[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / dempart / doomer / komica / tingles / zooscat ]

/film/ - FILM

Catalog   Archive

Winner of the 68rd Attention-Hungry Games
/d/ - Home of Headswap and Detachable Girl Threads

January 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
File *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

Welcome to /film/ discussion - Captcha - Info - Threads - Boardtracker - Friends: [ tv ] - Check us out on Letterboxd and Endchan

File: 1431230772734.gif (282.46 KB, 500x218, 250:109, snap.gif)


What do you think of them?

Can you appreciate any musicals or do showtunes give you a migraine?

3 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1431699307583.jpg (248.3 KB, 1054x1500, 527:750, 81Lt0k8fmiL._SL1500_.jpg)

The Blues brothers is one of my favorite films.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

I've wanted to watch HEAD but I keep forgetting about it


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Everything Busby Berkeley did in the early 1930's is essential—not really for the music but for the sets and choreography.



any other recs?

I'm interested to see


South Pacific

Porgy and Bess

My Fair Lady (I don't expect it to be better than Pygmalion)

all these musicals have something else in common...


File: 0a36c1fa414a2c5⋯.png (296.22 KB, 480x360, 4:3, Monteverdi1.png)

File: 4355377d03a6d86⋯.png (361.39 KB, 480x360, 4:3, Monteverdi2.png)

File: aba8e5b40de790e⋯.png (210.54 KB, 480x360, 4:3, Monteverdi3.png)

File: 62ab0d5fc052637⋯.png (399.24 KB, 480x360, 4:3, Monteverdi4.png)

File: 8112ea5bb9b39d2⋯.png (302.23 KB, 480x360, 4:3, Monteverdi5.png)

I just discovered Jean-Pierre Ponnelle. This looks fantastic even though I've always hated opera.

File: a4133a392f4cd0b⋯.jpg (25.5 KB, 360x480, 3:4, 1352513431943.jpg)



I think /film is saved! I've never seen so much activity in my whole time here!

Hooray! Let's celebrate by posting people perfect for /кино! I'll start :)




File: 31fb04814717e52⋯.jpg (2.89 MB, 3600x2552, 450:319, The_Illustration_of_The_Si….jpg)

File: f380519129f0ef4⋯.jpg (118.92 KB, 500x376, 125:94, the-red-and-the-white-janc….jpg)

Not too active today. It will probably go up and down as usual but I think the overboard helps.

> Let's celebrate by posting people perfect for /кино

I've found ideal candidates while reading Wikipedia but I can't remember them right now...

How about historical events? I want to see something about the Siberian War.


Miklós Jancsó directed a film about a very similar conflict in Hungary, The Red and the White


File: 2be0da81c0ad6a5⋯.jpg (75.9 KB, 832x690, 416:345, 2be0da81c0ad6a5e5238497fed….jpg)

film is saved!

File: 59c195d04b6cd66⋯.png (163.83 KB, 450x300, 3:2, THE-WONDER.-THE-WONDER..png)


Hello! I'm not exactly certain how alive this board is, but hopefully you can help. I'm looking for depressing films. Some films I think might be considered depressing (or in some way dealing with depression)that I enjoyed: The seventh continent, wild strawberries, taxi driver, eraserhead, and The Seventh Seal.

If any of you guys could recommend something to me, I would be very grateful. Thank you!

23 posts and 20 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


Have you seen Grave of the fireflies?


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


that video is blocked in US but I found a trailer



Is it now? Well that sucks, but there are probably other sources out there. A great film in my opinion


File: f590fe32454f1cc⋯.jpg (74.42 KB, 500x743, 500:743, dml.jpg)



I'd say the approach of this film is more optimistic about humanity, not full-on misanthropic, but yeah the imagery alone is pretty bleak.

File: 829d57fa0edaeb7⋯.gif (9.21 MB, 320x240, 4:3, crdB94y.gif)


Just checked back in. When will /film/ have a quality renaissance?




this thread isn't raising quality at all


If we can't raise quality, let's at least lament and reflect on its current level.

(So here's a shortest description of human culture.)


It might pick up after summer is over



After democrats get their asses kicked midterms and their party dissolves, unlocking the control the left/neo-liberals have on Hollywood.

