[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / ausneets / choroy / doomer / egy / fur / mde / vichan ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog   Archive

Winner of the 75nd Attention-Hungry Games
/caco/ - Azarath Metrion Zinthos

March 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
Verification *
File *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Ya'll need Mises.

File: 7d7d62dcecaa6bf⋯.png (851.64 KB, 1366x768, 683:384, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.98804[Reply]

Why is it that neetsocs are capable of this kind of autism but ancaps are only capable of being frustrated when a leftist posts on their board?

5 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98830

>>98809

>being a normalfag

All you need to admit now is that you're gay, under-aged and some kind of minority and you'll be completely reprehensible. At least you kind of like freedom.


 No.98831

File: cf15205823aec17⋯.gif (139.87 KB, 379x440, 379:440, 1472331159044.gif)

>this thread

And then they wonder why socialists are taking over.


 No.98832

>>98804

what board is it?


 No.98833

>>98804

This is why no one respects nazis anymore. On the other hand, it's the sole reason weebs are'nt shoved into lockers anymore.

also

>cuckime


 No.98836

>>98809

Unironically this. When I am not busy working my job, I am reading, helping my family, or spending time with my girlfriend. Such is life when you are past eighteen.




File: b64da2b4c8daee2⋯.png (961.98 KB, 899x1025, 899:1025, ancap snek teaching kaoru ….png)

 No.89841[Reply]

Which is the most effective means to usher in a voluntary society in the long run?

The methods I've seen on /liberty/ so far are:

>Working within the state to enact reforms, educating the masses, and/or peaceful demonstrations

>Libertarian homesteading on sea/space/terra nullius

>Participating in the black/gray market to undermine state control of the economy

>Bunkering down with ample supplies and ammo and waiting for government to collapse

>Armed struggle followed by a temporary regime to purge collectivism and reorient society along voluntary lines

42 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98710

File: dfdaa4bf2f01232⋯.jpg (85.21 KB, 960x660, 16:11, google.jpg)


 No.98721

>>98692

>>98710

>This is why Golang was created


 No.98749

>>98721

to give jobs to trannie autist communists?


 No.98797

>>98692

That's a furry, not a weeb.


 No.98834

>>98797

Name 2 differences. Other than weebs being mutts.




File: c3681b84cde38ab⋯.jpg (381.71 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, wall1.jpg)

 No.98415[Reply]

Are major corporations really private businesses? E.g., is it more accurate to consider Google to be a private corporation, or just another agency of the U.S. federal government–with some PR dressing to make it seem like they aren't? Does the U.S. federal government use the FBI and it's impossible-to-comply legal code to essentially blackball any remotely useful private agency to become another wing of the U.S. federal government?

Does private business even exist in the U.S. anymore, aside from maybe some plumbers in the Midwest?

26 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98744

>>98680

>That's basically what socialism is all about, the key gripe with socialists is that an "elite" owns everything and no one else has access. Corporatism as a philosophy is paying workers in shares and letting random people buy shares, then redistributing the profits of the corporation (dividends).

That has nothing to do with corporatism. Corporatism is the organisation of production into corporations with delineated, mutually exclusive areas of interest with the aim of reducing competition and increasing productivity by eliminating parallel efforts. The East India Company was a corporatist entity (as well as a corporation). So were medieval guilds. Worker ownership of the means of production does not enter into the equation at all.

>Uh… buddy… cooperatives are literally corporations. They are incorporated, they file corporate tax returns, they are subject to the same rules and have the same government protections.

Of course they're often corporations. So are virtually all companies nowadays. That doesn't mean they operate under corporatist principles because corporations and corporatist ideology aren't the same thing.

>A corporation is an organization, usually a group of people or a company, authorized to act as a single entity (legally a person) and recognized as such in law.

>Corporatism is a political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labour, military, scientific, or guild associations on the basis of their common interests. The idea is that when each group performs its designated function, society will function harmoniously — like a human body (corpus) from which its name derives.

<them words sound the same, so they must mean the same!


