Well, at least you have a good attitude. Hope you can do something good. Even if the art is not that great, the game can always have other strong points, like good writing, good gameplay, or something similar. Hell, text based games are pretty good.
Another thing, don't listen to faggots that want you to add and to a lesser extent remove content in your game. They are usually fetish fags, so you'll usually see things like "this game would be better if it had [SHIT FETISH]". You can try to rationalize it yourself, maybe you actually like what they suggest, but if you get the feeling that is not going to work, it probably won't, no matter how much autists scream and whine about it. Pic related.
Actually, I don't have many problems with RPG maker other than being one of the most massive piece of shit engines to make games in. It's easy, it doesn't require a lot of knowledge, but it's restrictive as fuck. You can heavily modify it if you need to, but at that point, you're better off using something else.
>Is it good?
Yes it is. Is an actual game and pretty good at that. It's phoenix wright medieval porn version. Admittedly, I only played 0.1 when the dev came here, so dunno how the new content is, but the dev seems competent as he claimed, since the art does look good, it does have a good premise, and the gameplay is there.
>if you miss the milkman the third day at 7AM, you never reach the good end.
That was one of my complains to that dev too, I don't remember what he said about it, though, check the thread if you want, or ask him yourself if he is still around and I doubt it.