(((They))) will get desperate and release films that aren't plagued by cultural marxism.


File: 1419725198647.jpg (130.1 KB, 1256x919, 1256:919, Andrei_Tarkovsky.jpg)


Let's get philosophical for a moment, /film/. Over the past several years, I've been getting deeper and deeper into film, and have watched countless movies from increasingly obscure countries and directors, which veer further and further away from accessibility and closer to art. I've found that the effect of viewing so many films which, assuming you buy at least a little bit into the auteur theory, are personal expressions of the feelings of the directors and writers who created them, is my increasing realization of the subjectivity of human experience.

Essentially, being exposed to all of these differing subjective visions of these artists has stripped away my preconceptions of ideology and caused me to question the forces which govern my own life and existence. I haven't really done any hallucinogens, but I've been around people who have, and I feel like exposure to art has the same dissociating effects that drugs can, in that art makes you realize your own insignificance, and also connection to the greater whole of humanity. I'm not trying to say that I'm some sort of enlightened being just because I have watched a bunch of obscure movies, but I do feel like watching so many personal and artistic films has caused a change in myself and my perception of the world. Sorry for the rant, but if this makes any sense, does anyone else feel the same? I can also clarify what I mean in more detail if I have to, I think what I'm saying makes sense but it's kind of hard to put into words succinctly.


I don't have much to add but I agree. Same happened to me in a way.
I take it your choosing of Tarkovsky as the OP pic means you've read his quotes on cinema, art and spirituality. If not, please do so. It might be exactly what you need to read right now.



Just stepping in to say all film is art, be it Stalker or Persona, or transformers and point break

Worthwhile art is a different, more subjective concept entirely

Carry on


Yeah, Tarkovsky's films were some of the first I saw of a spiritual/philosophical nature that had a big effect on me, and the excerpts I've read of Sculpting in Time also informed a lot of my thinking on art and stuff for a while.

Yeah I wouldn't disagree, but for the most part, commercial films like Transformers have had a different effect on me than "art house" films by Bergman or Tarr or something. They both fall under the category of art, but their aims and effects are different, and it's the art house films which have changed the way I think about things.


File: 79105cd394212f8⋯.jpg (90.49 KB, 1300x957, 1300:957, are you calling me a pseud….jpg)


>replying to a three year old post

>only on /film/

While I understand, I respectfully disagree, sort of; as I have had a different experience with the viewing of films.

I feel as though many personal films offer a far more subjective view of reality than a more objective, even collective view. For example, many foreign films require a certain premeditated knowledge of the culture and history of the country. Many deal with issues of the time and I would be lying if I said that I can relate to these themes, ideas, and concepts.

You mention hallucinogens. Many of these drugs offer a more universal perspective of the world. They won't allow you to understand (depending on what it is) themes in an obscure Polish film (although they possibly could for the individual) but instead will give you a more universalist (fuck I hate that word) perspective on things.

I don't know, I'm talking out of my ass here.

And with that said films like The Hourglass Sanatorium, Golem, etc. do indeed support your statements. These are films that absolutely present a narrative that covers ideas and such that are not exclusively native to the place where they come from.


Yes, movies like Transformers are usually made for profit, not necessarily as art.

File: 3e6d5bd9c00b0f0⋯.jpg (22.13 KB, 291x411, 97:137, shin-godzilla-official-tea….jpg)


Managed to see this for the first time at a Manga Entertainment limited showing last night and a day later i'm still thinking about this.

On face value it is essentially a "what were the people not in the giant robots doing during the first angel attack in Eva" kind of story. 80% of the film is just politicians and scientists in a room talking. But i fucking loved it. It was the first time in a very long time i have seen a film in a mainstream cinema and thought it was good. Not competant. Not 'okay for an advert' but genuinely good. It is a thoughtful, methodical yet unpretentious commentary on the Japanese governments dealings with Fukushima. Its on the nose as far as asian cinema goes, but its not the barebones you would get from a western film. Theres no 'its coming because it got lured by nuclear reactors, truly the worst monster was man' bunkum. The film starts assuming its a volcanic disaster, the only change once Gojira shows up is the sentiment that its a disaster with no precedent, can they mobilise the JSDF or is this breaking the WWII surrender agreements.