 No.98773

>>98596

>Why do you consider these states capitalist

Because they employ the capitalist mode of production (Working class sells labor for wages to a capitalist class who profits from the sale of the commodities produced by said working classes labor)


 No.98775

>>98744

>Worker ownership of the means of production does not enter into the equation at all.

How do you explain a worker for example being paid in shares (such as almost all corporations do) where the shares let them actually vote in how the corporation is run, any profits are paid to them as dividends, and they literally own the means of production (the machines that do the work).

>So are virtually all companies nowadays.

There's like a 100:1 ratio for privately owned companies to corporations. Dude have you ever been in an accounting office? We have about 650 privately owned companies (sole proprietors) and 40 corporations, and we bust our ass getting the corporations every day because they pay us more for less work.


 No.98785

File: 4be53bec43ee587⋯.jpg (13.38 KB, 320x290, 32:29, 1550451770370.jpg)

>>98775

>How do you explain a worker for example being paid in shares (such as almost all corporations do) where the shares let them actually vote in how the corporation is run, any profits are paid to them as dividends, and they literally own the means of production (the machines that do the work).

It's a means of payment like any other, and an excellent way of getting your employees involved in the well being of the corporation ( and often avoiding taxes), but by no means is it a requirement for all corporations.

I dont understand why you keep claiming corporations are required to do all this arbitrary shit when all they are is legal entities.

>there are way more conpanies than corporations

Well, okay, but that wasn't my point. As far as I can tell, you're claiming:

>all cooperatives are corporations

>therefore corporations are cooperatives

>therefore corporations are socialism

>therefore corporatism is socialism

I'm telling you cooperative elements are not required for something to be a corporation, most corporations aren't cooperatives, some cooperatives aren't corporations, publicly traded stocks have fuck all to do with cooperatives or socialism and corporatism and corporations only share etymological similarities.

>he works in an accounting office

Woe betide your clients


 No.98818

>>98773

Do you mean the businesses employ the capitalist mode of production and not the state? How do you determine who are in which class? For instance I am paid a wage and own stocks and property.




File: eec4094c48d2043⋯.png (284.59 KB, 1200x1200, 1:1, 1200px-Seal_of_the_Central….png)

File: d9d0fb241fe0a67⋯.png (214.25 KB, 444x458, 222:229, image (1).png)

File: eec4094c48d2043⋯.png (284.59 KB, 1200x1200, 1:1, 1200px-Seal_of_the_Central….png)

 No.98805[Reply]

 No.98811

>>98805

They made this thread. I hate pseudo-cyclical threads that seem to respawn about a month or two after they fall off the board.




File: 2b4e94d7a8d6503⋯.png (499.43 KB, 1197x776, 1197:776, draft.png)

 No.98792[Reply]

>Women declared equal regarding combat roles

>Women now eligible for draft

>Still not requiring women to sign up for the draft would be inconsistent

>Draft abolished altogether

Big win. A single silver lining actually can actually come out of something feminists touched.

1 post omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98794

>>98793

what do you need besides the headline?


 No.98795

File: 0a3cc3172b85045⋯.png (136.72 KB, 355x394, 355:394, alex jones.png)

I think the jews are ready to stop white people once and for all by killing white women by sending them to war in the next year or so.

ok, I don't really think this, but I like to think it's real and it will happen because it's more exciting than living in a world of faggots who think it's accettable to send people to fight each other to death, regardless of their gender fuck the State


 No.98796

>>98792

This is clown world. They'll make women sign up for the draft before they even think about abolishing it.


 No.98799

>>98792

Great. Now let's wait a thousand more years for these dumb whores to realize that neither men, nor women should be in goverment.


 No.98801

>>98799

heeey

cheer up buddy

at least it's a start

just 1,000 more years and it's over




File: b8784754055417b⋯.jpg (47.29 KB, 509x500, 509:500, libertariansabortion.jpg)

 No.98565[Reply]

Can we start a catalog of common threads. I feel like we have the same conversations every few months because threads 404 after a period.

