[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha / fascist / fast / magali / orthodox / r / shota / u ]

/newsplus/ - News +

Read the News!
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


THE RULES
The heartbeat of 8chan is strong


File: 9516169e6a86d17⋯.jpg (14.15 KB, 672x371, 96:53, $.jpg)

 No.238268

Earlier this year, we reported on a situation regarding Chrome and proposed changes to ad blocking that would greatly limit the ability of modern adblockers to filter content. Under Google’s new rules, extensions would be limited to a list of 30,000 items to be filtered. uBlock Origin, a popular ad blocking utility, currently ships with 90,000 filters, and supports up to half a million. But then, after massive user outcry, Google seemed to reverse course. The company announced that new dynamic lists would also be supported, implying this would be a partial solution to the 30K static list limit.

The discussion about what kind of rules the extension community needs versus what Google wants to enable has been ongoing, and Google has published a major response to a prepared document summarizing the extension communities’ concerns that raises new fears about what the company is planning to do. You can read the company’s full response here, but one particular sentence is causing frustration:

“Chrome is deprecating the blocking capabilities of the webRequest API in Manifest V3, not the entire webRequest API (though blocking will still be available to enterprise deployments).”

more here:

https://www.extremetech.com/internet/292320-future-chrome-changes-may-make-normal-ad-blocking-an-enterprise-only-feature

 No.238277

Is there a "No Script" add-on for that browser?


 No.238303

File: ff3168f3626a75b⋯.jpg (1.69 MB, 3264x2448, 4:3, IMG_3882.JPG)

And yet People think Google is a Good Guy?

Stop supporting the Evil Ones ..


 No.238345

>>238303

Google makes enormous amounts of money from ads. It’s their main revenue stream. Without it there would be no free apps like chrome. It’s not exactly in their best interests to cut off their source of income.

That said I think they should take a realistic look at how ad blockers affect their bottom line. Something tells me an insignificant proportion of users actually run ad blockers.

The proportion would be even lower if ads weren’t more than 50% of the content on most web sites.


 No.238393

Meh…

I fully switched to Firefox 2 Years Ago, and I don't regret it.

Say what you want about Mozilla, at least they don't secretly block internet content (especially videos) if they don't like them and disguise it as a DNS error.

Yes! Chrome does that!


 No.238442

>using Chrome

>not using Pale Moon or some other firefox fork

Why are you alive?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha / fascist / fast / magali / orthodox / r / shota / u ]