Its not a pacific rim style love letter, its taking the base idea of Godzilla as a natural disaster brought on by nuclear catastrophe rather than a heroic sentai style giant monster fighting hero and using it as a completely serious discussion on how japan has so few infrastructures in place for disasters which in real world terms is strange when they are on the most violent fault lines on earth the 'ring of fire' that circles the pacific ocean.

The soundtrack ranges from Godzilla to heavy Evangelion inspiration. The acting ranges from rare but still there 'is this guy trying to be comedic?' japanese acting to solid performances from the older actors in particular but the lead while not excellent is believable as a character rather than an actor going through the motions of the script. Where the film stood out though -and it surprised me- was the cinematography. To sell the movie we were mostly shown trailers using static, wide shots but the majority of the movie uses some genuinely beautiful, subtle techniques that was a sign of a cinematographer in love with his work going far above what he had to do to bring what he wanted to the shots. Lingering tracking shots that use mise-en-scene to create sillouettes and a uPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


I liked it. Sorry my reply is shit but I'm tired.


It's Anno making real robot genre anime movie without robots. "Real monsters", probably.

Judging CGI is hard, because you never know what part of it is bad, and what part looks inspiring enough for Japanese. Trains could have been made less Densha Otoko-ish, though.



The strange part is how you go 'man that guy in the suit looks fake' BUT IT WAS CGI MEANT TO LOOK LIKE A GUY IN A FUCKING SUIT

File: 3f0c7dd5eb74978⋯.jpg (109.98 KB, 950x372, 475:186, IPS vs Plasma.jpg)


I am deciding between these two:

27" (or a bit larger) IPS monitor 1080p or higher.

50" (or a bit larger) Plasma TV 1080p.

I will be watching most content in 1080p.

The IPS monitor would be connected to my PC.

The Plasma TV would be in the family room and have movies transferred to it via SD card.

Which is going to have the best picture quality/features/viewing experience?

I already have audio equipment so the built in speakers of the plasma is irrelevant.

I cannot afford both; I need to pick one or the other.

1 post omitted. Click reply to view.


Buy a camera projector and film.


File: e0232bf31f39a79⋯.jpg (192.87 KB, 842x1264, 421:632, 1503056420412.jpg)

What is your budget?

If you can cough up money for 32" Ultrasharp (UP3216Q) then do it, easily better choice than buying a mediocre tv for same price.



I forgot to mention I would be buying either of these used on craigslist.

I don't want to spend more than $200.



Well plasma TVs are known for great colour and blacks, and they're almost impossible to find new now. Not sure how good of a used IPS u can get at 200.



File: ad1d073ad28b79d⋯.jpg (396.54 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 20170126193019_1.jpg)


I'm looking for movies that are from the same era as Bioshock, I really love the style of that game as was wondering if any movies had a similar style?

3 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 3b3d07ef5229a90⋯.jpg (93.83 KB, 1280x721, 1280:721, tKDdG71JUCCqNLVdjxI4NRdFXg….jpg)


Jeunet's first short film has a unique industrial atmosphere too, although it's not in color


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Soviet science fiction


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


This will probably make me a persona non grata here, but I quite enjoyed Giorgio Moroder’s version.



I haven't seen that version but it really depends on the music for me. I think a silent film with a complete Moroder soundtrack would be great. I do have doubts about pop vocals.


File: 4aaabcb93350adf⋯.jpg (386.54 KB, 1280x1920, 2:3, 1EK7mGCpRKYmSg25FaojvnS9op….jpg)




I really like this version tbh, possibly one of my favorite animated movies too.

It's loosely based on the original film.

File: f973ade4aa7a72f⋯.png (124.87 KB, 1080x628, 270:157, Screenshot_20170728-185836….png)


>tfw too smart

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


File: df6c1a06cf94d45⋯.jpg (85.14 KB, 1154x424, 577:212, IMG_20170729_223910.jpg)


File: 6065be3b1af79ac⋯.png (206.3 KB, 1280x353, 1280:353, failure.png)


Either it doesn't have an international release, or boxofficemojo doesn't want to crush my hope when the chinks it this shit up but it certainly isn't making loads of dosh.




Also the total budget has to be 100 million+ when you add marketing.