Common topics like

>Chicago vs Austrian Schools

>Mutualism

>Why the different types of socialism suck

>Intellectual Property debate

>Abortion

>Open vs Closed Borders

>Hoppe and Paleolibertarians

>Oligopoly in AnCap and Natural Monopolies

>Egoism and Stirner

>Why /pol/ and NeetSoc are stupid

Feel free to name any more common threads that crop up every few months

21 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98779

>>98776

>Until the second the fetus leaves the womb and has its umbilical cord severed it remains reliant effectivly parasitically leeching off of the energy and resources (Financial / physical etc) of the mother

But the fetus did not decide to do this. The mother decided to create the fetus and force it to use her resources.

If I put a gun to your head and forced you to take my wallet, are you still a thief? Can I kill you for the theft?

What a ridiculously incomplete morality.


 No.98780

>>98778

>Or a group or people

Yes, that's what is implied by "or entity." Either a group of people, or a covenant community (as defined by private property), whose terms of lease you have violated.

>or a potential group or people who isn't even there, but might be one day.

No, that's retarded. The NAP, and any legal theory based on it, deals strictly in actions committed by one entity onto another entity whose rights have been violated. Saying it applies to things that only exist in potentiality effectively means that it can apply to whatever you wish, as "potential" is such an arbitrary and unprovable concept. It has no place in legal theory.


 No.98781

File: 0eef321234c74f7⋯.jpg (52.7 KB, 780x439, 780:439, rowdy-roddy-piper-15204370….jpg)

>>98779

Oh I forgot to post an image of someone I like but who is dead and irrelevant to the discussion, in the hopes that another user will side with me in this discussion because of our shared like of the dead guy.

>>98780

The NAP isn't a law, it's a principle, we went over this.


 No.98782

>>98781

Semantics play isn't enough to discount my argument. You can't aggress against people that aren't there, but might be one day, because that's a group which includes every fucking person alive or who might be alive one day. You can't aggress without aggressing against somebody or something. There has to be a victim.


 No.98800

>>98779

Yes the mother (In some cases) may have actively chosen to create the fetus to begin with

That Dosent change the argument that they have the power to destroy it




File: 6ce81c7909ea468⋯.jpg (162.61 KB, 828x911, 828:911, 1551240664784.jpg)

File: 7f1497b21af89b9⋯.jpg (289.45 KB, 810x2077, 810:2077, Screenshot_20190226-235800.jpg)

File: 12c15ec9338825c⋯.png (160.42 KB, 900x900, 1:1, State_of_Liberty-Seal-1.png)

 No.98742[Reply]

There is a movement to divide Washington state and create a new state called Liberty

>Creation of new state strictly by gun rights activists

>75% of Eastern WA population supports movement, has congressional backing with multiple bills

>low tax obligations-“government doesn’t produce or own wealth—citizens do”

>”The right to manage and protect life and property will be honored at all levels of government.”

>Currently a voting contest for what the official state rifle will be

https://www.seattleweekly.com/news/split-washington-in-two-51st-state-movement-highlights-cultural-divide

https://libertystate.org

https://libertystate.org/about/grievances/

The creation of a new state is constitutional

>Article 4, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States allows for the division of a state with a simple majority vote of the Legislature of the state and Congress:

>“New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.”

>https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/articles/article-iv

Would aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

12 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98765

>>98759

^this.

I am all for Seattleland going the fuck away.


 No.98768

I don't think this will ever happen, as neat as it would be. Washington already has a food shortage and they have to compete with Commiefornia for being the shittiest state west of Kansas. This would create business competition from companies crossing the border to Liberty land, and between that, having to pay more for food as it passes into Washington since Liberty land DOT regulations would undoubtedly be less strict, and cutting off half the taxes the cities steal from the surrounding regions, they'd be fucked and have to figure shit out quick or otherwise become like Chiraq, which they'd never willingly do. The legislature will be bribed, shot, or otherwise coerced as soon as there's an inkling that this could occur. Tax splurgers won't give up their source of taxes without a fight.


 No.98769

>>98760

Are you a statist?


 No.98770

>>98754

>Illumanist / Mason

So?

