>>771950
>>772033
>>772465
>>772534
>I get that you didn't mean any disrespect to Christ with this webm dude …
Thank you for at least not flying off the handle, all of you, and expressing discomfort without the vitriol I am so used to here.
I don't mind. I didn't make it, so I'm not hurt by the criticism.
I am a little surprised, since I picked the meme up from a previous meme thread on this very board where it seemed to attract no negative press.
But I get that /christian/ of six months ago is never going to be the /christian/ of today
And I get the reasons belying critiques of today.
Guess I won't post it here again.
I will, however, offer this one thought for your consideration.
We've had some discussions here before about "Christ on other planets". There seems to have been an acceptance, if not a consensus, that Christ could have walked amongst other exo-peoples obviously in their form if they exist that is, if the concept of aliens isn't just the debil's trickery as some asserted
(pic related) spoilered to avoid triggerations
You might see where I am going, but that isn't entirely my point: If Gondola is an artistic expression of humanity, albeit a quirky cartoon one, should we exclude Christ from it? Ought we always cede to non-Christians the entire palette of artistry. And, if not, ought we not make plain, within that context, the most important of Christ's events?
I understand that it may seem to "trivialise" the most important event in all of history, to cartoon-ify the crucifixion, buPost too long. Click here to view the full text.