1. Should we even bother responding now that most people don't trust media- especially HuffPo?
1a. Even a trolly response? Not the string of insults like the Kossacs did to that king, but something like
> Due to distrust in the media at an all-time high, your bias, your non-existent ethics, and your blatant lack of fact checking, we do not wish to speak through you.
1b. Worth responding via social media? I.e. Make a #, and fill it with infographs on how everything on GG was a lie. (FBI report, that guy who analyzed the tweets to prove it wasn't a hate campaign, how games we said were propaganda pieces sold poorly, how many voices demanding diversity are doing it for alterier motives or lost money, etc).
However, this does counter-act one of our early tenants (don't respond to fake labels. If you do, people stop asking "Are GG's concerns legitimate?" and start asking "What is GG really about?" - And MSM can play that song & dance until people get bored of following it. And pic kind-of related).
Of course, we could use that # and just post old infographs on DeepFreeze & other corruption. Use their reach to share our info.
> Why do you hate women?
> #HuffPoReply Here's what GG is about.
2. Any chance of a fake third-party answering the call? What's to stop Huff-Po mashing out their answer on a key-board?
2a. How do we disprove a fake Huff-Po answer?
3. If 2 is not a risk, do we just ignore it?
No matter what, we know that replying directly to them on their terms will not work. They will edit & rewrite like the daily show.
There was an old screencap of why we should never fight on their turf- they should always come to ours.
In our case, a live debate, public discussion on social media (where everyone can see), or just let them report on what we do.