The (Actual) Bavarian school Illuminati and the Masons were originally enlightened clubs who pretty much wanted to introduce liberalism and enlightenment values to the monarchies of Europe and their colonies

I don't find that contradictory with what most liberals / libertarians believe

>>98769

The state (USA) that Washington helped proclaim was infinitely less "Statist" in Liberal terminology then pretty much any other state on earth at the time


 No.98774

>>98770

I agree that he was generally a good guy in terms of bringing liberty. He's been hijacked as an icon of state worship that's not worth trying to reclaim.




File: e755d541e5b5364⋯.webm (506.33 KB, 640x344, 80:43, australian_nihilism.webm)

 No.98696[Reply]

http://archive.is/jV263

>The short answer to 'how we will pay for' the Green New Deal is easy.

>We'll pay for it just as we pay for all else: Congress will authorize necessary spending, and Treasury will spend.

>This is how we do it – always has been, always will be.

>The money that's spent, for its part, is never 'raised' first.

>To the contrary, federal spending is what brings that money into existence.

Well, shit. Why don't we just sign a bill funding research into genetically engineered catgirls in space? After all, we'll pay for it just as we pay for all else: Congress will authorize necessary spending, and Treasury will spend.

>Representative Ocasio-Cortez, whose educational background is in economics, understands as few leaders seem to do that our problems of late have been problems of deflation, not inflation.

Because when people complain about being in millions of dollars in debt, that's a problem of deflation.

This is what it looks like when you sentence economics to a spiral of continual degradation, until it has distilled into pure shitfuckery. How does it feel to know this isn't even its final form? How does it feel to know you're going to be able to watch this get implemented in public policy, in slow motion, all within your lifetime?

 No.98697

fix the fucking site


 No.98703

Oh God is that the MMT crap again?


 No.98723

>>98703

In essence, yes. Cortez and the Honorable Chairman Comrade Sanders have latched onto MMT even harder than they do their Che Guevara body pillows, because they found the phrase "deficits don't matter" in the reading material.




File: d643f560d0a0eba⋯.jpg (535.33 KB, 1080x1195, 216:239, Screenshot_20190225-205609.jpg)

 No.98669[Reply]

>lol corporations wouldn't exist in a free mark-

8 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98690

>>98670

citations relative to the structure of the text are better than citations relative the structure of the matter on which an instance of the text is.


 No.98691

File: 2eb85aeb4332956⋯.mp4 (15.11 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Mr. Bond - Don't Like (Chi….mp4)

>(((free market)))

mutt

>>98671

You are thinking of goverment. Corporation where called another thing in the past: cartels.

The difference? Cartels are illegal. Thank the jews for that.


 No.98694

>>98688

>troll


 No.98698

>>98691

>all that gay shit you've just written

Why do you think anyone is going to read past your ridiculous "Jewish free market" implication and your broad, baseless insult?


 No.98731

File: a60616ee7f1d7c2⋯.webm (217.88 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, whut.webm)

>>98670

>>98669

Rothbard makes it quite clear in that very quote that the corporations he's talking about are not the same as government-ran oligopolies that exist today. Those two opinions are the same fucking thing, just one is explained more fluently. Further proof that the left can't meme.




File: fad6ced9811b029⋯.webm (1.92 MB, 408x720, 17:30, dollar_not_a_card.webm)

 No.98695[Reply]

http://archive.is/jV263

>The short answer to 'how we will pay for' the Green New Deal is easy.

>We'll pay for it just as we pay for all else: Congress will authorize necessary spending, and Treasury will spend.

>This is how we do it – always has been, always will be.

>The money that's spent, for its part, is never 'raised' first.

>To the contrary, federal spending is what brings that money into existence.

Well, shit. Why don't we just sign a bill funding research into genetically engineered catgirls in space? After all, we'll pay for it just as we pay for all else: Congress will authorize necessary spending, and Treasury will spend.

>Representative Ocasio-Cortez, whose educational background is in economics, understands as few leaders seem to do that our problems of late have been problems of deflation, not inflation.

Because when people complain about being in millions of dollars in debt, that's a problem of deflation.

