/tv/ - Television and Movies

I heard harming net neutrality would harm goigle. Is that true?

t. stupid person

sjw will essentially disappear without these shitty websites to voice their opinion

let it happen

>>978498

Remember when all these screeching commie retards who just love net neutrality where screaming for Daily Stormer, 4chan, 8chan and whatever else they politically oppose to be taken off the internet. I remember.

>>978508

if /pol/ get taken off the internet because of Trump then it would be the biggest case of buyer's remorse in history.

>muh internet (((porn)))

the jew butthurt would be glorious

>government interference causes ISP market to become dominated by a couple of companies

>"WE NEED MORE GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE TO FIX THIS!!!!"

never change, retards

>>978522

>hating the based government

let it die, i'm more interested in seeing what rises from the ashes, even if it takes years to manifest, right now we're stuck in a dead zone of people knowing we have a problem, but not yet at a threshold of people with the technical expertise to address those problems coming together and devising and developing a plan to overcome and reinvent the internet and privacy, we need to force the hand of web evolution and passing net neutrality would be a great start

>>978514

>Daily Stormer

Hate sites should be banned. Banning hate sites and supporting net neutrality does not make you a hypocrite.

>>978514

I don't think you understand the concept of net neutrality

>>978571

>"All bits are equal."

>"But some are more equal than others."

Fuck off commie.

>>978578

Now, I know you don't understand the concept of net neutrality.

>>978579

pro tip: how you think something should work isn't always the same as how it actually will work

>>978582

>says nothing

stay pleb

>>978508

Idiot, they would go easy on SJW sites, it would censor the right way harder. Just look at how Antifa is treated by the media and platforms like Twitter.

>not downloading everything of value from the internet

It is like you want to be charged rental fees.

Save Netflix! Not my problem. Let them pay up

Save Youtube! Not my problem Let them pay up.

Save the Free Internet! When was the internet ever free?

>>978592

Do you have a time machine?

Downloads work for existing things. News and information is a different story.

>>978593

>big corps shill for ending net neutrality

>hurr le joo conspiracy le soros

Kill yourself

>>978608

I actually like this idea tbh, I get sick of paying for literally 100s of 1000s of websites I know I'll never use anyway. This is basically perfect for me. :)

>>978508

sjws are all you care about? fucking retard.

>>978608

Anyone who believes this is a retard.

Net Neutrality is a leftist gimmick to try and socialize the internet by declaring it a utility. Essentially they're trying to force companies to pricelock.

What it's really preventing is companies from having "premium packages". Shit like what's described there would be classed as censorship and is worked around easily anyway. On top of that competition would make companies that tried to take services away go bankrupt very quickly.

What the fight is really over is companies wanting to spend more money to offer even higher speed internet to people willing to pay more. "Net Neutrality" is really just an effort to keep the internet slower, slow down the flow of information and socialize the service.

But most of the internet is too incredibly stupid to get this, why do you think Moot supported it? Remember how he was outed as an SJW?

>>978593

this is the most retarded post I've read on /tv/. Now I remember why I stopped going on /pol/.

if Jew corporations started fundraising to cure cancer would you stick your head in a microwave and give yourself a tumor?

the internet can only be truly neutral when we eliminate all racism, antisemitism, sexism, nazism and right wingers from it, until then it is only a place for bigotry and hatred.

>>978685

>if Jew corporations started fundraising to cure cancer

They already do, its called a tax deduction dumbass

Yellow fever Jim about Net Neutrality

>>978620

>Implying google, facebook and twitter are not big corporations too

>>978608

this is the ideal internet tbh, this way is easy to regulate access to websites and to stop hackers, my wife's computer is hacked almost daily, her browser is always filled with links to pornographic content involving gentlemen of color.

>>978502

It's lose/lose, no matter what.

Pro NN: Things stay the same. ISPs meter your connection and charge $$ per GB or TB.

Anti NN: ISPs get to decide what is or isn't allowed on "their" networks. I put their in quotes, because the American taxpayer and anybody with a telephone or cable TV footed the bill for all the infrastructure in the 80s and 90s. All ISPs do any more is pay for routers and switches and guys to hook cables up to your house.

>>978687

this post is what real this is what autism looks like

>>978689

fuck off

>>978784

this guy is Sargon's sidekick. Literally a lesser Sargon. Why te fuck would you watch this video?

>>978730

It's used as a tax reduction scheme as the government views it as a contribution to humanity. Keep in mind that those cancer organizations give the majority of their funds for awareness/self-funding and the remaining towards research.

>>978502

No because Netflix and Google have the money to pay for ISP rent seeking.

Random upstarts do not.

>>978568

It very well does. Quit using mental gymnastics

>>978814

I'm saying you completely missed the point of my post, I don't give a shit about what you're talking about. Autism might be too far but you're definitely dense.

>>978816

>supporting socialism

hello leftypol

>>978852

If it puts an end to it, I support it.

Either they don't tax the small sites, because they can't pay, so in the end google has to pay zillions to each ISP while small 1.0 comfy websites can do with little tax (because of so little traffic), which means it becomes a /tech/ utopia, or they tax users who want to visit certain small sites and botnetize the web, which is a /tech/ dystopia.

I'm betting my money on the latter, but the first one could be (and I wish it happened - Verizon n such should take the opportunity to take so much from goog).

I don;t think anything is going to happen tbh. reddit will be butthurt for a week or so, and then when nothing happens, everyone will forget about it.

>>978578

spot on, he's actually a commie

>>978608

>js bloated websites die because users can't guarantee having more than 128 kbps

It's a beautiful future

>>978940

>tripfagging

>>978852

stop posting that ugly retard

http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/net-neutrality/

>meanwhile liberals remain silent on the wave of bans on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, etc for people stating opinions they don't like

These cunts don't care one iota about "freedom" or "neutrality"

>>979027

A private site is a private site. If they want to ban someone thats their decision

>>979033

Such a shit argument. I guess I can kick you out of starbucks because I don't like whiny hipster faggots then?

>people are mad about retard deterrents for the internet

poorfags, the lot of you

>>979043

if you own the place, sure

>>979043

>Such a shit argument. I guess I can kick you out of starbucks because I don't like niggers or faggots then?

Well you should. but uncle sammy says you can only do that to white people :/

Don't worry Elon Musk will save us with his internet satellites!