The whole emoji film itself is trash, but it isn't any worse than the other typical normie shit people watch. The only reason the backlash is so immense and so much more prevalent than any other film that's inherently bad but made for children is due to our culture seeing it as instantly cringy and blindly judging it due to having such a money catching premise. The film is bad, but not worst than anything we're outputting in modern cinema. The hate is just a circle jerk from the masses. lmao



Yeah but it's filled with ads for big apps.

Spotify, youtube, Dropbox, Candy Crush, Just Dance, it easily made its money back with just those

File: 1422756953458.jpg (8.86 KB, 300x225, 4:3, IMDB-logo.jpg)


ITT: Low-rated films you actually like. Based on the IMDB rating or some other aggregate measure.

Why do you like them, and why do you think the masses hate them? And how low can you go ratings-wise?

Hilariously bad movies like The Room or Troll 2 don't really count since most people watch them ironically.
14 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 9d440ad8195bc68⋯.png (405.27 KB, 640x480, 4:3, 001.png)

File: 70700ac6a22bcac⋯.webm (10.78 MB, 640x480, 4:3, Northward.webm)

File: 10dae7f1e568695⋯.png (364.44 KB, 640x480, 4:3, 002.png)

File: 284171e64553668⋯.png (379.54 KB, 640x480, 4:3, 003.png)

Rhodes of Africa (1936)

I don't visit imdb ever since they killed their forums, but I see from archive.org this rates 5.7. No rating on other sites.

I believe this film loses points for painting a complimentary picture of a colonialist who's since fallen into ill repute. There's a 1996 miniseries about Cecil Rhodes which rates 8.1—it would be instructive to analyze the differences. I still enjoyed this one because I didn't know the history of British and Dutch colonies in South Africa.

The cast is strong, led by the always entertaining Walter Huston. However my favorite character was not Rhodes but President Paul Kruger of Transvaal (aka the Boers). The real Paul Kruger was quite a character too—a man who believed the earth was flat in the Current Year of 1890. In the film, Kruger just wanted to smoke tobacco and read Scriptures while looking out over his bucolic farmland. His tranquility is shattered by Rhodes who crashes onto his property with talk of northward expansion and progress and profit. Kruger wants no part of it. Undeterred, Rhodes charges ahead toward the land which became Rhodesia.

The film's action sequences felt like typical Hollywood fare. In fact I didn't pay attention to the opening credits so I thought it was a US production (despite the staunchly pro-British perspective).

I think Rhodes of Africa would make a good prequel to Zulu, as it outlines the relative positions of the British and the Boers. All in all it's no worse than a random John Ford film.


File: e4b82cf09b76794⋯.jpg (74.47 KB, 400x556, 100:139, toysposter.jpg)


Is this Barry Levinson's best film? I think it is. And honestly one of Robin Williams' best also.


bumping for interest

how about "arthouse" films with low ratings


File: 8c489072747374d⋯.jpg (80.15 KB, 567x565, 567:565, R-2968141-1314702419.jpeg.jpg)

Vintage porn rates pretty low, as if people are comparing it to cinema classics instead of other porn

This one screened at Cannes and has a pretty cool soundtrack


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073682/ - 6.4/10


The Bling Ring and Noah are pure кино. Both for too many reasons to type out. But the former is great satire and the latter is one of the only good and accurate biblical films, its batshit and should be.

File: 1411588587930.jpg (273.9 KB, 1195x1600, 239:320, Les Bas-fonds (1936).jpg)


Jean Renoir won by the majority of the votes in the French poetic realism poll (surprise, surprise). The Lower Depths based on the play with the same title by a soviet writer Maxim Gorky are a fairly good example of a quite underrated, yet very watchable film from Renoir's filmography that at the same time encapsulates most of the most common themes of the movement rather well.

Here's a short info on what the film is about:
>A charismatic thief makes friends with a bankrupt baron who comes to live in the thief's slum. Meanwhile the thief seeks the love of a young woman, who is held emotionally captive by her slumlord family.