This is what it looks like when you sentence economics to a spiral of continual degradation, until it has distilled into pure shitfuckery. How does it feel to know this isn't even its final form? How does it feel to know you're going to be able to watch this get implemented in public policy, in slow motion, all within your lifetime?



File: cbacfe67845c9ac⋯.jpg (169.05 KB, 720x672, 15:14, muh_reichsmarks.jpg)

 No.98439[Reply]

I found an article that narrates the financial activities of the NATSOC Germany, how so many private companies could accept bills as payment?, also it explains why the goverment persecuted people behind the private banks.

https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Inflation_in_Nazi_Germany

4 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98480

>>98456

All currency not made of precious metals is promisory, in other words IOU payments. All currency made of precious metals is just a complex form of trade.

Remember, the first currency happened in the middle ages when pilgrims to the promised land couldn't bring their gold with them, so they brought a paper notarized by a trusted person saying "this guy has X amount of gold". They then traveled with these papers, went to another trusted person, and asked for X amount of real physical gold based on the legitimacy of the paper itself.

Unless you're trading with things of value, you're just doing IOU's.


 No.98496

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.98558

>>98479

it was not sustainable because the prices were controlled and goods subsided whit money that the state didnt had.


 No.98589

>>98558

did not they print the money?


 No.98679

>>98589

before the war, it was mostly covered by bills, after the war the german state took direct control of the central bank and started to just print money, the income taxes were raised to 50% percent.

This topic is taboo between the third position.




Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.98457[Reply]

This makes me fucking livid. This and the Tommy Robinson shit.

If the law is this fucking arbitrary, then the voices claiming that "violence is not the answer" is soon going to lose. When peaceful conversation is impossible, violent confrontation is going to be inevitable. If any Englishmen are on the board, let me know if you're planning on starting shit.

>b-b-b-ut anon, they could send you to jail for inciting a–

We're at the point where they could send me to jail for making a pug joke! Why the fuck are you concerned with that now?! The risk analysis is starting to come out at parity with just living out your life normally at the rate England is going!

11 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98599

HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.

Goddam.


 No.98632

>>98535

>stirner kiddie

trashed.


 No.98636

>>98559

I'm sorry but the only two differences between USSR and Nazi Germany is that the Jews were in charge of one and not in the other, and that one is internationalist and the other is nationalist. Neither of these is a salient difference from the point of view of /liberty/.


 No.98677

>>98559

Classes are a fucking spook you dumb nigger. There is no "class" except for what you arbitrarily delineate as one. This is one of the many reasons that gay shit you spout is nonsense. "Class" is for all intents and purposes the same as "Sinfulness". The higher your Class/Sinfulness the more you deserve punishment and the more you're expected to tithe.


 No.98678

>>98527

very very carefully




File: 49ca884a5c7dd30⋯.png (12 KB, 838x372, 419:186, 1548801077351.png)

 No.97109[Reply]

Why are wages rising with productivity?

99 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98521

>>98493

>I do not actually believe that all products and services which exist under another system can never, ever be sold in an ancap one.

<The NLRB is a federal agency, so how can you consider the existence of such as ancap?

Like poetry.


 No.98523

>>98521

What are you getting at? NLRB is not a product or service in the market so it does not even apply to ancap. It is a monopoly of force on labor laws.


 No.98590

>>98523

NAP is being broken in the market too sometimes


 No.98618

>>98590

Just because one violates the NAP does not make one a monopoly.


