/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

>>13635850

OP, I'm sorry but you need to phrase your thread into a question like:

>what are the political implications of God existing?

otherwise it's not political and you will only generate a handful of replies as your thread sits in the catalog for months

>>13635850

We are all a brotherhood of the afflicted.

Your idea makes complete sense, certainly contains the answer for the spiritual hunger most humans have.

You will need to address the religious aspect, people will always want a step by step process. Look at the talmud for example, do you think these people just drop it and walk away?

Imagine what Socrates had envisioned of the perfect world. It was so far out there that Plato had to finish his work by the great noble lie, writing his book laws and promoting a messianic philosophy at the school of alexandria leading to proto Christianity.

>>13635850

Have you tried willfully creating a cult? With enough followers it's certainly possible.

I can imagine it now

>I've traveled far and wide, please teach us your ways

>shut your fucking mouth and eat these mushroom

>>13636346

Drink the the JJ coolaid

https://dailycoin.com/mysterious-killings-in-crypto/

“Cliff should be careful, boomers always fall for the honeypot.”

My solution is this:

- your consciousness is the product of your body, especially your brain though not limited to it. I suggest looking into the latest research in neuroscience. Its quite interesting.

- I've also given a lot of thought to the idea that I only have access to my own mind, but no access yo the minds of others, indeed, I have no access to anything else aside from my own mind since all things external to that come to me only through my mind and its reaction to what experience I assume arrives to me through my senses. But I also realize that I can't trust most of my mind either, the thoughts and feelings that come to my conscious experience arrive from other parts of my brain or body, making them no more trustworthy than my senses. The core of me is the part of myself that receives the experience of my own existence, that's why even if you make a perfect copy of me, it would not be me, since I would not be able to access the experiences had by that copy the same way I could not truly experience what others do, as i stated earlier.

-, I've also through about the idea that most definitely, all things are simultaneously true and false, and what is real or not is entirely dependant upon where in the omniverse one happens to make reference to. Objectively we exist within a time cube, where rather than one universe that moves and changes, there is an infinite number of universes in different states that do not move or change at all, and that means that at around every Planck unit of time its an entirely different universe where everything is wholly separate from everything that existed I the universes before or would exist in the universes after. Think of it like a reel of film, and that is the true structure of the timeline, and the movie projected on the screen of the theatre is the illusion of a moving picture that is produced by our memories of how things used to be different. And from the one timeline of eternalism we can further assume the existence of other timelines that are identical in all ways except for a slight difference just before the last universe in the timeline. And extending out from this we can imagine one timeline for every sequence of states that a set of universes could be in. Which are bounded only by their need to conform to the laws of the multiverse, which is why time travel can take you to where events (universe states of being) are different from your timeline of origin (going back in time means subjectively experiencing it as travelling through the universes of other timelines until you get to the universe of a timeline that was identical to your own up until the point where you arrived, but objectively you haven't travelled at all, since nothing truly moves and all those "yous" aren't the same entity, you haven't created a branching timeline, all these timelines have always existed and always will, never moving nor changing in any way), but why going back in time cannot take you to a place where the laws of nature governing the possible states of universes and what sequences they could be in are different. But one could imagine that there are an infinite multitude of multiverses each with their own set of natural laws, producing their own infinity of timelines, and within those universe states, such that all things happen or exist somewhere in what we could call the ultimate ensemble of tegmark or the onmiverse, though it goes even further than that and accepts the existence even of impossible things that tegmark himself would dismiss the existence of, meaning that your favorite anime is actually a true story somewhere, just not here or anywhere close to here within the omniverse. And naturally this means that the god of the bible would exist in some part of the omniverse, but not all of it, though god himself would not be aware of that, being omnipotent and omniscient within the regions he lives in and possibly assuming they know there's nothing beyond that.

- I will be honest I don't quote get what you are saying, it's as hard to read as this is, and frankly I will run your post through an ai to figure out what it says, and I hope you so the same with what I've written here. As well.

I dont know if any other people besides me is conscious, I'm the only one I knew with 100% certainty to be conscious.

As such, the observer is me, and the rest of the universe can just be a tunneled theater I'm experimenting with my physical body.

This idea is called solipsism, and it is the extreme opposite of panpsychism. Both use the same principles, but arrives at different conclusions.

You can say that everything is conscious, even inanimated objects (a rock is part of Earth, which is conscious in its own relative manner), but you dont know in what degree they are conscious, and you can't be sure if they are as conscious as you are or not. In other words, you dont know if they are observers.

And if they are, there is also the theory of the multiverse, where each conscious element has its own separate universe, and deal with projections from other universes, representing other conscious elements. So in my universe I'm dealing with a npc version of you, which appears as pixels on a screen, while you are dealing with a npc version of me, in your own universe. This theory run counters to the "we are all one" from pantheism, because the one would be many here (indefinite dyad).

As such, god is just a projection of politics into the unexplainable. You have a king sitting on a golden throne in the sky. You need an authority guiding you so that you dont feel responsible for your own decisions. The appeal to authority means you are less conscious than a responsible person.