Objectives of the thread:
>watching the movie and sharing your thoughts about it in the thread (duh)
>possibly discussing other films by Renoir if anybody feels inclined
>discussing the future form of the film club
>suggesting the new themes and film movements for the next week
45 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1413264354435.jpg (67.56 KB, 580x443, 580:443, Z.jpg)

In the interest of forward momentum, the nominees are:

Poison (Todd Haynes, 1991)
L.A. Zombie (Bruce La Bruce, 2010)
Dans ma peau / In My Skin (Marina de Van, 2002)
Kladivo na čarodějnice / Witchhammer (Otakar Vávra, 1970)
Osobisty pamietnik grzesznika przez niego samego spisany / Memoirs of a Sinner (Wojciech Has, 1986)
White Epilepsy (Philippe Grandrieux, 2012)
Viva la muerte / Long Live Death (Fernando Arrabal, 1971)
Trouble Every Day (Claire Denis, 2001)
Spalovac mrtvol / The Cremator (Juraj Herz, 1969)
The Cat and the Canary (Paul Leni, 1927)
La ville des pirates / City of Pirates (Raoul Ruiz, 1983)
Matka Joanna od aniolów / Mother Joan of the Angels (Jerzy Kawalerowicz, 1961)


Zulawski was omitted since he was featured in a previous film club iteration.

Review the list and vote here: http://strawpoll.me/2777761


Memoirs of a Sinner seems to be the favorite.

Poland, are you still here? You can start the Film Club thread since your suggestion won. Otherwise I'll do it.

We might as well do 2nd place City of Pirates next, to close out "horror" October. Unless there's strong objection.


Will they be streamed?

I ask because I'm a plebe without a KG account


File: 1f6628efa862341⋯.png (382.89 KB, 720x540, 4:3, Les bas-fonds.[a].png)

File: e89f2c5886afa32⋯.png (454.36 KB, 720x540, 4:3, Les bas-fonds.[b].png)

File: 8b448689a8c8099⋯.png (374.55 KB, 720x540, 4:3, Les bas-fonds.[c].png)

File: b6582a105c61d78⋯.png (454.55 KB, 720x540, 4:3, Les bas-fonds.[d].png)

File: 7020287d9b7a057⋯.png (492.74 KB, 720x540, 4:3, Les bas-fonds.[e].png)


I found this interesting thread at the tail end of the catalog and decided to watch The Lower Depths. It's kind of stupid to respond to an ancient thread where everyone is gone, and most of the thread isn't even about the film in question, but I'm doing it anyway.

Renoir is fine although not one of my favorites. I haven't cared to explore his deep cuts. I doubt I'd ever watch this film if it weren't mentioned here. I liked doing a "forced exposure" viewing for the first time in a while.

The story dragged for me at first. I thought the contrast of the noble bum vs. the bum noble would dominate the film, but soon it gave way to the domestic drama. At that point the drama became more engaging imo.


>Baron steals from casinos

I don't think the baron was a thief because he only lost money

Gabin and Jouvet are awfully friendly and affectionate with each other. I assume modern critics, looking to say something, would say theirs is some kind of gay relationship.

There's an Otto Preminger shot in this film - zoom on a room's window, several hours pass, zoom out to show the same room. Renoir used a cut for the time change where Preminger usually did it smoothly, one fluid take. This must be one of the earliest examples of that idea in a film. Preminger used it frequently.

I saw Renoir stylistic signatures - in particular the use of multiple layers of activity on the screen. There were many examples in the second half where characters would talk on a balcony overlooking people walking in the courtyard.

It seemed odd that the characters were dressed completely in black for the happy ending. You'd think that was foreshadowing doom.

I'm surprised that no one mentioned there's a later version of thisPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 9e8921c25721db7⋯.jpg (95.57 KB, 500x364, 125:91, straub-huillet2.jpg)


"I'll tell you why Rivette is important. After finishing Paris belongs to us, he declares: "The intellectual nothingness of the films of Louis Malle", and it is printed. Today in Italy nobody would print that, not even the Manifesto, I swear to you. Today, if someone said, "The intellectual nothingness of the films of Rosi", it would be put ... in safety. That's what's changed. At the time, the magazine Cahiers du Cinéma, of which Rivette was the editor-in-chief, was a review of combat, struggle, and war. Because they destroyed Delannoy which is a glory of French cinema. It's like saying ... What is the name of the beautiful story of Bellocchio? Which we saw 1 / 2h to Buti under the stars. The Ora di Religion. It's vomiting, you have to have the courage to say it. And Rivette at the time in his magazine had the courage to say it. He was also able to say that the Taviani are sentimental dunces and that there is not the slightest emotion in these films, nor in those of Bellocchio; There is only a sauce, a soup to vomit useless images that do not exist, that do not hold, that are not there, there is nothing on the screen. At the time the Cahiers were doing this work. They were able to say, "The intellectual nothingness of Louis Malle's films," it was a terrible thing at the time. Truffaut wrote pages and pages in Arts against Delannoy, to defend Bresson. It was always to defend something."