 No.98658

>>98618

yes this is right i think




YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.98333[Reply]

This thread is in honor of Bernie Sanders announcing his run for the presidency. Its only a matter of time now until his dumbass supporters wont shut the fuck up about how "hurr the scandanavia countries are perfect examples of how well socialism works!" and proving how dumb this lie is

>From last election, the Danish Prime Minister informs Bernie that his country isnt socialist

https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/denmark-tells-bernie-sanders-to-stop-calling-it-socialist/

>sorry Bernie bros, but Nordic countries are NOT socialist

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2018/07/08/sorry-bernie-bros-but-nordic-countries-are-not-socialist/#ad4079c74ad3

>Nordic countries arent socialist; theyre free trade lovers

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/402682-nordic-nations-are-not-socialist-theyre-free-trade-lovers

>Mises Institute: "Face it, nordic countries arent socialist"

https://mises.org/wire/face-it-nordic-countries-arent-socialist

>The Myth of the "socialist" Scandinavian countries

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY27TBAFqBE

just remember all this for when you start seeing your bernie bro retarded friends inevitably bring this up

2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98368

I don't believe any Marxists claim that Sweden or the north of Europe are socialist as they clearly exist as simple capitalist economies

Some SocialDemocrats uphold it as that though because of their social programs being similar as to what people like Sanders / AOC etc wish to implement


 No.98370

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


 No.98372

>>98368

Yeah it's primarily Social Democrats who promote this which makes it so annoying.


 No.98650

File: e6ec17aaeed3a13⋯.jpg (81.55 KB, 1177x752, 1177:752, Ingolfr-Arnarson.jpg)

medieval iceland was a libertarian utopia too


 No.98656




File: f7ac18f2d179d20⋯.jpg (130.87 KB, 1920x1198, 960:599, 1327413.jpg)

 No.98436[Reply]

Hi Ladies and Gentlemen! :) I made a youtube channel to attempt to wake people up and educate people about the things that aren't often talked about openly. I'm not doing this for myself in any way, shape or form. I don't need subscribers but if you want to subscribe that's cool. Thanks for your time. Have a nice day :D

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTfaAnj5NbNHeNDJAEQT7-Q?view_as=subscriber

2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.98518

How to educate the masses (that is, how to get the masses to be educated) on a specific topic.

-step null: educate yourself, or make sure you are properly educated. it makes educating others a whole lot easier.

-step one: find one person who is not educated on the given topic, and educate them. if they are unwilling to be educated, address that issue first. once they are educated, encourage them to educate others as you educated them.

-repeat step one.

if each person educated even just 2 people this way, the growth would be exponential. since some people will not educate others, it might make sense to pick up the slack and educate a some more people than strictly necessary.

>anonymous

didn't anyone get that anonymous isn't an organization? it's a meme from normies saying that 'anonymous' (as in, an anonymous person) did this or that, and sensationalist media putting a dark twist on it.


 No.98519

Thanks for this thread. Now I know why I am going to move to Canada.


 No.98531

>>98436

the satanic circle ritual sacrifices children killing is fake and schizo-tier


 No.98647

>>98518

Yeah I thought it was just a title anyone could use. Is it still relevant? I haven't seen any mention of it recently.


 No.98649

File: c7437cb82cce00d⋯.jpg (237.18 KB, 1947x2560, 1947:2560, m9Yn7VE.jpg)

>>98518

>-step null: educate yourself, or make sure you are properly educated. it makes educating others a whole lot easier.

This. But I'll take it a step further: Stop being a fucking loser, if that's what you are, like 80% of the guys who browse this imageboard, you need to seriously start improving yourself, because people don't care about what you say, as much as they care about where it is coming from.

Here's a few more points:

1. We must focus on educating children and younger generations, they will be the normies of tomorrow, in 10-20 years they will be the most influential age group in society. Educating others is important too, but the older they are, the more it is an uphill battle, and since we don't have as much resources as the government, we must concentrate our efforts instead of spreading ourselves thin.

2. We cannot expect immediate results. Don't think of it as a battle to change someone's mind, think of it as sowing seeds which will be harvested much later on. Even if you didn't fully convert someone, you would have sown enough doubt to ideologically stunt them (unless they constantly read commie literature and brainwash themselves).

3. It's not necessary to convert everyone to win. Lenin said he only needed 100 super dedicated guys to change the world, and the same could be said for us. Most revolutions happen because of a 5% of society that is politically active. Again, since we have a lot less resources to work with, we must concentrate our efforts instead of spreading ourselves thin.




Delete Post [ ]
[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / ausneets / choroy / doomer / egy / fur / mde / vichan ]