of finding movies to watch.
No.2304
No.2307
No.2312
>>695>Who is Jean Luc Godard>Who is Michael Haneke>Who is Wim Wenders No.2313
Yeah Cahiers du Cinema was full of future directors.
And don't forget Ascot Man.
But yt critics are probably a different story. I just don't get the appeal.
No.2405
>>610He doesn't seem horrible. I'll be honest he's about the same level of film nerd as I so if I started this I'd be doing the same so I can't hate him.
No.3072
He is way to picky. Personally while i agree dawn of the planet of the apes was shit tier hollywood shitfest like mainstream cinema, i enjoyed it as an entertaining movie. What he and many other dont understand is that there is more to film than pretencious art student shit
No.3073
>>622lmao but RLM doesnt know shit about film. whenever someone asks if I've seen plinkett reviews IRL is when I know that someone is a pleb
are you also someone that has just gotten into cinema?
No.3218
His review of Only God Forgives turned me off to him. He's way too impatient and it seems that he judges things way too harshly on just the surface; Film is a complex medium that functions on several levels, but it seems that he only sees a few of them.
Also, looking at his IMDb, he gives way too fucking many movies 10/10 ratings. I've been watching films for 13 years and I've only ever seen two that I could consider 10/10.
No.3606
>>695It pisses me the fuck off that Nostalgia Critic thinks that some films don't warrant having experimental cinematography. He probably doesn't even know that cinematographers are a thing, and just assumes the director does it.
At least YMS doesn't advertise himself as like an expert or something.
No.3607
No.3847