File: b0fb68e7f38b438⋯.jpg (270.28 KB, 1000x1524, 250:381, elevator-to-the-gallows-as….jpg)


I would say Rivette is important because of his films. If he was just an opinionated French critic from decades ago I wouldn't pay much attention to him.

But now I'm wondering which issue has this article about Malle? Paris Belongs to Us came out in 1961 so Malle had directed Elevator to the Gallows, The Lovers, Zazie in the Metro. I've only seen the first but I thought it was a nice little thriller.

File: 1411390270248.jpg (90.73 KB, 1097x680, 1097:680, ssshhh.JPG)


36 posts and 55 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: f60163207d4674f⋯.png (224.22 KB, 1161x789, 387:263, f60163207d4674f27c80125be8….png)

More Parajanov-kun and tarkovskysan please


We need a board-tan


What do you guys think, use the drawing of Parajanov in a tub? >>501

Or does someone have a better idea?



>We need a board tan

Let the /tv/ threads sink to page two then we might be able to put time into the board again.


File: c8eaccc0a342eb6⋯.jpg (86.61 KB, 363x423, 121:141, ImageServlet.jpg)


that's okay, him or Raul Ruiz but I can't draw



do it

File: 168ab49756b56e8⋯.png (100.53 KB, 339x475, 339:475, my entire career.png)


>no Brendan Fraser /film/ thread

Lets change that. Whats your favorite Fraser film? I've seen the Mummy about 20 times as a kid so its probably my favorite one.

7 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: eb15e10d22627ec⋯.jpg (105.74 KB, 500x715, 100:143, 1437610088887.jpg)


What's that got to do with Fraser, you bum?


File: 6620236b569b5e2⋯.jpg (113.41 KB, 699x999, 233:333, 936full-gods-and-monsters-….jpg)


Clearly I've mistaken you for someone who knows Brenden


File: c1222b24f24fd0a⋯.jpg (190.51 KB, 1000x1500, 2:3, 9DIWNDwGkWR1yAAcJu9Ccb6TuG….jpg)

File: 39cbee4a9792e73⋯.png (399.88 KB, 500x733, 500:733, The-Quiet-American_v2_Appr….png)

File: 765b8ae11e82f82⋯.jpg (24.62 KB, 279x402, 93:134, movieposter.jpg)

>Brendan appreciation thread

Glad i wasn't the only one planning to do it


This man clearly knows what's up

Why are we having this recent influx of new users?



Codemonkey has been shilling this board on every 8chan page aside from the homepage.

Not that it's a bad thing, I like this board so far.


File: 3dfb1fde214a12e⋯.jpg (8.48 KB, 183x182, 183:182, 1428065255094.jpg)


>Codemonkey has been shilling this board on every 8chan page

Sweet Jesus

File: 13af876622a16b8⋯.jpeg (413.09 KB, 800x1200, 2:3, 13af876622a16b8fc7f04819d….jpeg)


/tv is here everyone! We're being raided!!! Watch out for the brendanposters and kidкино aka pedoposters!

Hide in this thread and let's talk about Tarkovsky!


File: 4252ddba6459134⋯.png (459.25 KB, 847x1200, 847:1200, Female Kira.png)

>/tv/ is attacking

>Let's talk about Tarkovsky

They sure are kid, they sure are.



go away weeb


File: 6d7101feb794b6d⋯.jpeg (227.43 KB, 480x640, 3:4, 1482536623186.jpeg)


stop posting that pic loser



I hate anigay, I only use the pic to mock people.


>Says the guy posting CHloe memes from /tv/

Now that this board finally died 8chan has too.

Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / dempart / doomer / komica / tingles / zooscat ]